Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

The patient encounter index: a novel method of measuring clinical workload in a paediatric cardiology service

  • Michael J. Harrison (a1), Oliver M. Barry (a2), Rachel A. Hounsell (a3) and Rik De Decker (a4)

Abstract

Technological advances have led to better patient outcomes and the expansion of clinical services in paediatric cardiology. This expansion creates an ever-growing workload for clinicians, which has led to workflow and staffing issues that need to be addressed. The objective of this study was the development of a novel tool to measure the clinical workload of a paediatric cardiology service in Cape Town, South Africa: The patient encounter index is a tool designed to quantify clinical workload. It is defined as a ratio of the measured duration of clinical work to the total time available for such work. This index was implemented as part of a prospective cross-sectional study design. Clinical workload data were collected over a 10-day period using time-and-motion sampling. Clinicians were contractually expected to spend 50% of their daily workload on patient care. The median patient encounter index for the Western Cape Paediatric Cardiac Service was 0.81 (range 0.19–1.09), reflecting that 81% of total contractual working time was spent on clinical activities. This study describes the development and implementation of a novel tool for clinical workload quantification and describes its application to a busy paediatric cardiology service in Cape Town, South Africa. This tool prospectively quantifies clinical workload which may directly influence patient outcomes. Implementation of this novel tool in the described setting clearly demonstrated the excessive workload of the clinical service and facilitated effective motivation for improved allocation of resources.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Author for correspondence: M. J. Harrison, MBChB, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Division of Cardiology, Red Cross War Memorial Children’s Hospital, Klipfontein Road, Rondebosch, Cape Town, 7700, South Africa. Tel: +27 78 120 3604; Fax: +27 21 650 7391. E-mail: michael.john.thomas.harrison@gmail.com

References

Hide All
1.Dowie, R, Mistry, H, Young, TA, et al. Telemedicine in pediatric and perinatal cardiology: economic evaluation of a service in English hospitals. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2007; 23: 116125.
2.Kleinman, CS. Chapter 18 – impact of prenatal diagnosis on the management of congenital heart disease. In: Kleinman, CS, Seri, I, eds. Hemodynamics and Cardiology: Neonatology Questions and Controversies. Saunders, Philadelphia, 2008: 323338.
3.Dubé, MP, Lipshultz, SE, Fichtenbaum, CJ, Greenberg, R, Schecter, AD, Fisher, SD. Effects of HIV infection and antiretroviral therapy on the heart and vasculature. Circulation 2008; 118: 3641.
4.Kifle, M, Mbarika, VWA, Datta, P. Interplay of cost and adoption of tele-medicine in Sub-Saharan Africa: the case of tele-cardiology in Ethiopia. Inf Syst Front 2006; 8: 211223.
5.Lubega, S, Zirembuzi, G, Lwabi, P. Heart disease among children with HIV/AIDS attending the paediatric infectious disease clinic at Mulago Hospital. Afr Health Sci 2005; 5: 219226.
6.Engel, ME, Zühlke, LJ, Robertson, K. Rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease : where are we now in South Africa? SA Hear 2009; 6: 2023.
7.Statistics South Africa. Mid-year population estimates 2019. Pretoria, 2019.
8.Statistics South Africa. Recorded live births 2017. Pretoria, 2019.
9.Zühlke, LJ, Engel, M, Watkins, D, Mayosi, B. Incidence, prevalence and outcome of rheumatic heart disease in South Africa : a systematic review of contemporary studies. Int J Cardiol 2015; 199: 375383.
10.de Cordova, PB, Lucero, RJ, Hyun, S, Quinlan, P, Price, K, Stone, P. NIH public access. J Nurs Care Qual 2010; 25: 3945.
11.Hoonakker, P, Carayon, P, Gurses, AP, Brown, R, Mcguire, K, Walker, JM. Measuring workload of ICU nurses with a questionnaire survey: the NASA Task Load Index (TLX). IIE Trans Healthc Syst Eng 2011; 1: 131143.
12.Finkler, SA, Knickman, JR, Hendrickson, G, Lipkin, M, Thompson, WG. A comparison of work-sampling and time-and-motion techniques for studies in health services research. Health Serv Res 1993; 28: 577597.
13.Lundgrén-Laine, H, Suominen, T. Nursing intensity and patient classification at an adult intensive care unit (ICU). Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2007; 23: 97103.
14.Camuci, MB, Martins, JT, Cardeli, AAM, Robazzi, ML do CC. Nursing activities score: nursing work load in a burns intensive care unit. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem 2014; 22: 325331.
15.Malstam, J, Lind, J. Therapeutic intervention scoring system: a method for measuring workload and comparing costs in the ICU. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1992; 36: 758763.
16.Kwiecien, K, Wujtewicz, M, Medrzycka-Dabrowska, W. Selected methods of measuring workload among intensive care nursing staff. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2012; 25: 209217.
17.Hendy, KC, Liao, J, Milgram, P. Combining time and intensity effects in assessing operator information-processing load. Hum Factors 1997; 39: 3047.

Keywords

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

The patient encounter index: a novel method of measuring clinical workload in a paediatric cardiology service

  • Michael J. Harrison (a1), Oliver M. Barry (a2), Rachel A. Hounsell (a3) and Rik De Decker (a4)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.