Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dvmhs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-22T11:12:45.726Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A European multicentric experience using the CardioSEAL® and Starflex double umbrella devices to close interatrial communications holes within the oval fossa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2008

M. Carminati
Affiliation:
San Donato Milanese, Italy
S. Giusti
Affiliation:
Massa, Italy
G. Hausdorf
Affiliation:
Hannover, Germany
S. Qureshi
Affiliation:
San Donato Milanese, Italy
M. Tynan
Affiliation:
London, United Kingdom
M. Witsenburg
Affiliation:
San Donato Milanese, Italy
J. Hess
Affiliation:
Rotterdam, The Netherlands
JF Piechaud
Affiliation:
San Donato Milanese, Italy
P. Bonhoeffer
Affiliation:
Paris, France
A. Donti
Affiliation:
Bologna, Italy
C. Ovaert
Affiliation:
Bruxelles, Belgium
H. Sievert
Affiliation:
Frankfurt, Germany
N. Elzenga
Affiliation:
San Donato Milanese, Italy
M. Talsma
Affiliation:
Groningen, The Netherlands
A. van Oort
Affiliation:
Nijmengen, The Netherlands
J. Ernst
Affiliation:
Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
M. Gewillig
Affiliation:
Leuven, Belgium
B. DeGeeter
Affiliation:
Strasbourg, France

Abstract

In this review, we describe the experience from 13 European centres using the CardioSEAL and Starflex double umbrella devices to close interatrial communications within the oval fossa (so-called ‘stcundum’ defects). Between October 1996 and April 1999, the procedure was attempted in 334 patients with a mean age of 12 years and a mean weight of 44kg. The mean measured stretched diameter of the defect was 15 mm. In the overall group, the defect was solitary in 245 patients (73%), multiple in 21 (6%), associated with an aneurysm of the flap valve in 15 (5%), was represented by patency of the oval foramen in 44 (13%), and was a fenestration in a Fontan repair in 9 (3%). In all patients, the devices were inserted under general anesthesia, using fluoroscopic and transesophageal echocardiographic control. Implantation was achieved in 325 (97,3%). The device embolized within either a few minutes or a few hours in 13 patients (4%). Of these, uncomplicated surgical repair was undertaken in 10, while the device was retrieved in 3 using catheters and a second device was successfully implanted. Residual shunting was detected immediately after the procedure in 41% of the patients, with the incidence decreasing to 31% at discharge, 24% at 1 month, 21% at 6 months, and 20.5% at one year. During the period of follow-up, elective surgical repair became necessary in two patients, due to malposition of the device in one, and late embolization in the other. Fractures of arms were seen in 6.1%, most commonly with the largest devices. All those with fractured arms of the device were asymptomatic, and no clinical complications related to the fractures were observed. There were no arrythmias, endocarditis, valvar distortion, thromboembolic events, or other complications. After one year of follow-up, clinical success, defined as complete closure of the defect or presence of only a trivial leak, had been obtained in 92.5% of the patients. We conclude, therefore, that these devices produce excellent results when used to close defects of small to moderate size. Results are less than optimal, or else complications ensure, when attempts are made to close very large defects.

Type
original-article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Bridges, ND, Newburger, JW, Mayer, JR. Transcatheter closure of the secundum ASD in the pediatric patiens: the first year's experience. Am J Cardiol 1990; 66: 522.Google Scholar
2.Lock, JE, Rome, JJ, Davis, R, et al. Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects: experimental studies. Circulation. 1989; 79: 10911099.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Rome, JJ, Keane, JF, Perry, SB, Spevak, PJ, Lock, JE. Double umbrella closure of atrial septal defects: initial experience. Circulation. 1990; 82: 751758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Latson, LA, Benson, LN, Hellenbrand, W, Mullins, CE, Lock, JE. Transcatheter closure of ASD –early results of multicenter trial of the Bard Clamshell septal occluder. Circulation. 1991; 84 SupplII: 544.Google Scholar
5.Hellenbrand, W, Fahey, JT, McGowan, FX, Weltin, GG, Kleinman, CS. Transesophageal echocardiography guidance of transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect. Am J Cardiol. 1990; 66: 207213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.King, TD, Thompson, SL, Mills, NL. Measurement of atrial septal defect during cardiac catheterization. Experimental and clinical results. Am J Cardiol 1978; 41: 537542.Google ScholarPubMed
7.Chan, KC, Godman, MJ. Morphological variations of fossa ovalis atrial septal defects (secundum): feasibility for transcutaneous closure with the clam–shell device. Br Heart J. 1993; 69: 5255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Bridges, ND, Hellenbrand, W, Latson, LA, Filiano, J, Newburger, JW, Lock, JE. Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale afterpresumedparadoxicalembolism.Circulation 1992:86:19021908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Kaulitz, R, Paul, T, Hausdorf, G. Extending the limits of transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects with double umbrella device (CardioSEAL). Heart. 1998; 80: 5459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Landzberg, MI, Sloss, U, Faherty, CE, et al. Orthodeoxiaplatypnea due to intracardiac shunting-relief with transcatheter double umbrella closure. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1995; 36: 247250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Boutin, C, Musewe, NN, Smallhorn, JF, Dyck, JD, Kobayashi, T, Benson, LN. Echocardiographic follow–up of atrial septal defect after catheter closure by double umbrella device; Circulation. 1993; 88: 621627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Hausdorf, G, Kaulitz, R, Paul, T, Carminati, M, Lock, J. Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect with a new flexible, self centering device: initial experience with the Starflex Occluder. Am J Cardiol 1999, 84: 11131116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar