Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T08:23:55.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fomepizole in the treatment of ethylene glycol poisoning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2015

Tammy L. Hall*
Affiliation:
Emergency Medicine, Pharmacy Department, The Ottawa Hospital — Civic Campus, Ottawa, Ont.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The management of ethylene glycol poisoning is reviewed, with a focus on the use of the new antidote fomepizole. Ethylene glycol is a widely used industrial agent that is also easily obtained commercially, usually as radiator antifreeze. Ingestion of as little as 30 to 60 mL can result in death or serious permanent disability. Traditional management of poisoning includes the use of ethanol, with or without hemodialysis. Activated charcoal is not indicated, and gastric lavage may be beneficial only in the first hour after ingestion. Cofactors such as pyridoxine and thiamine may be beneficial in patients deficient in these vitamins. A new antidote, fomepizole, has recently been approved for use in Canada. Like ethanol, it is a competitive inhibitor of alcohol dehydrogenase. Potential benefits of fomepizole include its ease of administration and lack of serious adverse effects. Fomepizole may be recommended over ethanol in situations in which avoidance of ethanol-induced side effects is imperative or when ethanol is not readily available. Further studies are required to verify its comparative efficacy and cost-effectiveness compared to ethanol.

Type
Toxicology • Toxicologie
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2002

References

1.Jacobsen, D, McMartin, K.Antidotes for methanol and ethylene glycol poisoning. Clin Toxicol 1997;35:12743.Google Scholar
2.Product monograph of Antizol. Minnetonka (MN): Orphan Medical Inc.; Dec 1997.Google Scholar
3.Schauben, J.Methanol and ethylene glycol toxicity. US Pharmacist 1998;23(suppl):2233.Google Scholar
4.Barceloux, DG, Krenzelok, EP, Olson, K, Watson, W.American Academy of Clinical Toxicology practice guidelines on the treatment of ethylene glycol poisoning. Clin Toxicol 1999;37:53760.Google ScholarPubMed
5.Church, AS, Witting, MD.Laboratory testing in ethanol, methanol, ethylene glycol, and isopropanol toxicities. J Emerg Med 1997;15:68792.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Hylander, B, Kjellstrand, CM.Prognostic factors and treatment of severe ethylene glycol intoxication. Intensive Care Med 1996;22:54652.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Glaser, DS.Utililty of the serum osmolal gap in the diagnosis of methanol or ethylene glycol ingestion. Ann Emerg Med 1996;27:3436.Google Scholar
8.Brent, J.Antidotes and alcohols: Has fomepizole made ethanol an obsolete therapy? Internet J Med Toxicol 1998;1(1):2. Available: www.ijmt.net/1_1/1_1_2.html (accessed 2002 Jan 21).Google Scholar
9.Sivilotti, MLA, Burns, MJ, McMartin, KE, Brent, J.Toxicokinetics of ethylene glycol during fomepizole therapy: implications for management. Ann Emerg Med 2000;36:11425.Google Scholar
10.Baud, FJ, Bismuth, C, Garnier, R, Galliot, M, Astier, A, Maistre, G, et al. 4-Methylpyrazole may be an alternative to ethanol therapy for ethylene glycol intoxication in man. Clin Toxicol 1987;24:46383.Google Scholar
11.Baud, FJ, Galliot, M, Astier, A, Vu Bien, D, Garnier, R, Likforman, J, et al. Treatment of ethylene glycol poisoning with intravenous 4-methylpyrazole. N Engl J Med 1988;319:97100.Google Scholar
12.Harry, P, Turcant, G, Bouachour, G, Houze, P, Alquier, P, Allain, P.Efficacy of 4-methylpyrazole in ethylene glycol poisoning: clinical and toxicokinetic aspects. Hum Exp Toxicol 1994;13:614.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Brent, J, McMartin, K, Phillips, S, Burkhart, KK, Donovan, JW, Wells, M, et al. Fomepizole for the treatment of ethylene glycol poisoning. N Engl J Med 1999;340:8328.Google Scholar
14.Tenenbein, M.Recent advancements in pediatric toxicology. Emerg Med 1999;46:117988.Google Scholar
15.Shannon, M.Toxicology reviews: fomepizole — a new antidote. Pediatr Emerg Care 1998;14:1702.Google Scholar