No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Keeping track of what's right
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2020
Abstract
In this paper, we argue that ordinary judgments about core normative topics purport to attribute stable, objective properties and relations. Our strategy is first to analyze the structures and practices characteristic of paradigmatically representational concepts such as concepts of objects and natural kinds. We identify three broad features that ground the representational purport of these concepts. We then argue that core normative concepts exhibit these same features.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 48 , Issue 3-4: Special issue: Representation and Evaluation , 2018 , pp. 489 - 509
- Copyright
- Copyright © Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2018