Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-78dcdb465f-jsbx8 Total loading time: 0.298 Render date: 2021-04-15T18:53:19.613Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Révision de la liste de raisons de consultation du Système canadien d’information de gestion des départements d’urgence (SIGDU), version 1.1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2015

Eric Grafstein
Affiliation:
De l'hôpital St. Paul's et de l'Université de la Colombie-Britannique, Vancouver (C.-B.)
Michael J. Bullard
Affiliation:
de l'Hôpital de l'Université de l'Alberta et l'Université de l'Alberta, Edmonton (Alb.)
David Warren
Affiliation:
de l'Hôpital pour enfants, centre des sciences de la santé de London, Université Western Ontario, London (Ont.)
Bernard Unger
Affiliation:
de l'Hôpital général juif–S.M.B.D., Université McGill, Montréal (Québec)
le groupe de travail national sur l’ÉTG
Affiliation:
comprend des représentants de l'Association canadienne des médecins d'urgence (ACMU), de l'Affiliation nationale des infirmières et infirmiers d'urgence (ANIIU), de l'Association des médecins d'urgence du Québec (AMUQ), de la Société canadienne de pédiatrie (SCP) et de la Société de la médecine rurale du Canada (SMRC)
Corresponding

Abstract

Image of the first page of this article. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.
Type
Mise à jour de l'ACMU • CAEP Update
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2008

References

1.Grafstein, E, Unger, B, Bullard, M, et al. Canadian Emergency Department Information System (CEDrosoph Inf Serv) Presenting Complaint List (Version 1.0). CJEM 2003;5:2734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Beitel, AJ, Olson, KL, Reis, BY, et al. Use of emergency department chief complaint and diagnostic codes for identifying respiratory illness in a paediatric population. Pediatr Emerg Care 2004;20:355–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Terry, W, Ostrowsky, B, Huang, A. Should we be worried? Investigation for signals generated by an electronic syndromic surveillance system — Westchester County, New York. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2004;53(Supp):190–5.Google ScholarPubMed
4.Mikosz, CA, Silva, J, Black, S, et al. Comparison of two major emergency department-based free-text chief complaint coding systems. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2004;53(Suppl):101–5.Google ScholarPubMed
5.Irvin, CB, Nouhan, PP, Rice, K. Syndromic analysis of computerized emergency department patients’ chief complaints: an opportunity for bioterrorism and influenza surveillance. Ann Emerg Med 2003;41:447–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Murray, M, Bullard, M, Grafstein, E. Revisions to the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale implementation guidelines. CJEM 2004;6:421–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Gouin, S, Gravel, J, Amre, DK, et al. Evaluation of the Paediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale in a pediatric ED. Am J Emerg Med 2005;23:243–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Gravel, J, Gouin, S, Bailey, B, et al. Evaluation of the validity of a computerized version of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale in a paediatric emergency department [résumé]. CJEM 2007;9:183.Google Scholar
9.Grafstein, E, Innes, G, Westman, J, et al. Inter-rater reliability of a computerized presenting-complaint-linked triage system in an urban emergency department. CJEM 2003;5:323–9.Google Scholar
10.Aronsky, D, Kendall, D, Merkley, K, et al. A comprehensive set of coded chief complaints for the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2001;8:980–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Gorelick, MH, Alpern, ER, Alessandrini, EA. A system for grouping presenting complaints: the paediatric emergency reason for visit cluster. Acad Emerg Med 2005;12:723–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Chapman, WW, Dowling, JN, Wagner, MM. Classification of emergency department chief complaints into 7 syndromes: a retrospective analysis of 527,228 patients. Ann Emerg Med 2005;46:445–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Travers, DA, Haas, SW. Evaluation of emergency medical text processor, a system for cleaning chief complaint text data. Acad Emerg Med 2004; 11:1170–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Thompson, DA, Eitel, D, Fernandes, CMB, et al. Coded chief complaints — automated analysis of free-text complaints. Acad Emerg Med 2006;13:774–82.Google ScholarPubMed
15.Institut canadien d’information sur la santé. Système national d’information sur les soins ambulatoires (SNISA). Disponible sur : http://secure.cihi.ca/cihiweb/dispPage.jsp?cw_page=services_nacrs_f (Consulté le 20 janvier 2008).Google Scholar
16.Bullard, MJ, Unger, B, Spence, J, et al. Revisions to the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) adult guidlines. CJEM 2008;10:136–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 110 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 15th April 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

You have Access

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Révision de la liste de raisons de consultation du Système canadien d’information de gestion des départements d’urgence (SIGDU), version 1.1
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Révision de la liste de raisons de consultation du Système canadien d’information de gestion des départements d’urgence (SIGDU), version 1.1
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Révision de la liste de raisons de consultation du Système canadien d’information de gestion des départements d’urgence (SIGDU), version 1.1
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *