Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T00:41:51.413Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Extremely short setting of optimal sensed atrioventricular interval in patients after Fontan procedure with implanted dual-chamber pacemaker

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 September 2019

Aya Miyazaki*
Affiliation:
Congenial Heart Disease Center, Tenri Hospital, Tenri, Nara, Japan Department of Pediatric Cardiology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan
Shin-ichiro Yoshimura
Affiliation:
Congenial Heart Disease Center, Tenri Hospital, Tenri, Nara, Japan
Hayato Matsutani
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Laboratory, Tenri Hospital, Tenri, Nara, Japan
Makoto Miyake
Affiliation:
Congenial Heart Disease Center, Tenri Hospital, Tenri, Nara, Japan
Jun Negishi
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan
Kazuo Yamanaka
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Tenri Hospital, Tenri, Nara, Japan
Osamu Yamada
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan
Hiraku Doi
Affiliation:
Congenial Heart Disease Center, Tenri Hospital, Tenri, Nara, Japan
Hideo Ohuchi
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology and Adult Congenital Heart Disease, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan
*
Author for Correspondence: A. Miyazaki, MD, Congenital Heart Disease Center, Tenri Hospital, 200 Mishima-cho, Tenri, Nara 631-8552, Japan. Tel: +81-743-63-5611; Fax: +81-743-62-1903; E-mail: ayamiya@pc4.so-net.ne.jp

Abstract

Background:

Atrioventricular interval optimisation is important in patients with dual-chamber pacing, especially with heart failure. In patients with CHD, especially in those with Fontan circulation, the systemic atrial contraction is supposed to be more important than in patients without structural heart disease.

Methods:

We retrospectively evaluated two patients after Fontan procedure with dual-chamber pacemaker with a unique setting of optimal sensed atrioventricular interval.

Results:

The optimal sensed atrioventricular interval determined by echocardiogram was extremely short sensed atrioventricular interval at 25 and 30 ms in both cases; however, the actual P wave and ventricular pacing interval showed 180 and 140 ms, respectively. In both cases, the atrial epicardial leads were implanted on the opposite site of the origin of their own atrial rhythm. The time differences between sensed atrioventricular interval and actual P wave and ventricular pacing interval occurred because of the site of the epicardial atrial pacing leads and the intra-atrial conduction delay.

Conclusion:

We need to consider the origin of the atrial rhythm, the site of the epicardial atrial lead, and the atrial conduction delay by using electrocardiogram and X-ray when we set the optimal sensed atrioventricular interval in complicated CHD.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Stanton, T, Hawkins, NM, Hogg, KJ, Goodfield, NE, Petrie, MC, McMurray, JJ. How should we optimize cardiac resynchronization therapy? Eur Heart J 2008; 29: 24582472.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Auricchio, A, Fantoni, C, Steinberg, JS. Acute and chronic sequelae of ventricular dyssynchrony. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2006; 48: 227231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bertini, M, Delgado, V, Bax, JJ, Van de Veire, NR. Why, how and when do we need to optimize the setting of cardiac resynchronization therapy? Europace 2009; 11 (Suppl 5): v46v57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ishikawa, T, Sumita, S, Kimura, K, et al. Prediction of optimal atrioventricular delay in patients with implanted DDD pacemakers. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1999; 22: 13651371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ohuchi, H. Adult patients with Fontan circulation: what we know and how to manage adults with Fontan circulation? J Cardiol 2016; 68: 181189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nothroff, J, Buchhorn, R, Ruschewski, W. Optimal atrioventricular intervals during dual chamber pacing in patients with a univentricular heart: a Doppler hemodynamic evaluation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2003; 26: 20482049.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cazeau, S, Bordachar, P, Jauvert, G, et al. Echocardiographic modeling of cardiac dyssynchrony before and during multisite stimulation: a prospective study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2003; 26: 137143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dickinson, DF, Wilkinson, JL, Anderson, KR, Smith, A, Ho, SY, Anderson, RH. The cardiac conduction system in situs ambiguus. Circulation 1979; 59: 879885.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, A, Ho, SY, Anderson, RH, et al. The diverse cardiac morphology seen in hearts with isomerism of the atrial appendages with reference to the disposition of the specialised conduction system. Cardiol Young 2006; 16: 437454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khairy, P, Van Hare, GF, Balaji, S, et al. PACES/HRS expert consensus statement on the recognition and management of arrhythmias in adult congenital heart disease: developed in partnership between the Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society (PACES) and the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS). Endorsed by the governing bodies of PACES, HRS, the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society (CHRS), and the International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease (ISACHD). Heart Rhythm 2014; 11: e102e165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, CM, Seslar, SP, den Boer, K, et al. Atrial remodeling after the Fontan operation. Am J Cardiol 2009; 104: 17371742.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mehta, D, Gilmour, S, Ward, DE, Camm, AJ. Optimal atrioventricular delay at rest and during exercise in patients with dual chamber pacemakers: a non-invasive assessment by continuous wave Doppler. Br Heart J 1989; 61: 161166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed