Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

MP009: Reliability and interchangeability of measures of two tissue oximeters in healthy volunteers

  • A. Cournoyer (a1), A. Denault (a1), S. Cossette (a1), A. Fortier (a1), J. Chauny (a1), R. Daoust (a1), M. Iseppon (a1) and E. Notebaert (a1)...

Abstract

Introduction: Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is a non-invasive, continuous and painless method of monitoring oxygen saturation of hemoglobin in any given superficial tissue. Given that hemodynamic instability can affect the oxygen saturation, NIRS could prove to be an interesting tool in quantifying tissue oxygenation, consequently guiding clinical management. The aim of this study was to compare the reliability of two commonly used tissue oximeters, the INVOS 5100c from Covidien and the Equanox 7600 from Nonin. We postulated the Equanox (a more recent tissue oximeter) would have a better reliability than the INVOS. As a secondary outcome, we evaluated whether the measures given by the two oximeters were comparable. Methods: The study population was composed of healthy adult volunteers. Three measurements were taken at six different sites on both sides of the body in a randomized order. Two different sensors were used for each measure. From these measures, two intra-class correlations (ICC) - one inter-sensor and the other intra-sensor - were calculated for each device and compared using the Fisher’s r-to-z transformation method. An additional inter-device ICC was also calculated. We considered ICCs over 0.75 as an indicator of good reliability, while ICCs under 0.40 were considered to represent poor reliability. The sample size was calculated based on the calculation of a unidirectional confidence interval for a parametric ICC. Expecting a 0.75 ICC value, we concluded that 53 participants needed to be recruited in order to attain 80% power and a range of 0.1 towards the low values. Results: Fifty-three healthy volunteers (27 men and 26 women) with a mean age of 31 years (standard deviation 10) were recruited. We found no differences between the repeatability of the INVOS and the Equanox for both inter and intra-sensor reliability (ICC=0.94 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86-0.97) versus ICC=0.92 (95%CI 0.86-0.95), p=0.42 and ICC=0.94 (95%CI 0.89-0.96) versus ICC=0.96 (95%CI 0.93-0.98), p=0.21, respectively). However, when compared directly, we found that the readings produced by the two oximeters varied considerably (ICC 0.18 (95%CI -0.10 to 0.43). Conclusion: When taken individually, both tissue oximeters displayed good inter and intra-sensor reliability. However, they oximeters displayed poor inter-devices agreement, their readings varying considerably amongst each other.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      MP009: Reliability and interchangeability of measures of two tissue oximeters in healthy volunteers
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      MP009: Reliability and interchangeability of measures of two tissue oximeters in healthy volunteers
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      MP009: Reliability and interchangeability of measures of two tissue oximeters in healthy volunteers
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Keywords

MP009: Reliability and interchangeability of measures of two tissue oximeters in healthy volunteers

  • A. Cournoyer (a1), A. Denault (a1), S. Cossette (a1), A. Fortier (a1), J. Chauny (a1), R. Daoust (a1), M. Iseppon (a1) and E. Notebaert (a1)...

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.