Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

#OpenAccess: Free online, open-access crowdsource-reviewed publishing is the future; traditional peer-reviewed journals are on the way out

  • John R. Adler (a1), Teresa M. Chan (a2), J. Bruce Blain (a3), Brent Thoma (a4) and Paul Atkinson (a5)...

Abstract

  • An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided below. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Correspondence to: Dr. Teresa Chan, 237 Barton St. E., Hamilton General Hosptial, McMaster Clinics, Room 255, Hamilton, ON, L8L 2X2; Email: teresa.chan@medportal.ca

References

Hide All
1.Enserink, M. European funders seek to end reign of paywalled journals. Science 2018;361(6406):957-8.10.1126/science.361.6406.957
2.Schmitt, J. Paywall: The Business of Scholarship (Full Movie) CC BY 4.0. Vimeo; 2018. Available at: vimeo.com/273358286 (accessed October 1, 2018).
3.Van Noorden, R. Open access: the true cost of science publishing. Nature 2013;495(7442):426-9.10.1038/495426a
4.Harnad, S. Crowd-sourced peer review: substitute or supplement for the current outdated system? LSE Impact Blog; 2014. Available at: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2014/08/21/crowd-sourced-peer-review-substitute-or-supplement/.
5.Sidalak, D, Purdy, E, Luckett-Gatopoulos, S, et al. Coached peer review: developing the next generation of authors. Acad Med 2017;92(2):201-4.10.1097/ACM.0000000000001224
6.Fecher, B, Friesike, S. Opening Science; 2014. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8.
7.Willinsky, J. The unacknowledged convergence of open source, open access, and open science. First Monday. 2005;10(8). Available at: https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1265/1185.10.5210/fm.v10i8.1265
8.Buranyi, S. Is the staggeringly profitable business of scientific publishing bad for science? The Guardian; 2017. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/jun/27/profitable-business-scientific-publishing-bad-for-science (accessed September 7, 2018).
9.Steinhart, G, McLaren, C. arXiv Member Institutions. arXiv public wiki.
10.Author, N. Advertising. Cureus. https://www.cureus.com/advertising (accessed September 7, 2018).
11.No Author. Channels. Cureus.
12.Jensen, MC. From the desk of Michael C. Jensen, Chairman. Social Sciences Research Network; 2016. Available at: https://www.ssrn.com/en/index.cfm/ssrn-joins-mendeley-elsevier.
13.No Author. Browse SSRN's Partners in Publishing. Social Sciences Research Network.
14.Nickson, CP, Cadogan, MD. Free Open Access Medical education (FOAM) for the emergency physician. Emerg Med Australas 2014;26(1):76-83.10.1111/1742-6723.12191
15.Cadogan, M, Thoma, B, Chan, TM, Lin, M. Free Open Access Meducation (FOAM): the rise of emergency medicine and critical care blogs and podcasts (2002–2013). Emerg Med J 2014;31 e1:e76-7.10.1136/emermed-2013-203502
16.Chan, TM, Gottlieb, M, Sherbino, J, et al. The ALiEM Faculty Incubator. Acad Med 2018;93(10):1497-1502.10.1097/ACM.0000000000002309
17.Gisondi, MA, Chou, A, Joshi, N, et al. Curriculum design and implementation of the emergency medicine chief resident incubator. Cureus 2018;10(2):e2223.
18.Dolgin, E. PubMed Commons closes its doors to comments. Nature; 2018. Available at: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-01591-4 (accessed September 7, 2018).
19.O'Grady, C. 107 cancer papers retracted due to peer review fraud. ARS Technical; 2017. Available at: https://arstechnica.com/science/2017/04/107-cancer-papers-retracted-due-to-peer-review-fraud/.
20.Harnad, S. Crowd-sourced peer review: substitute or supplement for the current outdated system? The Impact Blog; 2014. Available at: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2014/08/21/crowd-sourced-peer-review-substitute-or-supplement/ (accessed September 7, 2018).
21.Castelvecchi, D. Google unveils search engine for open data. Nature 2018;561(7722):161-2.10.1038/d41586-018-06201-x
22.Artino, AR, Driessen, EW, Maggio, LA. Ethical shades of gray. Acad Med 2018, doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000002412.

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed