Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Transthoracic echocardiography does not reliably predict involvement of the aortic valve in patients with a discrete subaortic shelf

  • Justin H. Booth (a1) (a2), Roosevelt Bryant (a2) (a3), Susan C. Powers (a4), Shuping Ge (a4), E. Dean McKenzie (a2) (a3), Jeffrey S. Heinle (a2) (a3), Charles D. Fraser (a2) (a3) and David L. S. Morales (a2) (a3)...

Abstract

Background

A discrete subaortic membrane cannot only cause left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, but can grow onto the aortic valve leaflets. The late finding of this encroachment is aortic valve insufficiency or stenosis. Echocardiography is used to follow the progression of outflow tract obstruction, but its ability to show subaortic membrane encroachment onto the aortic valve is unclear. The purpose of this study is to determine the sensitivity and specificity of echocardiography for diagnosing whether a discrete subaortic membrane involves the aortic valve.

Methods

A pre-operative determination of aortic valve involvement by a discrete subaortic membrane was obtained by review of the official pre-operative echocardiogram reading and a retrospective blinded review of the pre-operative echocardiogram by an independent echocardiographer. These findings were compared to the intra-operative findings.

Results

A total of 48 consecutive patients underwent primary resection for isolated discrete subaortic membrane between October, 1995 and May, 2006. The pre-operative and blinded readings both predicted a statistically lower rate of aortic valve involvement – 35% in 11 of 31 patients and 31% in 10 of 31 patients, respectively – than found at surgery – 65% in 31 of 48 patients. The sensitivity and specificity of pre-operative echocardiography to diagnose aortic valve involvement is 35% and 76%. Overall survival was 100%. There were no strokes, re-operations for bleeding or wound infections, or need for a pacemaker.

Conclusion

Echocardiography is not sensitive in assessing whether a discrete subaortic membrane involves the aortic valve. Since the morbidity and mortality for discrete subaortic membrane resection is negligible, resection may be indicated at the time of diagnosis to minimise aortic valve impairment.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Correspondence to: D L. S. Morales, MD, Texas Children’s Hospital, 6621 Fannin, Houston, Texas, USA. Tel: 832-826-1915; Fax: 1(832) 825-1905; E-mail: dlmorale@texaschildrens.org

References

Hide All
1. Stassano, P, Di Tommaso, L, Contaldo, A, et al. Discrete subaortic stenosis: long-term prognosis on the progression of the obstruction and of the aortic insufficiency. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 53: 2327.
2. El Habbal, MH. Discrete subaortic stenosis in a newborn. Pediatr Cardiol 1991; 12: 243244.
3. Kleinert, S, Ott, DA, Geva, T. Critical discrete subaortic stenosis in the newborn period. Am Heart J 1993; 125: 11871189.
4. Kirklin, JW, Barratt-Boyes, BG. Cardiac Surgery, 2nd edition. Churchill Livingstone, New York, 1993.
5. Rayburn, ST, Netherland, DE, Heath, BJ. Discrete membranous subaortic stenosis: improved results after resection and myectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 64: 105109.
6. Brauner, R, Laks, H, Drinkwater, DC Jr, Shvarts, O, Eghbali, K, Galindo, A. Benefits of early surgical repair in fixed subaortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 30: 18351842.
7. Douville, EC, Sade, RM, Crawford, FA Jr, Wiles, HB. Subvalvar aortic stenosis: timing of operation. Ann Thorac Surg 1990; 50: 2933.
8. Parry, AJ, Kovalchin, JP, Suda, K, et al. Resection of subaortic stenosis; can a more aggressive approach be justified? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999; 15: 631638.
9. Feigl, A, Feigl, D, Lucas, RV Jr, Edwards, JE. Involvement of the aortic valve cusps in discrete subaortic stenosis. Pediatr Cardiol 1984; 5: 185189.
10. Newfeld, EA, Muster, AJ, Paul, MH, Idriss, FS, Riker, WL. Discrete subvalvular aortic stenosis in childhood. Study of 51 patients. Am J Cardiol 1976; 38: 5361.
11. Shem-Tov, A, Schneeweiss, A, Motro, M, Neufeld, HN. Clinical presentation and natural history of mild discrete subaortic stenosis. Follow-up of 1–17 years. Circulation 1982; 66: 509512.
12. Wright, GB, Keane, JF, Nadas, AS, Bernhard, WF, Castaneda, AR. Fixed subaortic stenosis in the young: medical and surgical course in 83 patients. Am J Cardiol 1983; 52: 830835.
13. Serraf, A, Zoghby, J, Lacour-Gayet, F, et al. Surgical treatment of subaortic stenosis: a seventeen-year experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999; 117: 669678.
14. Cheevers, N. Observation on the disease of the orifice and valves of the aorta. Guy’s Hosp Rep 1842; 7: 55.
15. Kelly, DT, Wulfsberg, E, Rowe, RD. Discrete subaortic stenosis. Circulation 1972; 46: 309322.
16. Hardesty, RL, Griffith, BP, Mathews, RA, et al. Discrete subvalvular aortic stenosis. An evaluation of operative therapy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1977; 74: 352361.
17. McKay, R, Ross, DN. Technique for the relief of discrete subaortic stenosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1982; 84: 917920.
18. Ashraf, H, Cotroneo, J, Dhar, N, et al. Long-term results after excision of fixed subaortic stenosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1985; 90: 864871.

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed