Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T18:55:47.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Changes in Family Involvement Following a Relative's Move to a Long-Term Care Facility*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2010

James W. Gladstone ,
Sherry L. Dupuis  and
Evelyn Wexler
James W. Gladstone*
Affiliation:
School of Social Work, McMaster University
Sherry L. Dupuis
Affiliation:
Murray Alzheimer Research and Education Program, University of Waterloo
Evelyn Wexler
Affiliation:
Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Humber College
*
Requests for offprints should be sent to: / Les demandes de tirés-à-part doivent être addressées à : Professor James W. Gladstone, School of Social Work, KTH-319, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4M4. (jwgladstone@aol.com)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine changes in family involvement following a relative's move to a long-term care facility as well as factors associated with these changes. Qualitative data, using in-depth, active interviews were gathered from 35 family members at two points in time following a relative's move to a facility. Findings showed some changes in contact that were related to personal, social, institutional, and health conditions. Occasionally, new types of care were provided; more often care was rebalanced or expressed in alternative ways. The majority of participants did not view themselves as caregivers, a perception that remained stable over time. Consistent with continuity theory, families, in most cases, tended to seek ways to maintain consistency in their roles as family members and carers, particularly in the first year or so after placement. Nonetheless, facility staff should be aware of the factors that might influence changes over time in family caregiving roles and offer support to families dealing with these issues.

Résumé

L'objectif de cette étude consistait à étudier les changements dans la participation de la famille après le déménagement d'un proche dans un établissement de soins de longue durée ainsi que les facteurs liés à ces changements. Des données quantitatives fondées sur des entrevues actives et approfondies ont été recueillies auprès de 35 membres des familles des patients à deux moments différents après le déménagement de leur proche dans un établissement. Les résultats révèlent certains changements, en matière de contacts, liés aux conditions personnelles, sociales, institutionnelles et médicales. Dans certains cas, de nouveaux types de soins ont été fournis ; dans la plupart des cas les soins ont été redéfinis ou fournis de manières différentes. La plupart des participants ne se voyaient pas comme des prestataires de soins, une perception qui est restée stable au cours du temps. Conformément à la théorie de la continuité, dans la plupart des cas, les familles cherchaient à trouver des manières d'adopter une approche constante en ce qui a trait à leurs rô les de proches et de soignants, surtout au cours de la première année qui a suivi le placement. Le personnel des établissements devrait néanmoins être conscient des facteurs qui peuvent causer des changements au cours du temps, du point de vue du rô le joué par la famille en matière de soins, et offrir du soutien aux familles qui doivent gérer ces questions.

Keywords

agingfamilydementiarole perceptioncontinuity theoryvieillissementfamilledémenceperception des rô lesthéorie de la continuite
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , Spring/Printemps 2006 , pp. 93 - 106
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The authors would like to thank the Alzheimer Society of Canada, Grant #00–05, for their generous support to conduct this research.

