Skip to main content Accessibility help

#OpenAccess: Free online, open-access crowdsource-reviewed publishing is the future; traditional peer-reviewed journals are on the way out

  • John R. Adler (a1), Teresa M. Chan (a2), J. Bruce Blain (a3), Brent Thoma (a4) and Paul Atkinson (a5)...


  • An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided below. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.


Corresponding author

Correspondence to: Dr. Teresa Chan, 237 Barton St. E., Hamilton General Hosptial, McMaster Clinics, Room 255, Hamilton, ON, L8L 2X2; Email:


Hide All
1.Enserink, M. European funders seek to end reign of paywalled journals. Science 2018;361(6406):957-8.10.1126/science.361.6406.957
2.Schmitt, J. Paywall: The Business of Scholarship (Full Movie) CC BY 4.0. Vimeo; 2018. Available at: (accessed October 1, 2018).
3.Van Noorden, R. Open access: the true cost of science publishing. Nature 2013;495(7442):426-9.10.1038/495426a
4.Harnad, S. Crowd-sourced peer review: substitute or supplement for the current outdated system? LSE Impact Blog; 2014. Available at:
5.Sidalak, D, Purdy, E, Luckett-Gatopoulos, S, et al. Coached peer review: developing the next generation of authors. Acad Med 2017;92(2):201-4.10.1097/ACM.0000000000001224
6.Fecher, B, Friesike, S. Opening Science; 2014. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8.
7.Willinsky, J. The unacknowledged convergence of open source, open access, and open science. First Monday. 2005;10(8). Available at:
8.Buranyi, S. Is the staggeringly profitable business of scientific publishing bad for science? The Guardian; 2017. Available at: (accessed September 7, 2018).
9.Steinhart, G, McLaren, C. arXiv Member Institutions. arXiv public wiki.
10.Author, N. Advertising. Cureus. (accessed September 7, 2018).
11.No Author. Channels. Cureus.
12.Jensen, MC. From the desk of Michael C. Jensen, Chairman. Social Sciences Research Network; 2016. Available at:
13.No Author. Browse SSRN's Partners in Publishing. Social Sciences Research Network.
14.Nickson, CP, Cadogan, MD. Free Open Access Medical education (FOAM) for the emergency physician. Emerg Med Australas 2014;26(1):76-83.10.1111/1742-6723.12191
15.Cadogan, M, Thoma, B, Chan, TM, Lin, M. Free Open Access Meducation (FOAM): the rise of emergency medicine and critical care blogs and podcasts (2002–2013). Emerg Med J 2014;31 e1:e76-7.10.1136/emermed-2013-203502
16.Chan, TM, Gottlieb, M, Sherbino, J, et al. The ALiEM Faculty Incubator. Acad Med 2018;93(10):1497-1502.10.1097/ACM.0000000000002309
17.Gisondi, MA, Chou, A, Joshi, N, et al. Curriculum design and implementation of the emergency medicine chief resident incubator. Cureus 2018;10(2):e2223.
18.Dolgin, E. PubMed Commons closes its doors to comments. Nature; 2018. Available at: (accessed September 7, 2018).
19.O'Grady, C. 107 cancer papers retracted due to peer review fraud. ARS Technical; 2017. Available at:
20.Harnad, S. Crowd-sourced peer review: substitute or supplement for the current outdated system? The Impact Blog; 2014. Available at: (accessed September 7, 2018).
21.Castelvecchi, D. Google unveils search engine for open data. Nature 2018;561(7722):161-2.10.1038/d41586-018-06201-x
22.Artino, AR, Driessen, EW, Maggio, LA. Ethical shades of gray. Acad Med 2018, doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000002412.



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed