Article contents
Marking Difference in American Commerce: Trademarks and Alterity at Century's Ends*
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 July 2014
Extract
Since 1930, the mascot of Robertson'sR Marmalade, England's GolliwogR (who looks like Buckwheat, but a bit more nattily attired) has appeared on over 20 million pieces of merchandise—from teapots to toothbrushes to T-shirts … When Golly was criticized in 1984 by some of England's “oversensitive” black population, a Robertson's spokesman righteously declared, “the Golly forms part of our national tradition and attacking it is an attack on a part of British culture.”
This anecdote attracts both our cultural and legal attention. Capturing the central role of trademarks in national culture, it also points to a politics of ownership and protest. Accounting for its significance theoretically, however, is no easy task. Somehow, it resists easy accommodation in any of the three dominant approaches towards the commodified imagery of late capitalism.
- Type
- “Intervention”
- Information
- Canadian Journal of Law and Society / La Revue Canadienne Droit et Société , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , Fall/automne 1995 , pp. 119 - 128
- Copyright
- Copyright © Canadian Law and Society Association 1995
References
1. Whitehead, Colin, “Review of White on Black” Voice Literary Supplement (25 October 1992)Google Scholar.
2. Jameson, Fredric, Postmodernism or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1991)Google Scholar.
3. See Ross, Andrew, ed., Universal Abandon? The Politics of Postmodernism (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1988)Google Scholar; Ross, Andrew, No Respect: Intellectuals and Popular Culture (New York: Routledge, Chapman & Hall, 1989)Google Scholar; Mercer, Kobena, “Welcome to the Jungle: Identity and Diversity in Postmodern Politics” in Rutherford, Jonathan, ed., Identity: Community, Culture, Difference (London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1990) 43Google Scholar.
4. See Taussig, Michael, Mimesis and Alterity: An Alternative History of the Senses (New York: Routledge, Chapman & Hall 1993)Google Scholar.
5. See Calhoun, Craig, “Civil Society and the Public Sphere” (1993) 5 Public Culture 267CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Garnham, Nicholas, “The Mass Media, Cultural Identity, and the Public Sphere in the Modern World” (1993) 5 Public Culture 251CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Polan, Dana, “The Public's Fear: or, Media as Monster in Habermas, Negt, and Kluge” in Robbins, Bruce, ed., The Phantom Public Sphere (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1993) 33Google Scholar.
6. Michael Warner, “The Mass Public and the Mass Subject” in Robbins, supra note 5, 234 at 242.
7. Ibid. at 243.
8. Coombe, Rosemary J., “Beyond Modernity's Meanings: Encountering the Postmodern in Cultural Anthropology” (1991) 11 Culture 111Google Scholar; Coombe, Rosemary J., “Objects of Property and Subjects of Politics: Intellectual Property and Democratic Dialogue” (1991) 69 Texas Law Review 1853Google Scholar; Coombe, Rosemary J., “Authorizing the Celebrity: Publicity Rights, Postmodern Politics, and Unauthorized Genders” (1992) 10 Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal 365Google Scholar, reprinted in Woodmansee, Martha & Jaszi, Peter, eds., The Construction of Authorship: Textual Appropriations in Law and Literature (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1994) 101Google Scholar; Coombe, Rosemary J., “Publicity Rights and Political Aspiration: Mass Culture, Gender Identity, and Democracy” (1992) 26 New England Law Review 1221Google Scholar; Coombe, Rosemary J., “Tactics of Appropriation and the Politics of Recognition in Late Modern Democracies” (1993) 21 Political Theory 411CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Coombe, Rosemary J., “The Properties of Culture and the Politics of Possessing Identity: Native Claims in the Cultural Appropriation Debates” (1993) 6 Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 349CrossRefGoogle Scholar, abbreviated and reprinted in Engle, Karen & Danielson, Dan, eds., After Identity: Essays in Law, Culture and Politics (New York: Routledge, Chapman & Hall, 1994) 251Google Scholar; Coombe, Rosemary J., “The Cultural Life Of Things: Anthropological Approaches to Law and Society In Conditions of Globalization” (1995) 10 American University Journal of International Law and Policy 791Google Scholar; Coombe, Rosemary J., Cultural Appropriations: Authorship, Alterity and the Law (New York: Routledge, Chapman & Hall, [forthcoming in 1996] [hereinafter Cultural Appropriations]Google Scholar; Coombe, Rosemary J. & Stoller, Paul, “X Marks the Spot: The Ambiguities of African Trading in the Commerce of the Black Public Sphere” (1994) 7 Public Culture 249CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
9. Lauren Berlant, “National Brands/National Body: Imitation of Life” in Robbins, supra note 5, 173 [hereinafter Imitation of Life].
10. Lee, Benjamin, “Going Public” (1993) 5 Public Culture 165CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
11. Berlant, supra note 9.
12. Warner, supra note 6.
13. Ibid. at 239.
14. Ibid.
15. Ibid.
16. See Nancy Fraser, “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy” in Robbins, supra note 5, 1.
17. Warner, supra note 6 at 240.
18. Anderson, Ben, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (New York: Verso, 1991)Google Scholar.
19. Coombe, Cultural Appropriations, supra note 8.
20. Engle, Sally Merry, “Resistance and the Cultural Power of Law” (1995) 29: 1Law & Society Review 11Google Scholar.
21. Berlant, supra note 9.
22. Buck, Glen, Trademark Power: An Expedition into an Unprobed and Inviting Wilderness (Chicago: Monroe & Southworth, 1916)Google Scholar.
23. Rydell, Robert, All the World's Fair: Visions of Empire at American International Expositions, 1876-1916 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984)Google Scholar.
24. Taussig, supra note 4.
25. Ibid. at 213.
26. Price, Benjamin & Steuart, Arthur, American Trade-Mark Cases Decided by the Courts of the United States, both State and Federal and by the Commissioner of Patents, and Reported Between 1879 and 1887 (Baltimore: Cushings & Bailey, 1887) at 429Google Scholar.
27. Ibid. at 429.
28. Coombe, Cultural Appropriations, supra note 8.
- 1
- Cited by