Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T02:17:49.564Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mild Non-lesional Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: A Common, Unrecognized Disorder with Onset in Adulthood

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

Umberto Aguglia ,
Antonio Gambardella ,
Emilio Le Plane ,
Demetrio Messina ,
Rosario L. Oliveri ,
Concetta Russo ,
Mario Zappia  and
Aldo Quattrone
Umberto Aguglia*
Affiliation:
Institute of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of Catanzaro, Italy
Antonio Gambardella
Affiliation:
Institute of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of Catanzaro, Italy Insitute of Experimental Medicine and Biotechnology, National Research Council, Mangone, Casenza, Italy.
Emilio Le Plane
Affiliation:
Institute of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of Catanzaro, Italy
Demetrio Messina
Affiliation:
Institute of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of Catanzaro, Italy
Rosario L. Oliveri
Affiliation:
Institute of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of Catanzaro, Italy Insitute of Experimental Medicine and Biotechnology, National Research Council, Mangone, Casenza, Italy.
Concetta Russo
Affiliation:
Institute of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of Catanzaro, Italy
Mario Zappia
Affiliation:
Institute of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of Catanzaro, Italy
Aldo Quattrone
Affiliation:
Institute of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of Catanzaro, Italy Insitute of Experimental Medicine and Biotechnology, National Research Council, Mangone, Casenza, Italy.
*
Università degli Studi, Clinica Neurologica, Policlinico Materdomini, Via T. Campanella, 88100 Catanzaro (Italy)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

To compare mild vs. severe non-lesional temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE).

Methods:

Data from 104 consecutive patients with non-lesional TLE were reviewed. Seventy-three of the 104 fulfilled the criteria for inclusion in this study of a follow-up period longer than three years at our Institute. Patients were considered to have a mild TLE if they were seizure free for at least three years after appropriate antiepileptic medication, or had rare (≤ 2/year) complex partial or secondarily generalized seizures for at least three years with or without appropriate antiepileptic therapy. Clinical, EEG and MRI data of mild vs. severe non-lesional TLE patients were compared on the basis of a cross-sectional study design.

Results:

Of the 73 patients with non-lesional TLE included in the study, 43 (59%) had mild TLE, and 30 (41%) had severe TLE. Duration of epilepsy was significantly shorter (mean 15.2 ± 10.5 years vs. 26.4 ± 13.2 years) and age at onset was significantly higher (mean 34.3 ± 15.3 years vs. 7.8 ± 6.8 years) in mild than in severe TLE group. Patients with mild TLE had also a significantly higher prevalence of positive family history of epilepsy (37.2% vs. 10%), and a significantly lower occurrence rate of febrile convulsions (FC) (4.7% vs. 33.3%), mesial temporal sclerosis (MTS) (6.9% vs. 36.7%), and intelligence deficiency (0% vs. 20%). In mild TLE there was also a significantly high rate (58.1% vs. 0%) of delayed diagnosis (from 1 to 28 years), because of misdiagnosis (39.5%) or no medical counseling (18.6%).

Conclusions:

Mild non-lesional TLE is a common, unrecognized disorder mainly characterized by both onset in adulthood and high prevalence of familial history of epilepsy. The present findings suggest that mild non-lesional TLE may represent a clinical entity different from severe non-lesional TLE.

Résumé:

RÉSUMÉ:But:

Comparer l'épilepsie temporale (ÉT) légère et sévère, sans lésion du lobe temporal.

Méthodes:

Nous avons révisé les dossiers de 104 patients consécutifs atteints d'ÉT sans lésion. Soixante-treize des 104 remplissaient le critère d'inclu¬sion de cette étude, soit un suivi de plus de trois ans à notre Institut. Les patients étaient considérés comme souffrant d'ÉT légère s'ils n'avaient pas eu de crise depuis au moins 3 ans sous médication antiépileptique appropriée ou avaient eu très peu de crises partielles complexes ou secondairement généralisées (≤ 2/année) pendant au moins 3 ans, avec ou sans traitement antiépileptique approprié. Nous avons comparé les données cliniques, électroencéphalo-graphiques et de RMN des patients avec ÉT légère et sévère, sans lésion, selon un plan d'étude transversale

Résultats:

Parmi les 73 patients inclus dans l'étude, 43 (59%) avaient une ET légère et 30 (41%) avaient une ÉT sévère. La durée de la maladie était significativement plus courte (moyenne 15.2 ± 10.5 ans vs. 26.4 ± 13.2 ans) et l'âge de début était significativement plus élevé (moyenne 34.3 ± 15.3 ans vs. 7.8 ± 6.8 ans) dans les cas d'ÉT légère par rapport aux cas sévères. Les patients atteints d'ÉT légère avaient également une prévalence significativement plus élevée d'une histoire familiale d'épilepsie (37.2% vs. 10%) et une fréquence plus élevée de convulsions fébriles (4.7% vs. 33.3%), de sclérose temporale mésiale (6.9% vs. 36.7%) et de déficit intellectuel (0% vs. 20%). Dans l'ÉT légère, il y avait également un taux significativement élevé de diagnostic tardif (58.1% vs. 0%, de 1 à 28 ans), à cause de diagnostics erronés (39.5%) ou d'absence de consultation médicale (18.6%).

Conclusions:

L'ÉT légère sans lésion est une affec¬tion fréquente, méconnue, caractérisée principalement par un début à l'âge adulte et une prévalence élevée d'une his¬toire familiale d'épilepsie. Nos constatations suggèrent que l'ÉT légère sans lésion pourrait représenter une entité clinique différente de l'ÉT sévère sans lésion.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 25 , Issue 4 , November 1998 , pp. 282 - 286
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation 1998

References

REFERENCES

1. Loiseau, P, Duche, B, Loiseau, J. Classification of epilepsies and epileptic syndromes in two different samples of patients. Epilepsia 1991; 32: 303–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Manford, M, Hart, YM, Sander, JWAS, Shorvon, SD. National General Practice Study of Epilepsy: partial seizure patterns in a general population. Neurology 1992; 42: 1911–1917.Google Scholar
3. Jack, CR, Mullan, BP, Sharbrough, F., et al. Intractable non-lesional epilepsy of temporal lobe origin: lateralization by interictal SPECT versus MRI Neurology 1994; 44: 829–836.Google Scholar
4. Hauser, WA, The natural history of temporal lobe epilepsy. In: Liiders, HO ed. Epilepsy Surgery. New York: Raven Press, 1992: 133–141.Google Scholar
5. French, JA., Williamson, PD, Thadani, VM, et al. Characteristics of medial temporal lobe epilepsy: I. Results of history and physical examination. Ann Neurol 1993; 34: 774–780.Google Scholar
6. Jackson, GD., Berkovic, SF, Tress, BM, et al. Hippocampal sclerosis can be reliably detected by magnetic resonance imaging. Neurology 1990; 40: 1869–1875.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Berkovic, SF, Andermann, F, Olivier, A, et al. Hippocampal sclerosis in temporal lobe epilepsy demonstrated by magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol 1991; 29: 175–182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Williamson, PD, French, JA, Thadani, VM, et al. Characteristics of medial temporal lobe epilepsy: II. Interictal and ictal scalp electroencephalography, neuropsychological testing, neuroimaging, surgical results, and pathology. Ann Neurol 1993; 34: 780–787.Google Scholar
9. Bruton, CJ. The neuropathology of temporal lobe epilepsy. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
10. Berkovic, SF, Howell, RA, Hopper, JL. Familial temporal lobe epilepsy: a new syndrome with adolescent/adult onset and a benign course. In: Wolf, P, ed. Epileptic Seizures and Syndromes. London: John Libbey & Company Ltd., 1994: 257–263.Google Scholar
11. Commission on classification and terminology of the International League Against Epilepsy. Proposal for classification of epilepsy and epileptic syndromes. Epilepsia 1989; 30: 389–399.Google Scholar
12. Gloor, P, Olivier, P, Quesney, LF, Andermann, F, Horowitz, S. The role of the limbic system in experiential phenomena of temporal lobe epilepsy. Ann Neurol 1982; 12: 129–144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Palmini, A, Gloor, P. The localizing value of auras in partial seizures: a prospective and retrospective study. Neurology 1992; 42: 801–808.Google Scholar
14. Cendes, F, Andermann, F, Gloor, P, et al. Relationship between atrophy of the amygdala and ictal fear in temporal lobe epilepsy. Brain 1994; 117: 739–746.Google Scholar
15. Kotagal, P, Luders, HO, Williams, G, Nichols, TR, Mcpherson, J. Psychomotor seizures of temporal lobe onset: analysis of symptom clusters and sequences. Epilepsy Res, 1995; 20: 49–67.Google Scholar
16. Manford, M, Fish, DR, Shorvon, SD. An analysis of clinical seizure patterns and their localizing value in frontal and temporal lobe epilepsies. Brain 1996; 119: 17–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Gil-Nagel, A, Risinger, MW. Ictal semiology in hippocampal versus extrahippocampal temporal lobe epilepsy. Brain 1997; 120: 183–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Aguglia, U, Gambardella, A, Le Piane, E, et al. Chlorpromazine versus sleep deprivation in activation of EEG in adult-onset partial epilepsy. J Neurol 1994; 241: 605–610.Google Scholar
19. Gambardella, A, Aguglia, U, Le Piane, E, et al. Autosomal dominant temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia 1996; 37 (Suppl 5): 115.Google Scholar
20. Gloor, P. Mesial temporal sclerosis: historical background and an overview from a modern perspective. In: Luders, H, ed. Epilepsy Surgery. New York: Raven Press, 1991: 689–703.Google Scholar
21. Shorvon, SD, Sander, JWAS. Temporal patterns of remission and relapse of seizures in patients with epilepsy. In: Schmidt, D, Morselli, PL, eds. Intractable Epilepsy. New York: Raven Press, 1986: 13–23.Google Scholar
22. Cockerell, OC, Johnson, AL, Sander, JWA, Shorvon, SD. Prognosis of epilepsy: a review and further analysis of the first nine years of the British National General Practice Study of Epilepsy, a prospective population-based study. Epilepsia 1997; 38: 31–46.Google Scholar
23. Gambardella, A, Gotman, J, Cendes, F, Andermann, F. The relation of spike foci and of clinical seizure characteristics to different patterns of mesial temporal atrophy. Arch Neurol 1995; 52: 287–293.Google Scholar
24. Berkovic, S, Mcintosh, A, Howell, RA, et al. Familial temporal lobe epilepsy: a common disorder identified in twins. Ann Neurol 1996; 40: 227–235.Google Scholar
25. Franceschi, M, Triulzi, F, Ferini-Strambi, L, et al. Focal cerebral lesions found in magnetic resonance imaging in cryptogenic nonrefractory temporal lobe epilepsy patients. Epilepsia 1989; 30: 540–546.Google Scholar
26. Cendes, F, Andermann, F, Gloor, P, et al. MRI volumetric measurements of amygdala and hippocampus in temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurology 1993; 43: 719–725.Google Scholar
27. Van Paesschen, W, Connelly, A, Johnson, C, Duncan, J. The amygdala and intractable temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurology 1996; 47: 1021–1031.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28. Kuzniecky, R, Elgavish, GA, Hetherington, HP, Evanochko, WT, Pohost, GM. In vivo 31P nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of human temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurology 1992; 42: 2011–2018.Google Scholar
29. Forsgren, L. Prospective incidence study and clinical characterization of seizures in newly referred adults. Epilepsia 1990; 31: 292–301.Google Scholar
30. Tisher, PW, Holzer, JC, Greenberg, M et al. Psychiatric presentation of epilepsy. Harvard Rev Psychiatry 1993; 1: 219–228.Google Scholar
31. Weilburb, JB, Schachter, S, Worth, J, et al. EEG abnormalities in patients with atypical panic attacks. J Clin Psychiatry 1995; 56: 358–362.Google Scholar