Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T12:37:19.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kant and the transparency of the mind

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Alexandra M. Newton Open the ORCID record for Alexandra M. Newton [Opens in a new window]
Alexandra M. Newton*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign-Urbana, IL, USA
*
Alexandra M. Newton amnewton@illinois.eduDepartment of Philosophy, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It has become standard to treat Kant'scharacterization of pure apperception as involving the claim that questions about what I think are transparent to questions about the world. By contrast, empirical apperception is thought to be non-transparent, since it involves a kind of inner observation of my mental states. I propose a reading that reverses this: pure apperception is non-transparent, because conscious only of itself, whereas empirical apperception is transparent to the world. The reading I offer, unlike the standard one, can accommodate Kant'sclaim that the I of pure apperception is the same as the I of empirical apperception.

Keywords

Self-consciousnesstransparencyapperceptionKantSartreEvans
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 49 , Issue 7 , November 2019 , pp. 890 - 915
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, H. 2004. Kant'sTranscendental Idealism. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle, 1984. “De Anima ” (DA). Translated by Smith, J. A.. In The Complete Works of Ar\istotle. 1 Vol. edited by Barnes, J.. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Boyle, M. 2009. “Two Kinds of Self-Knowledge.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 78 (1): 133–164. doi:10.1111/phpr.2008.78.issue-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, M. unpublished. “Transparency and Reflection”.Google Scholar
Byrne, A. 2011. “Transparency, Belief, and Intention.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 85 (1): 201–221. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8349.2011.00203.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, A. 2018. Transparency and Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engstrom, S. 2013. “Unity of Apperception.” Studi Kantiani, Fabrizio Serra Editore, 26:37–54.Google Scholar
Engstrom, S. 2017. “Knowledge and Its Object.” In Kant'sCritique of Pure Reason: A Critical Guide, edited by O’Shea, J., 28–45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, G. 1982. Varieties of Reference. Edited by J. McDowell. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. 1998. “On the Essence of Truth.” In Pathmarks, edited by McNeill, W., 136–154. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornsby, J. 1997. “Truth: The Identity Theory.” In: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 97: 1–24, Aristotelian Society was held at Birkbeck College, London.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1992. Jäsche Logic (JL). In: Lectures on Logic. Translated and edited by J. M., Young. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason (KrV). Translated and edited by Guyer, Paul and Wood, Allen W. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, P. 2011. Kant'sThinker. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, C. M. 2009. Self-Constitution. Agency, Identity, Integrity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longuenesse, B. 1998. Kant and the Capacity to Judge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longuenesse, B. 2017. I, Me, Mine. Back to Kant, and Back Again. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, J. 1994. Mind and World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Moran, R. 2001. Authority and Estrangement. An Essay on Self-Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Moran, R. 2012. “Self-Knowledge, ‘Transparency’, and the Forms of Activity.” In Introspection and Consciousness, edited by Smithies, D. and Stoljar, D., 211–238. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narboux, J.-P. unpublished. “Is Self-Consciousness Consciousness of One'sSelf?”Google Scholar
Rödl, S. 2007. Self-Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rödl, S. 2017. “The First Person and Self-Knowledge in Analytic Philosophy.” In Self-Knowledge. A History, edited by Renz, U.. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 280–294.Google Scholar
Rödl, S. 2018. Self-Consciousness and Objectivity. An Introduction to Absolute Idealism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sartre, J.-P. 1956. Being and Nothingness (BN). Translated by Barnes, H. E.. Gallimard. New York: Washington Square Press.Google Scholar
Sartre, J.-P. 1960. The Transcendence of the Ego. An Existentialist Theory of Consciousness (TE). Translated by Williams, F. and Kirkpatrick, R.. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Sartre, J.-P. 1970. “Intentionality: A Fundamental Idea of Husserl'sPhenomenology.” Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 1 (2): 4–5. doi:10.1080/00071773.1970.11006118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, P. 1966. The Bounds of Sense. An Essay on Kant'sCritique of Pure Reason. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tolley, C. 2011. “Kant on the Content of Cognition.” European Journal of Philosophy 22 (2): 200–228. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0378.2011.00483.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valaris, M. 2008. “Inner Sense, Self-Affection, and Temporal Consciousness in Kant'sCritique of Pure Reason.” Philosophers’ Imprint 8 (4 ): 1–18.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1958. Blue and Brown Books. New York: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 2001. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (Tractatus). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar