Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T02:29:15.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Homogenising Australia’s child protection laws: Will the cream still rise to the top?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2016

Max Liddell  and
Margaret Liddell
Max Liddell
Affiliation:
Dept of Social Work and Human Services Monash University, Clayton, Vic 3168
Margaret Liddell
Affiliation:
Department of Justice and Youth Studies, RMIT University, Bundoora Campus, Plenty Road, Bundoora, Vic 3083
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper discusses the increasing similarity between Australia’s states and territories in their child protection legislation. The paper deals mainly with the principles underlying child protection laws, definitions of abuse and neglect, and the way legislation deals with the likelihood and severity of harm to the child. The trend is towards adopting a common set of principles, and definitions which are relatively precise in targeting particular ‘types’ of abuse and eliminating status offences. However there are significant differences even between states which broadly adopt this type of legislation, and some states adopt quite different approaches. There is still little consensus on how likelihood and severity of harm are dealt with. The paper, in welcoming the principle of common legislation, notes a wide range of issues in the developing legal paradigm which have been subject to little or no public debate. It is not clear that the increasing ‘homogenisation’ of child protection laws is enshrining the kind of legislation required.

Type
Research Article
Information
Children Australia , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , 2000 , pp. 10 - 15
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angus, G., Dunn, C. & Moyle, H. (1996) Children under care and protection orders, Australia 1994–5, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra, Child Welfare Series No. 15.Google Scholar
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (1999), Child Protection Australia 1997–98, AIHW cat no CWS 8 (Child Welfare Series), AIHW, Canberra Google Scholar
Cashmore, J. & Paxman, M. (1996), Wards Leaving Care: A Longitudinal Study, NSW Department of Community Services, Sydney.Google Scholar
Cavanagh, J. (1992), ‘Children and young people in out-of-home care: Treating and preventing individual, programmatic and systematic abuse’, Children Australia, 17, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandez, E. (1996), Significant Harm: Unravelling Child Protection Decisions and Substitute Care Careers of Children, Avebury, Aldershot.Google Scholar
Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (1989), Our Homeless Children, AGPS, Canberra.Google Scholar
Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (1997), National Inquiry into the Separation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children from Their Families, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.Google Scholar
Legislative Review Unit, NSW Dept. of Community Services (1997), Review of the Children (Care and Protection) Act 1987: Recommendations for Law Reform, Department of Community Services, Sydney.Google Scholar
Liddell, Margaret (1992) ‘Young women subject to statutory orders and the transition to independence: Contradictions in policy and practice’, Children Australia, 17, 3.Google Scholar
Liddell, Max & Goddard, C. (1992), ‘State wardship and supervision and youth homelessness: Towards a better future’, in Saunders, P. & Encel, D. (eds.), Social Policy in Australia: Options for the 1990s, SPRC Reports and Proceedings No. 98, University of New South Wales Social Policy and Research Centre, Sydney.Google Scholar
Liddell, Max & Goddard, C. (1995), ‘Victorian child welfare: A continuing crisis of policy and provision’, in Saunders, P. & Shaver, S. (eds.) SPRC Reports and Proceedings No. 123, University of New South Wales Social Policy and Research Centre, Sydney.Google Scholar
Liddell, Max & Margaret, Liddell (1997), ‘Funders, regulators, providers, consumers: The brave new child welfare world’, paper presented to National Social Policy Conference, University of New South Wales Social Policy and Research Centre, Sydney, July 16–18.Google Scholar
Maunders, D., Max, Liddell, Margaret, Liddell & Green, S. (1999), Young people leaving care and protection: Report to the national youth affairs research scheme, Australian Clearinghouse for Youth Studies, Hobart.Google Scholar
Saunders, B. & Goddard, C. (1998), A critique of structured risk assessment procedures: Instruments of abuse?, Child Abuse and Family Violence Research Unit, Monash University Department of Social Work and Human Services, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. (1990), Leaving care and homelessness, Brotherhood of St. Laurence, Melbourne.Google Scholar