Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

A participle account of Blackfoot relative clauses

  • Sara Johansson (a1)

Abstract

Blackfoot verbs are marked with nominal agreement morphology in relative clauses, in place of verbal inflection. These relative clauses have previously been analyzed as nominalizations. The present study shows that a nominalization analysis makes incorrect predictions about the morphological composition of relative clauses, as well as the availability of non-agentive and possessive constructions, and adjectival modification. This study demonstrates that relative clauses can relativize subjects, direct objects, and indirect objects. Based on observations about obviation, recursion, long-distance extraction, inflection, and word order, I propose that relative clauses are participles: clausal entities with a nominal superstructure. This accounts for their mixed clausal and nominal properties, and provides an analysis of Blackfoot relative clauses similar to those proposed for related Algonquian languages.

Résumé

Dans des propositions relatives, les verbes blackfoot sont marqués par une morphologie d’accord nominal plutôt que par une flexion verbale. Auparavant, on considérait ces propositions relatives comme des nominalisations. La présente étude montre qu’une analyse de nominalisation amène des prédictions incorrectes sur la composition morphologique des propositions relatives, aussi bien que sur la disponibilité de constructions sans agent et possessives et la modification adjectivale. Cette étude montre que les propositions relatives peuvent relativiser des sujets, et des compléments d’objet direct et indirect. Fondée sur des observations d’obviation, de récurrence, d’extraction à distance, de flexion et de l’ordre de mots, je propose que les propositions relatives sont des participes : des entités propositionnelles ayant une superstructure nominale. C’est ce qui explique le mélange de propriétés nominales et propositionnelles, et permet une analyse des propositions relatives blackfoot semblable à celle proposée pour d’autres langues algonquiennes proches.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Armoskaite, Solveiga. 2010. The destiny of roots. Doctoral Dissertation, University of British Columbia.
Baker, Mark C. 2008. The syntax of agreement and concord. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baker, Mark C. 2011. Degrees of nominalization: Clause-like constituents in Sakha. Lingua 121:11641193.
Baker, Mark C. and Vinokurova, Nadya. 2009. On agent nominalizations and why they are not like event nominalizations. Language 85:517556.
Bhatt, Rajesh. 2002. The raising analysis of relative clauses: Evidence from adjectival modification. Natural Language Semantics 10:4390.
Bliss, Heather. 2005. Formalizing point-of-view in Blackfoot. Master’s thesis, University of Calgary.
Bliss, Heather. 2010. Argument structure, applicatives, and animacy in Blackfoot. In University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics (UBCWPL) 26: The proceedings of Workshop on Structure and Constituency in Languages of the Americas (WSCLA) 13 and 14, ed. Bliss, Heather and Girard, Raphael, 5869. Vancouver: University of British Columbia.
Bliss, Heather and Ritter, Elizabeth. 2009. Speaker certainty, event realization, and epistemic modality in Siksiká Blackfoot. Ms., University of British Columbia and University of Calgary.
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1946. Algonquian. In Linguistic structures of Native America, ed. Hoijer, Harry, 85129. Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology 6. New York: Wenner-Gren Foundation.
Bruening, Benjamin. 2001. Syntax at the edge: Cross-clausal phenomena and the syntax of Passamaquoddy. Doctoral Dissertation, Massachussetts Institute of Technology.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
DeLancey, Scott. 1999. Relativization in Tibetan. In Topics in Nepalese linguistics, ed. Yadava, Yogendra P. and Glover, Warren W., 231249. Kathmandu: Royal Nepal Academy.
Dunham, Joel. 2007. The “durative” in Blackfoot: Understanding imperfectivity. In Proceedings of SULA 4: Semantics of under-represented languages in the Americas, ed. Deal, Amy Rose, 4964. University of Massachussetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics. Amherst, MA: Graduate Linguistic Student Association (GLSA).
Frantz, Donald. 2009. Blackfoot grammar. 2nd ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Frantz, Donald and Russell, Norma Jean. 1995. Blackfoot dictionary of stems, roots and affixes. 2nd ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Goddard, Ives. 1987. Fox participles. In Native American languages and grammatical typology: Papers from a conference at the University of Chicago, April 22, 1987, ed. Kroeber, Paul D. and Moore, Robert E., 105118. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hanson, Rebecca. 2011. A grammar of Yine (Piro). Doctoral Dissertation, La Trobe University.
Johansson, Sara. 2008. Sentient and stem agreement in Blackfoot. In Papers of the 39th Algonquian Conference, ed. Darnell, Regna and Hele, Karl S., 358377. London: University of Western Ontario.
Johansson, Sara and Ritter, Elizabeth. 2012. Determinants of split intransitivity in Blackfoot: Evidence from verbs of emission. In Papers of the 40th Algonquian Conference, ed. Hele, Karl S. and Valentine, J.Randolph, 171185. Albany. State University of New York. Press (SUNY) Press.
Keenan, Edward L. and Comrie, Bernard. 1977. Noun phrase accessibility and Universal Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8:6399.
Lieber, Rochelle. 2004. Morphology and lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1989. Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20:365424.
Ritter, Elizabeth and Rosen, Sara Thomas. 2005. Agreement without A-Positions: Another look at Algonquian. Linguistic Inquiry 36:648660.
Ritter, Elizabeth and Rosen, Sara Thomas. 2010. Animacy in Blackfoot: Implications for event structure and clause structure. In Syntax, lexical semantics and event structure, ed. Hovav, Malka Rappaport, Doron, Edit, and Sichel, Ivy, 124152. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ritter, Elizabeth and Wiltschko, Martina. 2009. Varieties of INFL: Tense, location, and person. In Alternatives to cartography, ed. Craenenbroeck, Jeroen van, 153202. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Speas, Margaret. 2004. Evidentiality, logophoricity and the syntactic representation of pragmatic features. Lingua 114:255276.
Speas, Margaret and Tenny, Carol. 2003. Configurational properties of Point of View roles. In Asymmetry in grammar, ed. Scuillo, Anna Maria Di, 315344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Uhlenbeck, Christianus Cornelius. 1938. A concise Blackfoot grammar based on material from the southern Peigans. Amsterdam: Noord-Hollandsche uitgeversmaatschappij.
Valentine, J. Randolph. 2001. Nishnaabemwin reference grammar. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Wolfart, Hans Christoph. 1973. Plains Cree: A grammatical study. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, New Series 63, Part 5. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.
Zanuttini, Raffaella. 1997. Negation and clausal structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed