Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Aiding self-knowledge

  • Casey Doyle (a1)

Abstract

Some self-knowledge must be arrived at by the subject herself, rather than being transmitted by another’s testimony. Yet in many cases the subject interacts with an expert in part because she is likely to have the relevant knowledge of their mind. This raises a question: what is the expert’s knowledge like that there are barriers to simply transmitting it by testimony? I argue that the expert’s knowledge is, in some circumstances, proleptic, referring to attitudes the subject would hold were she to reflect in certain ways. The expert’s knowledge cannot be transmitted by testimony because self-knowledge cannot be proleptic.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Aiding self-knowledge
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Aiding self-knowledge
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Aiding self-knowledge
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

Casey Doyle casey.doyle@st-hildas.ox.ac.ukSt Hilda’s College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

References

Hide All
Bakhurst, D. 2011. The Formation of Reason. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
Boyle, M. 2009. “Active Belief.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 39 (1 ): 119147. doi:10.1080/00455091.2009.10717646.
Boyle, M. 2011. “Transparent Self-Knowledge.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 85 (1 ): 223241. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8349.2011.00204.x.
Burge, T. 1996. “Our Entitlement to Self-Knowledge.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 96 (1 ): 91116. doi:10.1093/aristotelian/96.1.91.
Callard, A. 2018. Aspiration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Doyle, C. forthcoming. “Deferring to Others about One’s Own Mind.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly.
Fernandez, J. 2013. Transparent Minds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Finkelstein, D. 1999. “On the Distinction between Conscious and Unconscious States of Mind.” American Philosophical Quarterly 36 (2 ): 79100.
Freud, S. 1966. Introductory Lectures on Psycho-Analysis. New York: W.W. Norton.
Gallois, A. 1999. The World without, the Mind within. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Harcourt, E. 2017. “Containment and ‘Rational Health’: Moran and Psychoanalysis.” European Journal of Philosophy. doi:10.1111/ejop.12316.
Hieronymi, P. 2009. “Two Kinds of Agency.” In Mental Actions, edited by O’Brien, L. and Soteriou, M., 138162. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hills, A. 2013. “Moral Testimony.” Philosophy Compass 8 (6 ): 552559. doi:10.1111/phc3.12040.
Hopkins, R. 2007. “What Is Wrong with Moral Testimony?Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74: 611634. doi:10.1111/phpr.2007.74.issue-3.
Howell, R. 2014. “Google Morals, Virtue, and the Asymmetry of Deference.” Nous 48 (3 ): 389415. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0068.2012.00873.x.
Lear, J. 2004. Freud. London: Routledge.
Little, M. 2008. “Abortion and the Margins of Personhood.” Rutgers Law Journal 9: 331348.
McGinn, C. 1997. The Character of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Moran, R. 2001. Authority and Estrangement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
O’Shaughnessy, B. 2000. Consciousness and the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Peacocke, C. 1998. Conscious attitudes, attention, and self-knowledge. InKnowing Our Own Minds, edited by Wright, C., Smith, B. and MacDonald, C., 6397. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shoemaker, S. 1968. “Self-Reference and Self-Awareness.” Journal of Philosophy 65 (19 ): 555567. doi:10.2307/2024121.
Williams, B. 1972. Morality: An Introduction to Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Williams, B. 1981. “Internal Reasons, ” in his Moral Luck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Williams, B. 1989. “Internal Reasons and the Obscurity of Blame.” in his Making Sense of Humanity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Williams, B. 2008. “The Human Prejudice.” in his Philosophy as a Humanistic Discipline. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Keywords

Aiding self-knowledge

  • Casey Doyle (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed