No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Philosophy of the Limit
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 June 2015
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Books Reviews
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 1993
References
1. The Philosophy of the Limit (New York: Routledge, Chapman and Hall, Inc., 1992).
2. Ch. 2, from “The Poststructuralist Challenge to the Idealof Community” (1987) 8 Cardozo L.R. 989; ch. 3, from “Post-Structuralism, the Ethical Relation, and the Law” (1988) 9 Cardozo L.R. 1587; ch. 5, from “Time, Deconstruction, and the Challenge to Legal Positivism; the Call for Judicial Responsibility” (1990) 2 Yale J. ofL. and Humanities 267; ch. 6, from “The Violence of the Masquerade; Law Dressed Up as Justice” (1990) 11 Cardozo L.R. 1047, and somewhat less from “Civil Disobedience and Deconstruction” (1991) 13 Cardozo L.R. 1309.
3. “A judge cannot refuse to adjudicate under pretext of the silence, obscurity or insufficiency of the law.” Civil Code of Lower Canada, L.Q., 1865, c. 41, art. 11 (Province of Canada); not carried forward into the Civil Code of Quebec, L.Q., 1991, c. 64, which has just now replaced the former civil code.
4. Drucilla Cornell, “Toward a Modern/Postmodern Reconstructionof Ethics” (1985) 133 U. Pa. L.R. 291.
5. Cornell, Drucilla , “Institutionalization of Meaning, Recollective Imagination, and the Potential for Transformative Legal Interpretation” (1988) 136 U. Pa.L.R. 1135;CrossRefGoogle Scholar two reviews, Donato, James, “Dworkin and Subjectivity in Legal Interpretation” (1988) 40 Stanford L.R. 1517 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Moore, Michael S., “Metaphysics, Epistemology and Legal Theory: Review of ‘A Matter of Principle’ by Dworkin” (1987) 60 So. Cal. L.R. 453.Google Scholar
6. Supra, note 4; “Beyond Tragedy and Complacency” (1987) 81 Northwestern U.L.R. 693.
7. Passim; but especially in conjunction with Dworkin; and with Wittgenstein, in “‘Convention’ and Critique” (1986) 7 Cardozo L.R. 679, and in “Two Lectures on the Normative Dimensions of Community in the Law” (1987) 54 Tenn. L.R. 327, “The Problem of Normative Authority in Legal Interpretation” and“In Defence of Dialogic Reciprocity”.
8. Ibid.; and supra, note 5, (1988) 136 U. Pa. L.R.
9. Ibid.
10. “Taking Hegel Seriously: Reflections on Beyond Objectivism and Relativism (by R. Bernstein)” (1985) 7 Cardozo L.R. 139.
11. Supra, note 5, (1988) 136 U. Pa. L.R. 1135; and derivatively in “In Union: A Critical Review of Toward a Perfected State (by Paul Weiss)” (1987) 136 U. Pa. L.R. 1087.
12. Elsewhere, she comments upon Brown v. The Board of Education; and in (1988) 136 U. Pa. L.R. 1135 on the N.L.R.A. One legal institution is developed at length under this rubric in her “Dialogic Reciprocity and the Critique of Employment at Will” (1989) 10Cardozo L.R. 1575, republished as Cornell, Drucilla, Rosenfeld, Michel & Carlson, David Gray, eds, Hegeland Legal Theory (New York: Routledge, 1991).Google Scholar
13. Benhabib, Seyla and Cornell, Drucilla, eds, Intro. (“Beyond the Politics of Gender”), Feminism as Critique: Essays on the Politics of Gender in Late-Capitalist Societies (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1987)Google Scholar; “The Doubly-Prized World: Myth, Allegory and Feminism” (1990) 75 Cornell L.R. 644; “Sexual Difference, the Feminine and Equivalency: A Critique of MacKinnon’s Toward a Feminist Theory of the State ” (1991) 100 Yale LJ. 2247; Beyond Accommodation: Ethical Feminism, Deconstruction, and the Law (New York: Routledge, 1991); “Gender, Sex, and Equivalent Rights“ in Feminists Theorize the Political, in Butler, Judith & Scott, Joan W., eds, (New York: Routledge, 1992);Google Scholar Sexual Difference, Politics and the Law (Routledge, forthcoming).