References

Aneshensel, C.S., Pearlin, L.I., Mullan, J.T., Zarit, S.H., & Whitlatch, C.J. (1995). Profiles in caregiving: The unexpected career. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Atchley, R.C. (1989). A continuity theory of normal aging. The Gerontologist, 29, 183–190.Google Scholar
Atchley, R.C. (1999a). Continuity and adaptation in aging: Creating positive experiences. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Atchley, R.C. (1999b). Continuity theory, self, and social structure. In Ryff, C.D. & Marshall, V.W. (Eds.), The self and society in aging processes (pp. 94–121). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Becker, G. (1993). Continuity after a stroke: Implications of life-course disruption in old age. The Gerontologist, 33, 148–158.Google Scholar
Bitzan, J.E., & Kruzich, J.M. (1990). Interpersonal relationships of nursing home residents. The Gerontologist, 30, 385–390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowers, B.J. (1988). Family perceptions of care in a nursing home. The Gerontologist, 28, 361–368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brody, E.M., Dempsey, N.P., & Pruchno, R.A. (1990). Mental health of sons and daughters of the institutionalized aged. The Gerontologist, 30, 212–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bury, M. (1995). Ageing, gender and sociological theory. In Arber, S. & Ginn, J. (Eds.), Connecting gender and ageing: A sociological approach (pp. 15–30). Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Chang, C.F., & White-Means, S.I. (1991). The men who care: An analysis of male primary caregivers who care for frail elderly at home. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 10, 343–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, D. (2000). Caregivers for persons with Alzheimer's disease. Current Psychiatry Reports, 2, 32–39.Google Scholar
Crispi, E., & Heitner, G. (2002). An activity-based intervention for caregivers and residents with dementia in nursing homes. Activities, Adaptation, and Aging, 26, 61–72.Google Scholar
Dempsey, N.P., & Pruchno, R.A. (1993). The family's role in the nursing home: Predictors of technical and non-technical assistance. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 21, 127–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, M.T., & Morgan, D.L. (1994). Sharing the caring: Family caregivers' views of their relationships with nursing home staff. The Gerontologist, 34, 235–244.Google Scholar
Dupuis, S.L. (2002). The roles of adult sons in institution-based elder care. Innovations: Enhancing Ability in Dementia Care, 1, 2.Google Scholar
Dupuis, S.L., & Norris, J.E. (1997). A multidimensional and contextual framework for understanding diverse family members' roles in long-term care facilities. Journal of Aging Studies, 11, 297–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupuis, S.L., & Norris, J.E. (2001). The roles of adult daughters in long-term care facilities: Alternative role manifestations. Journal of Aging Studies, 15(1), 27–54.Google Scholar
Dupuis, S.L., & Pedlar, A. (1995). Family leisure programs in institutional care settings: Buffering the stress of caregivers. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 29, 184–205.Google Scholar
Edelson, J.S., & Lyons, W.H. (1985). Institutional care of the mentally impaired elderly. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
Fry, P.S. (1992). Major social theories of aging and their implications for counseling concepts and practice: A critical review. The Counseling Psychologist, 20, 246–329.Google Scholar
Gladstone, J.W. (1995). The marital perceptions of elderly persons living or having a spouse living in Canada. The Gerontologist, 35, 52–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gladstone, J.W., & Wexler, E. (2002). Exploring the relationships between families and staff caring for residents in long-term care facilities: Family members' perspectives. Canadian Journal on Aging, 21, 39–46.Google Scholar
Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. New York: Aldine.Google Scholar
Gottesman, L.E. (1974). Nursing home performance as related to resident traits, ownership, size and source of payment. American Journal of Public Health, 64, 269–276.Google Scholar
Greene, V.L., & Monahan, D.J. (1982). The impact of visitation on patient well-being in nursing homes. The Gerontologist, 22, 418–423.Google Scholar
Gubrium, J.F., & Holstein, J.A. (1997). The new language of qualitative method. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harel, Z. (1981). Quality of care, congruence, and well-being among institutionalized aged. The Gerontologist, 21, 523–531.Google Scholar
Holstein, J.A., & Gubrium, J.F. (1995). The active interview. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hook, W.F., Sobal, J., & Oak, J.C. (1982). Frequency of visitation in nursing homes: Patterns of contact across the boundaries of total institutions. The Gerontologist, 22, 424–427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kayser-Jones, J. (2002). The experience of dying: An ethnographic nursing home study. The Gerontologist, 42, 11–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keating, N., Fast, J., Fredrick, M., Cranswick, K., & Perrier, C. (1999). Eldercare in Canada: Context, content and consequences. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
