Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T21:07:01.880Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New Forms of Political Representation: European Ecological Politics and the Montreal Citizen's Movement*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2009

Timothy Thomas
Timothy Thomas
Affiliation:
Royal Military College of Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In his examinations of the ecological parties of Belgium and West Germany, Herbert Kitschelt argues that he has found a new form of political representation that defies patterns of behaviour outlined for political parties by all previous scholarly work. These parties, which Kitschelt calls “left-libertarian,” are unique because they lack the organizational structures common to traditional parties, and include in their membership constituencies that are normally more comfortable in social movements. This article compares the political platforms of these parties and the sociological characteristics of their activists with those of the Montreal Citizen's Movement (MCM) and concludes that the MCM is indeed a left-libertarian party. However, an examination of the MCM reveals that although Kitschelt has found a new form of political representation in the left-libertarian party, this new form does not actually defy the developmental patterns outlined by the classical studies of political parties.

Résumé

Herbert Kitschelt a démontré par ses études des partis écologistes de Belgique et d'Allemagne de l'Ouest qu'il existe maintenant de nouvelles formes de représentation politique qui ne ressemblent en rien au type de comportement organisationnel généralement identifié par la litérature qui fait autorité à l'égard des partis politiques. Ces partis, que Kitschelt qualifie de «libertaires de gauche », sont uniques en ce qu'ils n'affichent pas les structures organisationnelles que l'on retrouve généralement dans les partis traditionnels et s'appuient sur des effectifs qui s'identifient plus volontiers aux mouvements sociaux. Cet article compare les programmes politiques de ces partis et les caractéristiques sociologiques de leurs militants avec ceux du Rassemblement des citoyens de Montréal (RCM). Il conclut que le RCM s'apparente en effet à un parti libertaire de gauche. Toutefois, bien que Kitschelt ait associé le parti libertaire de gauche typique à l'émergence de nouvelles formes de représentation, un examen attentif du RCM révèle que ces nouvelles formes ne remettent pas nécessairement en question le mode de développement organisationnel mis en relief par les études classiques des partis politiques.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 28 , Issue 3 , September 1995 , pp. 509 - 531
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Kitschelt, Herbert, The Logics of Party Formation (London: Cornell University Press, 1989), viiGoogle Scholar.

2 Ibid., vii–viii.

3 Ibid., 2,276.

4 Ibid., 2,75–97.

5 Ibid., 3.

6 Ibid.

7 Ibid., 4.

8 Ibid.

9 Ibid., 285.

10 See Dickerson, M. O., Drabek, S. and Woods, J. T., eds., Problems of Change in Urban Government (Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 1980)Google Scholar.

11 Higgins, Donald, “Progressive City Politics and the Citizen Movement: A Status Report,” City Magazine, Annual Review 5 (1981), 89Google Scholar.

12 Chorney, Harold and Molloy, Andrew, “Boss Politics and Quebec Nationalism, Jean Drapeau to Jean Doré: The Pre-modern to the Post-modern,” in Gagnon, Alain G., ed., Quebec State and Society (2nd ed.; Scarborough: Nelson, 1993), 72Google Scholar.

13 This becomes especially apparent when one examines the curriculum vitae of MCM candidates for the 1974 election as well as for later years. It should also be noted that many MCM candidates involved in unions and political parties were also active in community groups and CLSCs (Centre Local de Services Sociaux et Communautaires). All of the MCM statistics and data in this article come from the curriculum vitae of all MCM candidates for each election from 1974–1990.

14 Milner, Henry, “City Politics—Some Possibilities,” Our Generation 6 (1974), 59Google Scholar.

15 Collin, Jean-Pierre and Godbout, Jacques, Les organismes populaires en milieu urbain: contre-pouvoir ou nouvelle pratique professionelle? (Montréal: Institut national de la recherche scientifique, 1977), 231–232Google Scholar.

16 Raboy, Marc, “The Future of Montreal and the MCM,” in Roussopoulos, Dimitrios, ed., The City and Social Change (Montreal: Black Rose Books, 1982), 237–238Google Scholar.

17 Quoted in Maillé, Chantal and Tardy, Évelyne, Militer dans un parti municipal: Les différences entre lesfemmes et les hommes au R.C.M., au R.P. de Québec et l'Action civique Lasalle (Montréal: Centre de recherche féministe, Université du Québec à Montréal, 1988), 175Google Scholar.

18 Milner, Henry, ”The MCM: Back to the Drawing Board,” City Magazine, April 1979, 37–41Google Scholar.

19 Milner, ”City Politics,” 57.

20 Kitschelt, The Logics of Party Formation, 93.

21 Milner, ”City Politics,” 58.

22 Ibid.

23 Chorney and Molloy, ”Boss Politics,” 73.

24 Changeons Montréal pour vrai, le programme de gouvernement du Rassemblement des Citoyens de Montreal (Montreal: Journal Offset, 1978)Google Scholar.

25 Votez pour vous, Votez R. CM., Jean Doré la Maire (Montreal: Copibec, 1982)Google Scholar.

26 Ibid.

27 This development, cited in Harris, Lewis, ”MCM Puts Radical Planks of Platform on Hold,” The Gazette (Montreal), September 18, 1986, F-12Google Scholar, marked an important symbolic moment in the history of the MCM, and although its occurrence did not substantially alter the party's overall policy emphasis, it did have a lasting impact on the party's internal dynamic.

28 See, Action RCM Montréal, Les priorités d'action pour un premier mandat d'une administration du Rassemblement des Citoyens et des Citoyennes de Montréal, Montreal, October 29, 1986Google Scholar.

29 Roussopoulos, Dimitrios, ”Montreal after Drapeau,” City Magazine, Winter 1986/1987, 34Google Scholar.

30 See RCM, RCM, Plate-forme électorate, Adoptée par le Congres spécial 7–8 septembre 1990 (Montreal, September 09, 1990)Google Scholar.

31 Kitschelt, The Logics of Party Formation, 120–28.

32 Maillé and Tardy, Militerdans unparti municipal, 165.

33 MCM, 1974–1989, Fifteen years of political activity for Montreal (anniversary document sponsored and published by MCM local associations, Rivière-des-Prairies and Marc-Aurele-Fortin, 1989), 6.

34 Rowan, Renée, ”Les femmes sont absentes de la Ville, juge le RCM,” Le Devoir (Montreal), February 24, 1986, 2Google Scholar.

35 Cahier a'information de la campagne électorate municipale du 4 novembre 1990 (Montreal: RCM, 1990)Google Scholar.

36 See Bashevkin, Sylvia, ”Political Parties and the Representation of Women,” in Gagnon, Alain G. and Tanguay, A. Brian, eds., Canadian Parties in Transition (Scarborough: Nelson, 1989)Google Scholar, Table 19–4.

37 Quesnel-Ouellet, Louise, ”Les partis politiques locaux au Québec,” in Lemieux, V., ed., Personnel et partis politiques au Québec (Montréal: Boréal Express, 1982), 299Google Scholar.

38 Kitschelt, The Logics of Party Formation, 126.

39 Ibid., 105–08.

40 Milner, ”City Politics,” 59.

41 Kitschelt, The Logics of Party Formation, 104.

42 Ibid., 88–105.

43 Hamel, Pierre, Action collective et démocratie locale (dans les mouvements urbains montréalais) (Montreal: Presses de l'Université de Montreal, 1991), 110–197Google Scholar.

44 Collin and Godbout, Les organismes populaires, 23–33.

45 Hamel, Action collective et démocratie, 110–97.

46 Lustiger-Thaler, Henri, ”New Social Movement Discourse: The Unsolved Democracy,” in Carroll, William K., ed., Organizing Dissent (published in Canada by Peter Saunders with the assistance of the Department of the Secretary of State, 1992), 188–189Google Scholar.

47 Kitschelt, The Logics of Party Formation, 118–19.

48 Napier, Joyce, ”Party Celebrates 15-year Rescue of Neighbourhood,” The Globe and Mail (Toronto), September 26, 1983, 10Google Scholar.

49 Wheeland, Peter, ”The MCM Splinter—The Alternate Parties,” in Roy, Jean-Hugues and Weston, Brendan, eds., Montreal: Citizen's Guide to Politics (Montreal: Black Rose Books, 1990), 190Google Scholar.

50 Peritz, Ingrid, ”MCM Caucus: Some Feeling Left Out,” The Gazette (Montreal), July 02, 1987, A3Google Scholar.

51 Bastien, Pierre, ”Resignations: MCM Councillors' Letters,” in Roy, and Weston, , eds., Montreal, 160–161Google Scholar.

52 Kitschelt, The Logics of Party Formation, 4.