Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Information:

  • Access

Actions:

      • Send article to Kindle

        To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

        Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

        Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

        The Short Performance Physical Battery Is Associated with One-Year Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalization
        Available formats
        ×

        Send article to Dropbox

        To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

        The Short Performance Physical Battery Is Associated with One-Year Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalization
        Available formats
        ×

        Send article to Google Drive

        To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

        The Short Performance Physical Battery Is Associated with One-Year Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalization
        Available formats
        ×
Export citation

Abstract

Tools applied at the point of care can provide valuable prognostic information for practitioners. In this one-year, prospective observational study, we examined the association of the short performance physical battery (SPPB) and one-year emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations. Overall, 191 new referrals attending an outpatient geriatric clinic in Hamilton, Ontario, were approached, and 120 were enrolled. SPPB and other assessments were completed during the routine clinical visit. ED visits and hospitalizations within one year of the baseline assessment were abstracted from electronic medical records. Logistic regression analyses were used to determine ED visits and hospitalization predictors. The mean SPPB score in the study cohort (mean age 80.6, SD 6.3 years; 53% female) was 6.3 (SD 3.2). SPPB score was associated with a one-year ED visit (OR = 0.90 [0.78–1.03]) and hospitalization (OR = 0.84 [0.72–0.97]) after adjusting for age, sex, and co-morbidities.

Footnotes

*

This study was funded by a research grant from the Research Strategic Initiatives Grant Program, Hamilton Health Sciences. The sponsors had no role in the design and conduct of the study; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the preparation of the manuscript; or in the review or approval of the manuscript.

All the authors have no competing interests to declare.

Introduction

Screening tools that predict adverse health outcomes are helpful in making decisions regarding care plans and in better predicting a patient’s trajectory. For geriatric medicine outpatient services, which have limited capacity in Canada (Heckman, Molnar, & Lee, 2013), tools applied at the point of care can provide valuable prognostic information for practitioners.

Most patients referred to a geriatric clinic have already experienced a decline in mobility and/or cognition and may have early or advanced degrees of frailty. A better understanding of physical and functional performance can guide interventions and referrals that target maintenance or improvement of functional activities. This may be a particularly important goal for community-dwelling seniors who wish to remain independent. In addition to questionnaires related to activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), functional evaluation can be characterized via objective physical performance measures (Guralnik, Ferrucci, Simonsick, Salive, & Wallace, 1995).

The short performance physical battery (SPPB) is an objective physical performance measure focused on lower extremities physical function and measures balance, strength, and coordination (Guralnik et al., 1994) which are important contributors to mobility and independence (Guralnik et al., 1994). The SPPB has been well validated in higher functioning community-dwelling cohorts of older adults and is predictive of falls (Veronese et al., 2014), subsequent disability (Guralnik et al., 1995), ADL difficulty (Guralnik et al., 1994), and death (Guralnik et al., 1995; Perera, Mody, Woodman, & Studenski, 2006). It has been less widely examined as a prognostic tool in frailer patients referred for geriatric consultation. In this already at-risk cohort of older adults, whether the SPPB provides additional prognostic information needs further consideration. Thus, the objective of this study was to examine the association of the SPPB and one-year emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations in geriatric medicine outpatients.

Materials and Methods

We performed a prospective, one-year study of new referrals attending an outpatient geriatric clinic in Hamilton, Ontario. Participants were referred to the geriatrician for a variety of issues including falls, cognitive impairment, and need for a medication review. The only exclusions criteria for enrolling in the study were non-English speaking with no translator or being deemed not suitable for participation by the clinical staff due to severe cognitive impairment or agitation.

During the routine clinic appointment, a research assistant obtained informed consent and administered the SPPB. This performance-based tool is a continuous measure with scores ranging from 0–12. From previous validation (Bandinelli et al., 2006; Subra et al., 2012), scores of 0–4, 5–8, and 9–12 indicate poor, intermediate, and good lower extremities function respectively. The research assistant also administered the Fried frailty phenotype tool (energy, physical activity, body mass, strength, and walking speed) (Fried et al., 2001). The clinic staff routinely administers and collects the Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test, Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), co-morbidities, height and weight, demographic information, and a full medication list.

The primary outcomes, ED visits, and hospitalizations within one year of the baseline assessment were abstracted from the hospital’s electronic records of residents of Hamilton and South Central Ontario, Canada.

Univariable analyses were based on non-missing observations for each variable to select significant confounders for the multivariable analysis. We used multiple logistic regression analyses to examine the relationship between SPPB and (a) ED visits (yes/no) and (b) hospitalizations (yes/no) over a one-year period. Co-variates included age, sex, Fried frailty phenotype, Lawton IADL, TUG, number of medications, MMSE, and number of co-morbidities. No significant collinearity was found in the full model tested by variance inflation factor (VIF) (VIF < 2). Odds ratios and 95 per cent confidence intervals were calculated. The Hamilton Health Sciences/McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences Research Ethics Board approved this study (File #: 13-344).

Results

Overall, we approached 191 patients to participate in the study. Of those patients, 36 were not interested, 35 were excluded, and 120 were included in the study. Reasons for exclusion were being not suitable for participation or unable to provide consent (n = 28) and not speaking English/no translator (n = 7). In this cohort (mean age 80.6, SD 6.3 years; 53.3% women), over 90 per cent were pre-frail or frail, and 40 per cent, 28 per cent, and 32 per cent had good, intermediate, and poor lower extremities function respectively. There were no deaths or loss of follow-up at one year. Reasons for ED visits (n = 54) included infection, surgery, neurological complaints, musculoskeletal complaints, cardiac problems, diabetic hyperglycemia, and others. Reasons for hospitalizations (n = 42) included infection, surgery, cardiac complications, falls, fractures, diabetic complications, and others. Descriptive characteristics are presented in Table 1.

Table 1: Baseline characteristics of included participants

Note. Data are expressed as mean (standard deviation), unless otherwise specified.

Univariable Analyses

The results of univariable analyses are provided in Table 2. SPPB was associated with both ED visits and hospitalizations. The Fried frailty phenotype was associated with hospitalization only.

Table 2: Summary of univariable analysis and final model for hospitalization and Emergency Department (ED) visit prediction

Note. a Variables were included in the model as continuous variables except sex, which was included as a categorical variable; b = significant difference (p < .05); c Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living.

Multivariable Analyses

Age, sex, co-morbidities, and all the variables significantly associated with ED visits and hospitalizations in univariable regression analysis were included in the multivariable analysis. Although we evaluated Fried frailty phenotype in the multivariable analysis, we did not retain it in the final model because Fried frailty phenotype and SPPB have similar components (such as a walk test). Age, sex, and co-morbidities were retained in the final model as they are important confounders of physical performance, hospitalizations, and ED visits (Alexandre et al., 2018; Mondor et al., 2017). Using non-missing observations (n = 101), age-, sex-, and co-morbidities–adjusted SPPB showed a higher predictive ability and were included as the final model to predict ED visits and hospitalizations (Table 2). Per 1-point increase in SPPB, the odds of hospitalization and ED visits decreased by 16 per cent and 10 per cent respectively.

Discussion

In this study population, the SPPB was associated with ED visits and hospitalizations. However, other frailty and functional performance measures such as Fried frailty phenotype, Lawton IADL, and TUG were not associated with ED visits and hospitalizations.

In Canada, there are limited resources for geriatric care with long wait lists to be seen by a geriatrician due to a geriatrician shortage (Heckman et al., 2013). This critical shortage and long wait lists will be escalating as a result of the increasing number of Canadian older adults and limited number of certified specialists in geriatric medicine (only 242 geriatricians) (Hogan et al., 2012). A tool that identifies those at risk of ED visits, hospitalizations, and other unfavourable health outcomes may save geriatricians’ time by allowing them to identify and support patients at risk using tailored interventions (including care plans and other referrals) (Bandinelli et al., 2006). For example, SPPB could be used to triage patients so that only patients at risk of ED visits and hospitalization would be seen and followed up closely by geriatricians.

A recent randomized, controlled trial showed that a multicomponent intervention is effective in improving lower extremities function of older adults measured by SPPB (Cameron et al., 2013). Improving lower extremities function (measured by SPPB scores) by 1 or 2 points results in clinically meaningful changes in the risk of disability and death among older adults (Guralnik et al., 1995; Perera et al., 2006). Therefore, tracking lower extremities function of older adults visiting geriatric clinics using the predictive value of SPPB could optimize geriatric care and identify older adults who need interventions to enhance their function and independence.

This is the first Canadian study to show the predictive value of the SPPB in a population with an already high degree of frailty and mobility impairments. This pragmatic study had minimal exclusion criteria to increase the generalizability of our results to people visiting specialist geriatric clinics. We used hospital administrative data to collect ED visits and hospitalizations to avoid any recall bias. The limitations of this study included (a) having a small sample size; (b) missing data of some baseline variables such as Lawton IADL and TUG; and (c) the clinical staff’s excluding participants if they could not implement the study measurements due to agitation or severe cognitive impairment. This latter exclusion criterion needed clinical judgment, which may not have been consistent across the clinical staff. Although it is unlikely, the included participants might have visited another ED that is not captured in our hospital record, which may underestimate the ED visit number in this study. Future studies should consider SPPB responsiveness to change, particularly in response to interventions to reduce frailty and improve lower extremities function.

Conclusion

In older adults with an already high degree of frailty and impairment, age-, sex-, and co-morbidities–adjusted SPPB provided additional prognostic information regarding ED visits and hospitalizations. Further studies are required to develop and validate a predictive model for ED visits and hospitalization using SPPB scores.

References

Alexandre, T. D. S., Corona, L. P., Brito, T. R. P., Santos, J. L. F., Duarte, Y. A. O., & Lebrao, M. L. (2018). Gender differences in the incidence and determinants of components of the frailty phenotype among older adults: Findings from the SABE study. Journal of Aging and Health, 30(2), 190212. doi:10.1177/0898264316671228
Bandinelli, S., Lauretani, F., Boscherini, V., Gandi, F., Pozzi, M., Corsi, A. M., … Ferrucci, L. (2006). A randomized, controlled trial of disability prevention in frail older patients screened in primary care: The FRASI study. Design and baseline evaluation. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 18(5), 359366.
Cameron, I. D., Fairhall, N., Langron, C., Lockwood, K., Monaghan, N., Aggar, C., … Kurrle, S. E. (2013). A multifactorial interdisciplinary intervention reduces frailty in older people: Randomized trial. BMC Medicine, 11(1), 65.
Fried, L. P., Tangen, C. M., Walston, J., Newman, A. B., Hirsch, C., Gottdiener, J., … Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. (2001). Frailty in older adults: Evidence for a phenotype. Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological and Medical Sciences, 56(3), M146156.
Guralnik, J. M., Ferrucci, L., Simonsick, E. M., Salive, M. E., & Wallace, R. B. (1995). Lower-extremity function in persons over the age of 70 years as a predictor of subsequent disability. New England Journal of Medicine, 332(9), 556561. doi:10.1056/NEJM199503023320902
Guralnik, J. M., Simonsick, E. M., Ferrucci, L., Glynn, R. J., Berkman, L. F., Blazer, D. G., … Wallace, R. B. (1994). A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: Association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. Journal of Gerontology, 49(2), M8594.
Heckman, G. A., Molnar, F. J., & Lee, L. (2013). Geriatric medicine leadership of health care transformation: To be or not to be? Canadian Journal of Geriatrics, 16(4), 192195. doi:10.5770/cgj.16.89
Hogan, D. B., Borrie, M., Basran, J. F., Chung, A. M., Jarrett, P. G., Morais, J. A., … Woolmore-Goodwin, S. (2012). Specialist physicians in geriatrics-report of the Canadian geriatrics society physician resource work group. Canadian Journal of Geriatrics, 15(3), 6879. doi:10.5770/cgj.15.41
Mondor, L., Maxwell, C. J., Hogan, D. B., Bronskill, S. E., Gruneir, A., Lane, N. E., & Wodchis, W. P. (2017). Multimorbidity and healthcare utilization among home care clients with dementia in Ontario, Canada: A retrospective analysis of a population-based cohort. PLoS Medicine, 14(3), e1002249. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002249
Perera, S., Mody, S. H., Woodman, R. C., & Studenski, S. A. (2006). Meaningful change and responsiveness in common physical performance measures in older adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 54(5), 743749. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00701.x
Subra, J., Gillette-Guyonnet, S., Cesari, M., Oustric, S., Vellas, B., & Platform, T. (2012). The integration of frailty into clinical practice: Preliminary results from the Gérontopôle. The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging, 16(8), 714720. doi:10.1007/s12603-012-0391-7
Veronese, N., Bolzetta, F., Toffanello, E. D., Zambon, S., De Rui, M., Perissinotto, E., … Manzato, E. (2014). Association between Short Physical Performance Battery and falls in older people: The Progetto Veneto Anziani Study. Rejuvenation Research, 17(3), 276284. doi:10.1089/rej.2013.149