Kellett, U.M. (1998). Meaning-making for family carers in nursing homes. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 4, 113–119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kincheloe, J.L., & McLaren, P.L. (1994). Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In Denzin, N.K. & Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 138–157). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Linsk, N., Miller, B., Pflaum, R., & Vicik, A. (1988). Families, Alzheimer's disease, and nursing homes. The Journal of Applied Gerontology, 7, 331–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luborsky, M.R. (1994). The identification and analysis of themes and patterns. In Gubrium, J.F. & Sankar, A. (Eds.), Qualitative methods in aging research (pp. 189–210). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Montgomery, R.J.V. (1983). Staff-family relations and institutional care policies. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 6, 25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolan, M., & Grant, G. (1995). Developing a typology of family care: Implications for nurses and other service providers. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 21, 256–265.Google Scholar
Patterson, J.M. (1988). Chronic illness in children and the impact on families. In Chilman, C.S., Nunnally, E.W., & Cox, F.M. (Eds.), Families in trouble series: Vol. 2, Chronic illness and disability (pp. 69–107). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Port, C.L., Gruber-Baldini, A.L., Burton, L., Baumgarten, M., Hebel, J.R., Zimmerman, S.I. et al. (2001). Resident contact with family and friends following nursing home admission. The Gerontologist, 41, 589–596.Google Scholar
Pratt, C.C., Schmall, V.L., Wright, S., & Cleland, M. (1985). Burden and coping strategies of caregivers to Alzheimer's patients. Family Relations, 34, 27–33.Google Scholar
Quayhagen, M.P., & Quayhagen, M. (1989). Differential effects of family-based strategies on Alzheimer's disease. The Gerontologist, 29, 150–155Google Scholar
Reker, G.T. (1997). Personal meaning, optimism, and choice: Existential predictors of depression in community and institutional elderly. The Gerontologist, 37, 709–716.Google Scholar
Riddick, C., Cohen-Mansfield, J., Fleshener, E., & Kraft, G. (1992). Caregiver adaptations to having a relative with dementia admitted to a nursing home. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 19, 51–75.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, C.J. (1985). Kinkeeping in the familial division of labor. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 965–974.Google Scholar
Ross, M.M., Rosenthal, C.J., & Dawson, P.G. (1997). Spousal caregiving in the institutional setting: Task performance. Canadian Journal on Aging, 16, 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schatzman, L., & Strauss, A.A. (1973). Field research: Strategies for a natural sociology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Schwandt, T.A. (1994). Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In Denzin, N.K. & Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 118–137). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Schwartz, A.N., & Vogel, M.E. (1990). Nursing home staff and residents' families role expectations. The Gerontologist, 30, 49–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shuttlesworth, G.E., Rubin, A., & Duffy, M. (1982). Families versus institutions: Incongruent role expectations in the nursing home. The Gerontologist, 22, 200–208.Google Scholar
Smith, K.F., & Bengtson, V.L. (1979). Positive consequences of institutionalization: Solidarity between elderly parents and their middle-aged children. The Gerontologist, 19, 438–447.Google Scholar
Stephens, M.A.P., Kinney, J.M., & Ogrocki, P.K. (1991). Stressors and well-being among caregivers to older adults with dementia: The in-home versus nursing home experience. The Gerontologist, 31, 217–223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stoller, E. (1990). Males as helpers: The role of sons, relatives and friends. The Gerontologist, 30, 228–235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
Tornatore, J.B., & Grant, L.A. (2002). Burden among family caregivers of persons with Alzheimer's disease in nursing homes. The Gerontologist, 42, 497–506.Google Scholar
Whitlach, C.J., Schur, D., Noelker, L.S., Ejaz, F.K., & Looman, W.J. (2001). The stress process of family caregiving in institutional settings. The Gerontologist, 32, 665–672.Google Scholar
Yamamoto-Mitani, N., Aneshensel, C.S., & Levy-Storms, L. (2002). Patterns of family visiting with institutionalized elders: The case of dementia. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 57B, S234–S246.Google Scholar
Zarit, S.H., & Whitlatch, C.J. (1992). Institutional placement: Phases of the transition. The Gerontologist, 32, 665–672.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed