Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T16:55:23.482Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Local Convergence and Stability of Tight Bridge-addable Classes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2018

G. Chapuy
Affiliation:
IRIF, UMR CNRS 8243, Université Paris-Diderot, France Email: guillaume.chapuy@irif.fr
G. Perarnau
Affiliation:
IRIF, UMR CNRS 8243, Université Paris-Diderot, France Email: guillaume.chapuy@irif.fr

Abstract

A class of graphs is bridge-addable if given a graph $G$ in the class, any graph obtained by adding an edge between two connected components of $G$ is also in the class. The authors recently proved a conjecture of McDiarmid, Steger, and Welsh stating that if ${\mathcal{G}}$ is bridge-addable and $G_{n}$ is a uniform $n$-vertex graph from ${\mathcal{G}}$, then $G_{n}$ is connected with probability at least $(1+o_{n}(1))e^{-1/2}$. The constant $e^{-1/2}$ is best possible, since it is reached for the class of all forests.

In this paper, we prove a form of uniqueness in this statement: if ${\mathcal{G}}$ is a bridge-addable class and the random graph $G_{n}$ is connected with probability close to $e^{-1/2}$, then $G_{n}$ is asymptotically close to a uniform $n$-vertex random forest in a local sense. For example, if the probability converges to $e^{-1/2}$, then $G_{n}$ converges in the sense of Benjamini–Schramm to the uniformly infinite random forest $F_{\infty }$. This result is reminiscent of so-called “stability results” in extremal graph theory, the difference being that here the stable extremum is not a graph but a graph class.

Type
Article
Copyright
© Canadian Mathematical Society 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Supported by the European Research Council, grant ERC-2016-STG 716083 “CombiTop”.

References

Addario-Berry, L., McDiarmid, C., and Reed, B., Connectivity for bridge-addable monotone graph classes. Combin. Probab. Comput. 21(2012), 803815. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963548312000272.Google Scholar
Aldous, D., The continuum random tree. III. Ann. Probab. 23(1993), 248289.Google Scholar
Aldous, D., Tree-valued Markov chains and Poisson-Galton-Watson distributions. In: Microsurveys in discrete probability (Princeton, NJ, 1997). DIMACS Ser. Discrete Math. Theoret. Comput. Sci., 41, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 199, pp. 120.Google Scholar
Balister, P., Bollobás, B., and Gerke, S., Connectivity of addable graph classes. J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 98(2008), 577584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jctb.2007.09.003.Google Scholar
Bergeron, F., Labelle, G., and Leroux, P., Combinatorial species and tree-like structures. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, 67, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998.Google Scholar
Benjamini, I. and Schramm, O., Recurrence of distributional limits of finite planar graphs. Electron. J. Probab. 6(2001), no. 23.Google Scholar
Chapuy, G. and Perarnau, G., Connectivity in bridge-addable graph classes: the McDiarmid-Steger-Welsh conjecture. J. Combin. Theory Ser. B. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jctb.2018.09.004.Google Scholar
Erdős, P., On some new inequalities concerning extremal properties of graphs. In: Theory of Graphs (Proc. Colloq., Tihany, 1966). Academic Press, New York, 1966, pp. 7781.Google Scholar
Erdős, P., Some recent results on extremal problems in graph theory. In: Results, Theory of Graphs (Internat. Sympos., Rome, 1966). Gordon and Breach, New York, 1967, pp. 117123.Google Scholar
Erdős, P. and Simonovits, M., A limit theorem in graph theory. Studia Sci. Math. Hungar 1(1966), 5157.Google Scholar
Flajolet, P. and Sedgewick, R., Analytic combinatorics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801655.Google Scholar
Kang, M. and Panagiotou, K., On the connectivity of random graphs from addable classes. J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 103(2013), 306312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jctb.2012.12.001.Google Scholar
Lovász, L., Large networks and graph limits. American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications, 60, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1090/coll/060.Google Scholar
McDiarmid, C., Steger, A., and Welsh, D. J. A., Random planar graphs. J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 93(2005), 187205.Google Scholar
McDiarmid, C., Steger, A., and Welsh, D. J. A., Random graphs from planar and other addable classes. In: Topics in discrete mathematics. Algorithms Combin., 26, Springer, Berlin, pp. 231246. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-33700-8_15.Google Scholar
Rényi, A., Some remarks on the theory of trees. Magyar Tud. Akad. Mat. Kutató Int. Közl. 4(1959), 7385.Google Scholar
Simonovits, M., A method for solving extremal problems in graph theory, stability problems. In: Theory of Graphs (Proc. Colloq., Tihany, 1966). Academic Press, New York, 1968, pp. 279319.Google Scholar