Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T06:20:49.426Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Lattice Point Problem Related to Sets Containing No l-Term Arithmetic Progression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

J. Riddell
J. Riddell*
Affiliation:
University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In 1927 van der Waerden [6] proved that given positive integers k and l, there exists an integer W such that if 1, 2, …, W are partitioned into k or fewer classes, then at least one class contains an l-term arithmetic progression (l-progression). Let W(k, l), be the smallest such integer W. It would be of interest to find a reasonable upper estimate for W(k, l), say one that could be written down.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Mathematical Bulletin , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , December 1971 , pp. 535 - 538
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1971

References

1. Hales, A. W. and Jewett, R. I., Regularity and positional games, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 106 (1963), 222-229.Google Scholar
2. Rankin, R. A., Sets of integers containing not more than a given number of terms in arithmetical progression, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A., 65 (1962), 332-344.Google Scholar
3. Robbins, H., A remark on Stirling's formula, Amer. Math. Monthly 62 (1955), 26-29.Google Scholar
4. Roth, K. F., On certain sets of integers, J. London Math. Soc. 28 (1953), 104-109.Google Scholar
5. Szemerédi, E., On sets of integers containing no four elements in arithmetic progression, Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hung. 20 (1969), 89-104.Google Scholar
6. van der Waerden, B. L., Beweis einer Baude'schen Vermutung, Nieuw Arch. Wisk. Ser. 2 15 (1927), 212-216.Google Scholar