Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T09:56:12.444Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coarctation of the aorta-stenting via Glidesheath Slender in a newborn with recoarctation early after a Norwood operation

Part of: Aortic Coarctation Interventional Cardiology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2017

Katarzyna Gendera ,
Julie Cleuziou  and
Daniel Tanase
Katarzyna Gendera*
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Defects, German Heart Centre, Munich, Germany
Julie Cleuziou
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, German Heart Centre, Munich, Germany
Daniel Tanase
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Defects, German Heart Centre, Munich, Germany
*
Correspondence to: K. Gendera, Deutsches Herzzentrum Munchen, Paediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Defects, Lazarettstra e 36, Munchen, 80636, Germany. E-mail: gendera.kasia@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article, we report on a newborn with hypoplastic left heart syndrome in whom recoarctation of the aorta was treated with a bare metal stent (Cook Formula 414 Stent) in the early postoperative period after a Norwood procedure. To reduce the risk for scarring and occluding the femoral artery the stent was implanted via 5F Glidesheath Slender sheath.

Keywords

Coarctation of aortaCHDbare metal stent
Type
Brief Report
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , February 2018 , pp. 347 - 350
Check for updates
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Bloom, JD, Mozersky, DJ, Buckley, CJ, Hagood, CO Jr. Defective limb growth as a complication of catheterization of the femoral artery. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1974; 138: 524–526.Google ScholarPubMed
2. Zeltser, I, Menteer, J, Gaynor, JW, et al. Impact of re-coarctation following the Norwood operation on survival in the balloon angioplasty era. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45: 1844–1848.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Zellers, TM. Balloon angioplasty for recurrent coarctation of the aorta in patients following staged palliation for hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Am J Cardiol 1999; 84: 231–233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Ibarra-Pérez, C, Castañeda, AR, Varco, RL, Walton Lillehei, C. Recoarctation of the aorta. Am J Cardiol 1969; 23: 778–784.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Cleuziou, J, Kasnar-Samprec, J, Horer, J, Eicken, A, Lange, R, Schreiber, C. Recoarctation after the Norwood I procedure for hypoplastic left heart syndrome: incidence, risk factors, and treatment options. Ann Thorac Surg 2013; 95: 935–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Forbes, TJ, Kim, DW, Du, W, et al. Comparison of surgical, stent, and balloon angioplasty treatment of native coarctation of the aorta: an observational study by the CCISC (Congenital Cardiovascular Interventional Study Consortium). J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58: 2664–2674.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Aminian, A, Dolatabadi, D, Lefebvre, P, et al. Initial experience with the glidesheath slender for transradial coronary angiography and intervention: a feasibility study with prospective radial ultrasound follow-up. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2014; 84: 436–442.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Mann, C, Goebel, G, Eicken, A, et al. Balloon dilation for aortic recoarctation: morphology at the site of dilation and long-term efficacy. Cardiol Young 2001; 11: 30–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Eicken, A, Pensl, U, Sebening, W, et al. The fate of systemic blood pressure in patients after effectively stented coarctation. Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 1100–1105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Zanjani, KS, Sabi, T, Moysich, A, et al. Feasibility and efficacy of stent redilatation in aortic coarctation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2008; 72: 552–556.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed