Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Two Dogmas of the Artistic-Ethical Interaction Debate

  • Louise Hanson (a1)
  • Please note a correction has been issued for this article.

Abstract

Can artworks be morally good or bad? Many philosophers have thought so. Does this moral goodness or badness bear on how good or bad a work is as art? This is very much a live debate. Autonomists argue that moral value is not relevant to artistic value; interactionists argue that it is. In this paper, I argue that the debate between interactionists and autonomists has been conducted unfairly: all parties to the debate have tacitly accepted a set of constraints which prejudices the issue against the interactionist. I identify two demands which are routinely placed on arguments seeking to establish interaction and argue that they are, in fact, mutually conflicting.

There are two upshots. First, in light of this, it is unsurprising that arguments for interaction have failed to meet with everybody’s satisfaction. The constraints are such that no argument can meet them. Second, recognizing this helps us uncover a new, promising, but hitherto overlooked strategy for establishing artistic-ethical interaction.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Two Dogmas of the Artistic-Ethical Interaction Debate
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Two Dogmas of the Artistic-Ethical Interaction Debate
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Two Dogmas of the Artistic-Ethical Interaction Debate
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

References

Hide All
Anderson, James, and Dean, Jeffrey. 1998. “Moderate Autonomism.” British Journal of Aesthetics 38: 150–66.
Beardsley, Monroe. 1962. “Beauty and Aesthetic Value.” Journal of Philosophy 59 (21): 617–28.
Booth, Wayne. 1998. The Company We Keep. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Budd, Malcolm. 2002. The Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carroll, Noël. 1996. “Moderate Moralism.” British Journal of Aesthetics 36: 223–38.
Carroll, Noël. 1998a. “Moderate Moralism vs. Moderate AutonomismBritish Journal of Aesthetics 38: 419–24.
Carroll, Noël. 1998b. “Art, Narrative, and Moral Understanding.” In Aesthetics and Ethics: Essays at the Intersection, edited by Levinson, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 126–60.
Carroll, Noël. 2000. “Art and Ethical Criticism: An Overview of Recent Directions of Research.” Ethics 110 (2): 350–87.
Conolly, Oliver. 2000. “Ethicism and Moderate Moralism.” British Journal of Aesthetics 40 (3): 302–16.
Conolly, Oliver, and Haydar, Bashar. 2007. “Literature, Knowledge, and Value.” Philosophy and Literature 31 (1): 111–24.
Davies, David. 2007. Aesthetics and Literature. London: Continuum.
Devereaux, Mary. 1998. “Beauty and Evil: The Case of Leni Riefenstahl’s Triumph of the Will.” In Aesthetics and Ethics: Essays at the Intersection, edited Levinson, J., 227–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Devereaux, Mary. 2004. “Moral Judgements and Works of Art: The Case of Narrative Literature.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 62 (1): 311.
Dickie, George. 2005. “The Triumph in Triumph of the Will.” British Journal of Aesthetics 45 (2): 151–6.
Dodd, J. 2014. “On a Proposed Test for Artistic Value.” British Journal of Aesthetics 54 (4): 395407.
Eaton, Anne. 2012. “Robust Immoralism.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 70 (3): 289.
Eaton, Marcia. 2004. “Art and the Aesthetic.” In Blackwell Guide to Aesthetics, edited by Kivy, Peter, 6377. Oxford: Blackwell.
Ellmann, Richard. 1987. Oscar Wilde. London: Hamish Hamilton.
Gaut, Berys. 1998. “The Ethical Criticism of Art.” In Aesthetics and Ethics: Essays at the Intersection, edited by Levinson, Jerrold, 182203. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gaut, Berys. 2001. “Art and Ethics.” In The Routledge Handbook of Aesthetics, edited by Gaut, Berys and Lopes, Dominic, 431–44. Oxford: Routledge.
Gaut, Berys. 2007. Art, Emotion, and Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Giovannelli, Alessandro. 2007. “The Ethical Criticism of Art: A New Mapping of the Territory.” Philosophia 35 (2): 117–27.
Graham, Gordon. 2005. Philosophy of the Arts. Oxford: Routledge.
Hanson, Louise. 2013. “The Reality of Artistic Value.” The Philosophical Quarterly 63 (252): 492508.
Hanson, Louise. 2017. “Artistic Value is Attributive Goodness.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 75 (4): 415–27.
Harold, James. 2006. “On Judging the Moral Value of Narrative Artworks.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64 (2): 259–70.
Harold, James. 2008. “Immoralism and the Valence Constraint.” British Journal of Aesthetics 48 (1): 4564.
Harold, James. 2011. “Autonomism Reconsidered.” British Journal of Aesthetics 51 (2): 137–47.
Huddleston, A. 2012. “In Defense of Artistic ValuePhilosophical Quarterly 62 (249): 705–14.
Jacobson, Daniel. 1997. “In Praise of Immoral Art.” Philosophical Topics 25 (1): 155–99.
John, Eileen. 2003. “Artistic Value and Opportunistic Moralism.” In Contemporary Debates in Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art, edited by Kieran, Matthew, 332–41. Oxford: Routledge.
Kieran, Matthew. 1996. “Art, Imagination, and the Cultivation of Morals.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 54 (4): 337–51.
Kieran, Matthew. 2001. “In Defense of the Ethical Evaluation of Narrative Art.” British Journal of Aesthetics 41 (1): 2638.
Kieran, Matthew. 2002. “Forbidden Knowledge: The Challenge of Immoralism.” In Art and Morality, edited by Bermudez, Jose Luis and Gardner, Sebastian. London: Routledge.
Kieran, Matthew. 2005. Revealing Art. London: Routledge.
Kieran, Matthew. 2006. “Art, Morality, and Ethics.” Philosophy Compass 1 (2): 129–43.
Kieran, Matthew. 2009. “Cognitive Value of Art.” In A Companion to Aesthetics, edited by Davies, Stephen, Higgins, Kathleen Marie, Hopkins, Robert, et al., 194–96. Oxford: Blackwell.
Lopes, Dominic. 2005. Sight and Sensibility: Evaluating Pictures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lopes, Dominic. 2011. “The Myth of (Non-Aesthetic) Artistic Value.” The Philosophical Quarterly 61 (244): 518–36.
Nussbaum, Martha. 1990. “Finely Aware and Richly Responsible. In Love’s Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature, 148–67. New York: Oxford University Press.
Osborne, Harold. 1979. “The Concept of Creativity in Art.” British Journal of Aesthetics 19 (3): 224–31.
Posner, Richard. 1997. “Against Ethical Criticism.” Philosophy and Literature 21 (1): 127.
Smuts, Aaron. 2011. “Grounding Moralism: Moral Flaws and Aesthetic Properties.” Journal of Aesthetic Education 45(4): 3453.
Stecker, Robert. 2005. “The Interaction of Aesthetic and Ethical Value.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 45: 138–50.
Stecker, Robert. 2010. Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art: An Introduction. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Stecker, Robert. 2012. “Artistic Value Defended.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 70 (4): 355–62.
Vermazen, Bruce. 1991. “The Aesthetic Value of Originality.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 16 (1): 266–79.
Walton, Kendall. 1994. “Morals in Fiction and Fictional Morality.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 68 (supp. vol.): 2750.
Zangwill, Nick. 1998. “Aesthetic/Sensory Dependence.” British Journal of Aesthetics 38: 6681.

Keywords

Two Dogmas of the Artistic-Ethical Interaction Debate

  • Louise Hanson (a1)
  • Please note a correction has been issued for this article.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed

A correction has been issued for this article: