Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T12:21:45.763Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluating an Organized Palliative Care Approach in Patients with Severe Stroke

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2014

Dylan P. V. Blacquiere ,
Gord J. Gubitz ,
David Dupere ,
Deborah McLeod  and
Stephen Phillips
Dylan P. V. Blacquiere*
Affiliation:
Division of Neurology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario
Gord J. Gubitz
Affiliation:
Division of Neurology, QEII Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
David Dupere
Affiliation:
Division of Palliative Care, QEII Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Deborah McLeod
Affiliation:
Cancer Care Program, QEII Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Stephen Phillips
Affiliation:
Division of Neurology, QEII Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
*
Division of Neurology, The Ottawa Hospital, 1170 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4E9, Canada.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background:

A recent survey found few guidelines on the provision of palliative care following stroke; none examined the efficacy or results of any such process. The role of the patient's family in decision making and in conflicts with staff has not been evaluated. We sought to formally evaluate the use of locally-developed palliative care guidelines on our Acute Stroke Unit (ASU).

Methods:

We retrospectively examined records of 104 patients who died on our ASU over a two-year period to determine if our existing palliative guidelines were reflected in clinical practice, and to identify conflicts that arose. Data on medical and nursing care, palliative decisions, and medication use were compared to the ASU's existing palliative care guidelines. Family concerns about the palliative process were also reviewed.

Results:

Of patients admitted to the stroke unit, 104 (16% of total admissions) died. Ninety-four (90.4%) of these were palliated; all received routine nursing and comfort care prior to death. Median time from admission to palliation was 3.6 days; median time from admission to death was 8.5 days. Most had vital signs (98.9%), investigations (100%) and non-palliative medications (95.7%) stopped, and had nasogastric feeding (96.8%) and intravenous fluids (87.2%) withdrawn or never begun. Most were treated with morphine (93.6%) and scopolamine (81.9%). Concerns raised by family members centered around hydration and feeding (45.7%), doubts about palliative care (27.8%) and patient comfort (18.2%).

Conclusions:

A formal approach to palliation results in timely decisions regarding end of life care with relatively few conflicts. Further work to address the specific concerns of families is needed.

Type
Other
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 36 , Issue 6 , November 2009 , pp. 731 - 734
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Journal of Neurological 2009

References

1.Rogers, A, Addington-Hall, J.Care of the dying stroke patient in the acute setting. J Res Nurs. 2005 Mar;10(2):153–67.Google Scholar
2.Alexandrov, AV, Bladin, CF, Meslin, EM, Norris, JW.Do-not-resuscitate orders in stroke. Neurology. 1995 Apr;45(4):634–40.Google Scholar
3.Wijdicks, EFM, Rabinstein, AA.Absolutely no hope? Some ambiguity of futility of care in devastating acute stroke. Crit Care Med. 2004 Nov;32(11):2332–42.Google Scholar
4.Rogers, A.The interface between acute and palliative care: acute stroke. EJPC. 2003; 10(6):236–8.Google Scholar
5.Ferris, FD, Balfour, HM, Bowen, K, Farley, J, Hardwick, M, Lamontagne, C, et al.A model to guide patient and family care: based on nationally accepted principles and norms of practice. J Pain Symptom Manage 2002; 24(2):106–23.Google Scholar
6.Addington-Hall, J, Lay, M, Altmann, D, McCarthy, M.Symptom control, communication with health professionals, and hospital care of stroke patients in the last year of life as reported by surviving family, friends, and officials. Stroke. 1995 Dec;26(12): 2242–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Asplund, K, Britton, M.Ethics of life support in patients with severe stroke. Stroke. 1989 Aug;20(8):1107–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Blackmer, J.Tube feeding in stroke patients: amedical and ethical perspective. Can J Neurol Sci. 2001 May;28(2):101–6.Google Scholar
9.Louw, SJ, Keeble, JA.Stroke medicine-ethical and legal considerations. Age Ageing. 2002 Nov;31 Suppl 3:31–5.Google Scholar
10.Printz, LA.Terminal dehydration, a compassionate treatment. Arch Intern Med. 1992 Apr;152(4):697–700.Google Scholar
11.McCann, RM, Hall, WJ, Groth-Juncker, A.Comfort care for terminally ill patients: the appropriate use of nutrition and hydration. JAMA. 1994 Oct 26;272(16):1263–6.Google Scholar
12.The EC/IC Bypass Study Group. The international cooperative study of extracranial/intracranial arterial anastomosis (EC/IC bypass study): methodology and entry characteristics. Stroke. 1985 May-June;16(3):397–406.Google Scholar