Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T11:17:44.223Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool Andrew Bennett and Jeffrey T. Checkel , eds. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press, 2015, pp. 342.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 October 2016

Pierre-Marc Daigneault
Pierre-Marc Daigneault*
Affiliation:
Université Laval
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews/Recensions
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 49 , Issue 4 , December 2016 , pp. 795 - 797
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brady, Henry E. and Collier, David, eds. 2004. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Lanham MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Daigneault, Pierre-Marc and Béland, Daniel. 2015. “Taking Explanation Seriously in Political Science.” Political Studies Review 13(3):384–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O. and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, Craig. 2007. How to Map Arguments in Political Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar