Skip to main content Accessibility help

A model for a nurse-led programme of bedside placement of peripherally inserted central catheters in neonates and infants with congenital cardiac disease

  • Deborah S. King (a1), Eduardo da Cruz (a2) and Jon Kaufman (a2)



Neonates and infants with congenital and acquired cardiac disease often require placement of central venous lines for extended intravenous therapy. It may be advantageous to avoid the larger venous vessels of the head and neck and lower extremities in order to preserve these for future interventions and therapies. We evaluated the results of a nursing led peripherally inserted central catheter team in our congenital cardiac centre.

Materials and methods

Bedside peripherally inserted central catheter the insertion procedures were evaluated for success, complications, and completion of therapy.


A total of 125 peripherally inserted central catheters were successfully placed in 105 patients. The mean age at the time of placement was 13.5 plus or minus 19.1 days; median age was 7 days; mean weight was 3.5 plus or minus 1.1 kilogram. Cyanotic cardiac disease accounted for 76% of the diagnoses. Central placement of these lines was successful in 78% of patients. Complications during insertions were limited to inadvertent arterial access in five (3%) infants and oxygen desaturations during sedation for the procedure in two (1%) patients. None of the infants suffered long-term compromise from arterial access; none required intubation for the desaturations. The team was able to respond to 90% of their requests within 24 hours. Median catheter dwell time was 14 days.


In a population of infants with cardiac disease, a nursing staffed peripherally inserted central catheter team achieved an insertion rate of 78% with few complications and a rapid response time. Reliance on bedside insertion permits continuous critical care monitoring and may eliminate the need for fluoroscopy.


Corresponding author

Correspondence to: Dr J. Kaufman, MD, The Heart Institute Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, The Children’s Hospital of Denver, School of Medicine, University of Colorado at Denver, 13123 East 16th Avenue, B-100, Aurora, Co 80045- USA. Tel: +1 720 777 6992; Fax: +1 720 777 7290; E-mail:


Hide All
1. Trotter, CW. A national survey of percutaneous central venous catheters practices in the neonates. Neonatal Netw 1998; 17: 3138.
2. Rudin, C, Nars, PW. A comparative study of two different percutaneous venous catheters in newborn infants. Eur J Pediatr 1990; 150: 119124.
3. Durand, M, Ramanathan, R, Martinelli, B, Tolentino, M. Prospective evaluation of percutaneous central venous silastic catheters in newborn infants with birthweights of 510 to 3950 grams. Pediatrics 1986; 78: 245250.
4. Dolcourt, JL, Bose, CL. Percutaneous insertion of silastic central venous catheters in newborn infants. Pediatrics 1982; 10: 484486.
5. Gamulka, B, Mendoza, C, Connolly, B. Evaluation of a unique, nurse-inserted, peripherally inserted central catheter program. Pediatrics 2005; 115: 16021606.
6. Linck, DA, Donze, A, Hamvas, A. Neonatal peripherally inserted central catheter team. Evolution and outcomes of a bedside-nurse-designed program. Adv Neonatal Care 2007; 7: 2229.
7. Tan, L, Hess, B, Diaz, LK, et al. Survey of the use of peripherally inserted central venous catheters in neonates with critical congenital cardiac disease. Cardiol Young 2007; 17: 196201.
8. Manly, L, Williams, A. The NAVAN PICC course approval program is new and improved. J Vasc Access 2000; Spring: 3435.
9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. MMWR Recomm Rep 2002; 51: 129.
10. Pettit, J. Technological advances for PICC placement and management. Adv Neonatal Care 2007; 7: 122131.
11. Frey, AM. Peripherally inserted central catheters in neonates & children: modified seldinger (Microintroducer) technique. J Vasc Access 2002; 7: 916.
12. Sansivero, GE. Use of imaging and microintroducer technology. J Vasc Access Dev 2001; 6: 713.
13. Royer, T. Nurse-driven interventional technology. J Infus Nurs 2001; 5: 326331.
14. Pettit, J. Trimming of peripherally inserted central catheters: the end result. J Assoc Vasc Access 2006; 11: 209214.
15. National Association of Vascular Access Networks. NAVAN position statement. J Vasc Access 1998; 3: 810.
16. Infusion Nursing Society. Infusion nursing society standards of practice. J Infus Nursing 2006; 29: S1S92.
17. Lewis, CA, Allen, TE, Burke, DR, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for central venous access. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14: S231S235.
18. Pettit, J, Wyckoff, MM. Peripherally inserted central catheters: guidelines for practice. Natl Assn Neonatal Nurses 2001; document 1221: 142.
19. Racadio, JM, Doellman, DA, Johnson, ND, Bean, JA, Jacobs, BR. Pediatric peripherally inserted central catheters: complications rates related to catheter tip position. Pediatrics 2001; 107: E28.
20. Kearns, P, Coleman, S, Werner, J. Complications of long arm catheters: a randomized trial of central vs peripheral tip location. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1996; 2: 2024.
21. James, L, Bledsoe, L, Hadaway, LC. A retrospective look at tip location and complications of peripherally inserted central catheter lines. J Intraven Nurs 1993; 16: 104109.
22. Fricke, BL, Racadio, JM, Duckworth, T, Donnelly, LF, Tamer, RM, Johnson, ND. Placement of peripherally inserted central catheters without fluoroscopy in children: initial catheter tip position. Radiology 2005; 234: 887892.
23. Chaturvedi, A, Bithal, PK, Dash, H, Chauhan, RS, Mohanty, B. Catheter malplacement during central venous cannulation through arm veins in pediatric patients. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2003; 15: 170175.
24. Thiagarajan, RR, Bratton, SL, Gettmann, T, Ramamoorthy, C. Efficacy of peripherally inserted central venous catheters placed in noncentral veins. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1998; 152: 436439.


A model for a nurse-led programme of bedside placement of peripherally inserted central catheters in neonates and infants with congenital cardiac disease

  • Deborah S. King (a1), Eduardo da Cruz (a2) and Jon Kaufman (a2)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed