Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T05:52:26.553Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Perioperative enhancement for CHD patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2017

Elizabeth B. Malinzak*
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
Solomon Aronson
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
Ankeet D. Udani
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
*
Correspondence to: E. B. Malinzak, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University School of Medicine, DUMC 3094, Durham, NC 27710, United States of America. Tel: +1 919 970 9983; Fax: +1 919 6812 8994; E-mail: Elizabeth.malinzak@duke.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Letters to the Editor
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2017 

To the Editor,

We applaud Wernovsky et al for sharing what we strongly support as excellent guidelines for standardised testing and coordinated surveillance of patients with complex CHD.Reference Wernovsky, Lihn and Olen 1 In the United States of America, there are currently more adults than children living with CHD, and projections indicate that this population will continue to grow.Reference Cannesson, Earing and Collange 2

CHD patients have improved life expectancy, higher healthcare utilisation rates,Reference Mackie, Pilote and Ionescu-Ittu 3 and increasingly require elective or emergent non-cardiac surgical, radiological, obstetric, and/or procedural care under anaesthesia. These patients have a higher risk of mortality compared with patients without CHD,Reference Faraoni, Zurakowski and Vo 4 , Reference Maxwell, Wong and Kin 5 and consequently carry with them lifetime complex medical and social issues that require multidisciplinary care.

Therefore, a perioperative care plan including consultation with an anaesthesiologist, discussion of unique patient characteristics that portend risk, anaesthetic technique, appropriate testing, and procedure location should be included in the “roadmap” for each patient. This type of patient-centred, interdisciplinary, coordinated care at our institution is implemented by the Perioperative Enhancement Team, whose projects to date have addressed patients with anaemia, diabetes, malnutrition, senior health, and chronic pain.Reference Aronson and Attarian 6 , Reference Guinn, Guercio and Hopkins 7 Motivated by the recommendations of Wernovsky et al, Perioperative Enhancement Team will now go forward to develop a programme to address the unique and important perioperative challenges of patients with CHD.

Acknowledgement

None.

Financial Support

None.

Conflicts of Interest

None.

References

1. Wernovsky, G, Lihn, SL, Olen, MM. Creating a lesion-specific “roadmap” for ambulatory care following surgery for complex congenital cardiac disease. Cardiol Young 2016; 115.Google ScholarPubMed
2. Cannesson, M, Earing, MG, Collange, V, et al. Anesthesia for noncardiac surgery in adults with congenital heart disease. Anesthesiology 2009; 111: 432440.Google Scholar
3. Mackie, AS, Pilote, L, Ionescu-Ittu, R, et al. Health care resource utilization in adults with congenital heart disease. Am J Cardiol 2007; 99: 839843.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Faraoni, D, Zurakowski, D, Vo, D, et al. Post-operative outcomes in children with and without congenital heart disease undergoing noncardiac surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016; 67: 793801.Google Scholar
5. Maxwell, BG, Wong, JK, Kin, C, et al. Perioperative outcomes of major noncardiac surgery in adults with congenital heart disease. Anesthesiology 2013; 119: 762769.Google Scholar
6. Aronson, S, Attarian, DE. The future of perioperative medicine. ASA Monit 2016; 80: 1618.Google Scholar
7. Guinn, NR, Guercio, JR, Hopkins, TJ, et al. How do we develop and implement a preoperative anemia clinic designed to improve perioperative outcomes and reduce cost? Transfusion 2016; 56: 297303.Google Scholar