Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T22:15:58.723Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Inversion and Representation Theory for the Laplace Integral of Abstractly-Valued Functions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

P. G. Rooney*
Affiliation:
University of Alberta
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The theory of the Laplace integral of abstractly-valued functions of a real or complex variable has been developed, in the last few years, to an extent that it is almost approaching the degree of completeness enjoyed by the classical theory of the Laplace integral of numerically-valued functions. In certain respects, however, there are still large gaps. One of the gaps occurs in representation theory.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1954

References

1. Bochner, S. and Taylor, A. E., Linear Junctionals on certain spaces of abstractly monotone functions, Ann. Math., 39 (1938), 913–944.Google Scholar
2. Dunford, N., Integration and linear operations, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc, 40 (1936), 474–494.Google Scholar
3. Eberlein, W. F., Weak compactness in Banach spaces, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 33 (1947), 51–53.Google Scholar
4. Hille, E., Functional analysis and semi-groups, Amer. Math. Soc. Colloq. Publications, 31 (New York, 1948).Google Scholar
5. Pettis, B. J., A proof that every uniformly convex space is reflexive, Duke Math. J., 5 (1939), 249-253.Google Scholar
6. Pettis, B. J., Differentiation in Banach spaces, Duke Math. ]., 5 (1939), 254–269.Google Scholar
7. Rooney, P. G., A new inversion and representation theory for the Laplace transformation, Can. J. Math., 4 (1952), 436–444.Google Scholar
8. Widder, D. V., The Laplace transform (Princeton, 1941).Google Scholar