Skip to main content Accessibility help

Measuring the experience of consumers: reliability and factorial structure of the Take Two stakeholder survey

  • Margarita Frederico (a1), Allison Cox (a2) and Mohajer A. Hameed (a2)


The service user experience of children, their families and other stakeholders in a therapeutic program should inform quality of care, practice and organisation of services. Children referred to Take Two are clients of Child Protection for whom abuse and neglect have been substantiated. This paper aims to describe the development of the Take Two Stakeholder Survey, as well as to examine the reliability and factorial structure of the survey. In addition, the experience of consumers utilising the service will be described together with recommendations for clinical practice improvements and enhanced consumer engagement.


Corresponding author

Author for correspondence: Margarita Frederico, Email:


Hide All
Alexander, M. C. (2015). Measuring experience of care: Availability and use of satisfaction surveys in residential intervention settings for children and youth. Residential Treatment for Children and Youth, 32(2), 134143.
Barber, J., & Delfabbro, P. (2005). Children’s adjustment to long-term foster care. Children and Youth Services Review, 27(3), 329340.
Barker, R., & Place, M. (2005). Working in collaboration—A therapeutic intervention for abused children. Child Abuse Review, 14(1), 2639.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77101.
Bromfield, L., Higgins, D., Osborn, A., Panozzo, S., & Richardson, N. (2005). Out-of-home care in Australia: Messages from research. Australian Institute of Family Studies. Retrieved from
Bromfield, L., & Osborn, A. L. (2007). 'Getting the Big Picture': A Synopsis and Critique of Australian Out-of-home Care Research, NCPC Issues No. 26. Australian Institute of Family Studies Melbourne. Retrieved from
Brunk, M., & Koch, J. R. (1999). Assessing the outcomes of children’s mental health services: Development of the youth services survey for families. Paper presented at the 14th Annual Research Conference Proceeding: A system of care for children’s mental health: Expanding the research base. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida.
Cashmore, J., & Ainsworth, F. (2004). Audit of Australian out-of-home care research. Sydney NSW: Association of Children’s Welfare Agencies.
Commission for Health Improvement (CHI). (2002). Experience of Service Questionnaire [On-line]. Retrieved from
Frederico, M., Jackson, A., & Black, C. (2005). Reflections on complexity: Take Two First Evaluation Report 2004 – Summary Report. Bundoora: School of Social Work and Social Policy, La Trobe University. Retrieved from
Frederico, M., Jackson, A., & Black, C. (2006). Give Sorrow Words – Take Two Second Evaluation Report 2004-2005 La Trobe University Bundoora Australia.
Frederico, M., Jackson, A., & Black, C. (2010). More than words – the language of relationships: Take Two – third evaluation report. Bundoora, Australia: School of Social Work and Social Policy, La Trobe University. Retrieved from
Gain, L., & Young, L. (1998). Outcome measurement in child protection: International literature review and critical analysis of child protection and alternative placement outcome measures. Melbourne, Australia: Steering Committee for the Review of Commonwealth/State Service Provision.
Gilbertson, R., & Barber, J. G. (2002). Obstacles to involving children and young people in foster care research. Child & Family Social Work, 7(4), 253258.
Harris, G., Poertner, J., & Joe, S. (2000). The parents with children in foster care satisfaction scale. Administration in Social Work, 24(2), 1527.
Holland, S. (2009). Listening to children in care: A review of methodological and theoretical approaches to understanding looked after children’s perspectives. Children & Society, 23(3), 226235.
Jackson, A., Frederico, M., Cox, A., & Black, C. (2019). The Treatment of Trauma: The Neurosequential Model and “Take Two”. In Huppert, B. (Ed.), Traumatized people: Psychotherapy seen through the lens of diverse specialist treatments (pp. 423456). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Kapp, S. A., & Propp, J. (2002). Client satisfaction methods: Input from parents with children in foster care. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 19(3), 227245.
Larsen, D. L., Attkisson, C. C., Hargreaves, W. A., & Nguyen, T. D. (1979). Assessment of client/patient satisfaction: Development of a general scale. Evaluation and Program Planning, 2(3), 197207.
Lutz, W., & Hill, C. E. (2009). Quantitative and qualitative methods for psychotherapy research: Introduction to special section. Journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, 19(45), 369373.
McMurtry, S. L., & Hudson, W. W. (2000). The client satisfaction inventory: Results of an initial validation study. Research on Social Work Practice, 10(5), 644663.
Schreier, M. (2014). Qualitative content analysis in practice. In Flick, U. (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis. London, UK: Sage Publications, e-book,
Stuntzner-Gibson, D., Koren, P. E., & DeChillo, N. (1995). The youth satisfaction questionnaire: What kids think of services? Families in Society, 76(10), 616624.
Tabachnick, B. G. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 5355.
Tilbury, C., Osmond, J., & Crawford, M. (2010). Measuring client satisfaction with child welfare services Journal of Public Child Welfare, 4(1), 77–10. doi:10.1080/15548730903563160
Trotter, C. (2008). What does client satisfaction tell us about effectiveness? Child Abuse Review, 17(4), 262274.



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed