Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T21:09:25.450Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Regional Variability in the Use of CT for Patients with Suspected Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2014

Won Hyung A. Ryu ,
Anthony Feinstein ,
Angela Colantonio ,
David L. Streiner  and
Deirdre Dawson
Won Hyung A. Ryu
Affiliation:
Kunin-Lunenfeld Applied Research Unit, Baycrest Graduate Department of Rehabilitation Science, University of Toronto Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Anthony Feinstein
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Angela Colantonio
Affiliation:
Kunin-Lunenfeld Applied Research Unit, Baycrest Graduate Department of Rehabilitation Science, University of Toronto Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
David L. Streiner
Affiliation:
Kunin-Lunenfeld Applied Research Unit, Baycrest Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto
Deirdre Dawson*
Affiliation:
Kunin-Lunenfeld Applied Research Unit, Baycrest Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto Graduate Department of Rehabilitation Science, University of Toronto Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
*
Kunin-Lunenfeld Applied Research Unit, Baycrest, 3560 Bathurst St., Toronto, Ontario, M6A 2E1, Canada.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

To investigate the use of computed tomography (CT) scans in patients with suspected acute mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) presenting to emergency departments.

Method:

850 potential mTBI cases were identified through reviews of three months of health records from nine selected emergency departments across the province of Ontario. Records for review were selected using the International Classification of Disease, 9th revision, Clinical Modification codes and Injury codes.

Results:

Patients who received head CT were significantly older (p<0.01), had documented loss-of-consciousness (LOC) &/or Post-TraumaticAmnesia (PTA) (p<0.001), documented nausea (p<0.01), documented vomiting (p<0.001), abnormal neurological exam results (p<0.01), had visited an urban center (p<0.001), and/or arrived by ambulance (p<0.001). The significant predictors of CT scan prescription (in a forward stepwise logistic regression) were urban location of hospital (OR=5.14; p≤0.001), LOC &/or PTA (OR=4.83; p≤0.001), vomiting (OR=2.56; p≤0.01), arrival by ambulance (OR=2.15; p≤0.001), nausea (OR=1.92; p=≤0.02) and older age (OR=1.02; p≤0.01).

Conclusion:

These data extend our knowledge regarding the use of CT during acute diagnosis and management of suspected mTBI patients. In addition to confirming previously reported risk factors of intracranial complication, geographical location of hospital and arrival mode were found to be significant predictors of CT use. The results suggest that the management patterns for acute mTBI are inconsistent. The implications of this are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , January 2009 , pp. 42 - 46
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Journal of Neurological 2009

References

1.Stiell, IG, Wells, GA, Vandemheen, K, Clement, C, Lesiuk, H, Laupacis, A, et al.The Canadian CT head rule for patients with minor head injury. Lancet. 2001 May 5;357(9266):1391–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Haydel, MJ, Preston, CA, Mills, TJ, Luber, S, Blaudeau, E, DeBlieux, PM.Indications for computed tomography in patients with minor head injury. N Engl J Med. 2000 Jul 13;343(2):100–5.Google Scholar
3.Stiell, IG, Wells, GA, Vandemheen, K, Laupacis, A, Brison, R, Eisenhauer, MA, et al.Variation in ED use of computed tomography for patients with minor head injury. Ann Emerg Med. 1997 Jul;30(1):14–22.Google Scholar
4.Patterns of Health Care in Ontario. 2nd ed. Goel V, Canadian Medical Association, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences in Ontario, editors. Ottawa: Published by the Canadian Medical Association [for] the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences in Ontario; 1996.Google Scholar
5.Small-area variations: What are they and what do they mean? Health services research group. CMAJ. 1992 Feb 15;146(4):467–70.Google Scholar
6.Iscoe, NA, Goel, V, Wu, K, Fehringer, G, Holowaty, EJ, Naylor, CD.Variation in breast cancer surgery in Ontario. CMAJ. 1994 Feb 1;150(3):345–52.Google Scholar
7. 2006 census [homepage on the Internet]. Available from: http://www12.statcan.ca/Google Scholar
8.Ontario Hospital Association regions [homepage on the Internet]. Available from: http://www.oha.com/Google Scholar
9.Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Committee of the Head Injury Interdisciplinary Special Interest Group of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Definition of mild traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1993 September;8(3):86–7.Google Scholar
10.Vos, PE, Battistin, L, Birbamer, G, Gerstenbrand, F, Potapov, A, Prevec, T, et al.EFNS guideline on mild traumatic brain injury: report of an EFNS task force. Eur J Neurol. 2002 May;9(3):207–19.Google Scholar
11.Borg, J, Holm, L, Cassidy, JD, Peloso, PM, Carroll, LJ, von Holst, H, et al.Diagnostic procedures in mild traumatic brain injury: results of the WHO collaborating centre task force on mild traumatic brain injury. J Rehabil Med. 2004 Feb 43 Suppl: 61–75.Google Scholar
12.Norman, GR.Biostatistics: the bare essentials. 2nd ed. Streiner, DL, editor. Hamilton: B.C. Decker; 2000.Google Scholar
13.Wennberg, JE.Dealing with medical practice variations: a proposal for action. Health Aff (Millwood). 1984;3(2):6–32.Google Scholar
14.Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV-TR. 4th ed, text revision. American Psychiatric Association and American Psychiatric Association, editors. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.Google Scholar
15.Practice parameter: the management of concussion in sports. Report of the quality standards subcommittee. Neurology. 1997 Mar;48(3):581–5.Google Scholar
16.Alexander, MP.Mild traumatic brain injury: pathophysiology, natural history, and clinical management. Neurology. 1995 Jul;45(7):1253–60.Google Scholar
17.Nell, V, Yates, DW, Kruger, J.An extended Glasgow coma scale (GCS-E) with enhanced sensitivity to mild brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 May;81(5):614–7.Google Scholar
18.Rees, PM.Contemporary issues in mild traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(12): 1885–94.Google Scholar
19.Tate, RL, McDonald, S, Lulham, JM.Incidence of hospital-treated traumatic brain injury in an Australian community. Aust NZJ Pub Health. 1998 Jun;22(4):419–23.Google Scholar
20.Hebb, MO, Clarke, DB, Tallon, JM.Development of a provincial guideline for the acute assessment and management of adult and pediatric patients with head injuries. Can J Surg. 2007 Jun;50(3):187–94.Google ScholarPubMed