Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T01:44:12.784Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Child abuse in the context of parental separation and divorce: New reality and a new intervention model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2016

Thea Brown ,
Rosemary Sheehan ,
Margarita Frederico  and
Lesley Hewitt
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Child abuse allegations in the context of parental separation and divorce have long been seen as merely weapons fashioned by angry and vindictive parents involved in separation and divorce wars. They have been disregarded on the basis that they were unlikely to be real.

However recent research from Australia and overseas has shown that this picture is not true. Child abuse in this context is real and it is serious. Moreover the research has shown that the socio-legal system does not serve children caught in this situation at all well.

The Magellan program, a world first experimental program to overcome the problems for these children and their families as they progress through the socio-legal system, was introduced by a consortium of agencies in Victoria recently. This article reports on the program and its outcomes, and considers implications of some of the components of the new program for the various professionals working with this issue.

Type
Research Article
Information
Children Australia , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , 2002 , pp. 35 - 40
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Australian Law Reform Commission & Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (1997) Seen and Heard: Priority for Children in the Legal Process, Commonwealth of Australia, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, ACT.Google Scholar
Bala, N. & Schuman, J. (1999) ‘Allegations of Sexual Abuse When Parents have Separated’, Canadian Family Quarterly, Vol. 17, pp. 192–243.Google Scholar
Brown, C. (1995) ‘Custody Evaluations, Presenting the evidence to the Court’, Family and Conciliation Court's Review, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp.446–461.Google Scholar
Brown, T., Frederico, M., Hewitt, L. & Sheehan, R. (1998) Violence in Families: Report Number One, The Management of Child Abuse Allegations in Custody and Access Disputes in the Family Court of Australia, Family Violence and Family Court Research Program, Monash University, Clayton, Vic. p. 112.Google Scholar
Brown, T., Frederico, M., Hewitt, L. & Sheehan, R. (2001) ‘The Child Abuse and Divorce Myth’, Child Abuse Review, Vol. 10, pp.113–124.Google Scholar
Brown, T., with Sheehan, R., Frederico, M., & Hewitt, L. (2001) Violence in Families: Report Number Four, Resolving Violence to Children: an Evaluation of Project Magellan, Family Violence and Family Court Research Program, Monash University, Clayton Vic., pp.180.Google Scholar
Family Law Pathways Advisory Group (2001) Out of the Maze: Pathways to the Future for Families experiencing Separation, Report of the Family Law Pathways Advisory Group, Commonwealth Government, Canberra, ACT.Google Scholar
Hallett, C. (1995) Interagency Coordination in Child Protection, Studies in Child Protection, HMSO, UK.Google Scholar
Hay, Alison. (2001) Unpublished Ph.D. thesis proposal, Social Work at Monash, Caulfield.Google Scholar
Hester, M. & Radford, L. (1996) Domestic Violence and Child Contact Arrangements in England and Denmark, The Policy Press, Bristol, UK.Google Scholar
Hume, M. (1997) Child Sexual Allegations and the Family Court, unpublished Masters Thesis, Humanities and Social Sciences, University of South Australia.Google Scholar
Kay, M. & Tolmie, J. (1998) ‘Father's Rights Groups in Australia’, Australian Journal of Family Law, Vol. 12, pp. 19–67.Google Scholar
Schudson, C. (1992) ‘Antagonistic Parents in Family Courts: False Allegations or False Assumptions of Child Abuse?’, Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, Vol. 1, pp.111–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheehan, R. (2001) Magistrates' Decision Making in Child Protection Cases, Ashgate Publishing Limited, England.Google Scholar
Thoennes, N. & Pearson, L. (1988) ‘Summary of Findings from Child Sexual Abuse Project’, in Nicholson, B. and Bulkley, J. (eds.), Sexual Abuse Allegations in Custody and Visitation Cases, National Legal Resources Centre for Child Advocacy and Protection, USA.Google Scholar
Thorpe, D. (1994) Evaluating Child Protection, Open University Press, Buckingham, UK Google Scholar
Toth, P. (1992) ‘All Child Abuse Allegations Demand Attention’, Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, Vol. 1, pp.117–8.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, J. & Kelly, J. (1980) Surviving the Breakup, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. (2000) Children at Risk, a papa-presented to the 10th International Conference in Family Law, Brisbane, Australia.Google Scholar