Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-2h6rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-26T11:43:04.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

When to think like an epistemicist

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Matthew Mosdell
Matthew Mosdell*
Affiliation:
University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
*
*Email: mosmium@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Epistemicism is the view that seemingly vague predicates are not in fact vague. Consequently, there must be a sharp boundary between a man who is bald and one who is not bald. Although such a view is often met with incredulity, my aim is to provide a defense of epistemicism in this essay. My defense, however, is backhanded: I argue that the formal commitments of epistemicism are the result of good practical reasoning, not metaphysical necessity. To get to that conclusion, I spend most of the essay arguing that using a formal system like classical logic to manage seemingly vague situations requires practical principles to mediate between the formalism and what it aims to represent.

Keywords

Vaguenessepistemicismsorites paradoxpractical reason
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 45 , Issue 4 , August 2015 , pp. 538 - 559
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akerman, Jonas. 2012. “Contextualist Theories of Vagueness.”; Philosophy Compass 7: 470–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beall, J. C. ed. 2003. Liars and Heaps. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bueno, Otavio, and Colyvan, Mark. 2012. “Just What Is Vagueness.”; Ratio XXV :19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy. 1983. How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Harry, and Evans, Robert. 2008. “You Cannot be Serious! Public Understanding of Technology with Special Reference to ‘Hawk-Eye’.”; Public Understanding of Science 17: 283–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Roy. 2002. “Vagueness and Mathematical Precision.”; Mind 111: 227–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietz, Richard, and Moruzzi, Sebastiano, eds. 2010. Cuts and Clouds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dummett, Michael. 1997. “Wang’s Paradox.”; In Vagueness: A Reader, edited by Keefe, Rosanna and Smith, Peter, 99–118. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Edgington, Dorothy. 1997. “Vagueness by Degrees.”; In Vagueness: A Reader, edited by Keefe, Rosanna and Smith, Peter, 294–326. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Eklund, Matti. 2011. “Recent Work on Vagueness.”; Analysis 71: 352–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Gareth. 1978. “Can There Be Vague Objects.”; Analysis 38: 208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fara, Delia Graff. 2003. “Gap Principles, Penumbral Connection, and Infinitely Higher-Order Vagueness.”; In Liars and Heaps, edited by Beall, J. C., 195–221. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Originally published under the name “Delia Graff”;).Google Scholar
Fine, Kit. 1997. “Vagueness, Truth and Logic.”; In Vagueness: A Reader, edited by Keefe, Rosanna and Smith, Peter, 119–150. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fischetti, Mark. 2007. “In or Out.”; Scientific American 297: 96–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haber, Matt. 2009. “Phylogenetic Inference.”; In A Companion to the Philosophy of History and Historiography, edited by Tucker, Aviezer, 231–242. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyde, Dominic. 1997. “From Heaps and Gaps to Heaps of Gluts.”; Mind 106: 641–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keefe, Rosanna. 2000. Theories of Vagueness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keefe, Rosanna, and Smith, Peter. 1997. Vagueness: A Reader. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
van Kerkhove, Bart. 2003. “Vagueness Unlimited. In Defence of a Pragmatical Approach to Sorites Paradoxes.”; Logic and Logical Philosophy 11: 251–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laporte, Joseph. 2005. “Is There a Single Objective, Evolutionary Tree of Life?”; The Journal of Philosophy 102: 357–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David. 1988. “Vague Identity: Evans Misunderstood.”; Analysis 48: 128–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machina, Kenton. 1999. “Truth, Belief, and Vagueness.”; In Vagueness: A Reader, edited by Keefe, Rosanna and Smith, Peter, 174–203. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mayr, Ernst. 2000. “The Biological Species Concept.”; In Species Concepts and Phylogenetic Theory, edited by Wheeler, Quentin and Meier, Rudolf, 17–29. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Millgram, Elijah. 2009. Hard Truths. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridley, Mark. 2004. Evolution. 3rd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sainani, Kristin. 2009. “Evolution and HIV”;. In Biomedical Computation Review, 20–31. Palo Alto: Simbios.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Stewart. 2008. Vagueness in Context. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Stewart. 2009. “Classical Logic.”; The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2009/entries/logic-classical/.Google Scholar
Soames, Scott. 1999. Understanding Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soames, Scott. 2010. What is Meaning?. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorensen, Roy. 1988. Blindspots. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Sorensen, Roy A. 2001. Vagueness and Contradiction. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Sterelny, Kim, and Griffiths, Paul. 1999. Sex and Death. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, Peter. 1962. “Freedom and Resentment.”; Proceedings of the British Academy 48: 1–25.Google Scholar
Tye, Michael. 1997. “Sorites Paradoxes and the Semantics of Vagueness.”; In Vagueness: A Reader, edited by Keefe, Rosanna and Smith, Peter, 281–293. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Velasco, Joel D. 2010. “Species, Genes and the Tree of Life.”; British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61: 599–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, Quentin, and Meier, Rudolf. 2000. Species Concepts and Phylogenetic Theory. New York: Columbia.Google Scholar
Williamson, Timothy. 1994. Vagueness. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Williamson, Timothy. 2003. “Vagueness in Reality.”; In The Oxford Handbook of Metphysics, edited by Loux, Michael and Zimmerman, Dean, 690–716. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Mark. 2006. Wandering Significance. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Crispin. 1975. “On the Coherence of Vague Predicates.”; Synthese 30: 325–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Crispin. 1976. “Language Mastery and the Sorites Paradox.”; In Truth and Meaning: Essays in Semantics, edited by Evans, Gareth and McDowell, John, 223–247. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar