Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Does the CATCH clinical decision rule adequately determine which children with minor head injury require computed tomography (CT) imaging?

  • Miles Hunter (a1), Nicholas Packer (a1) and Shawn Dowling (a1)

Abstract

  • An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided below. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Correspondence to: Dr. Miles Hunter, 1-530 33 Street NW, CalgaryAB, T2N 2W4; Email: mmhunter@ucalgary.ca

References

Hide All
1.Osmond, MH, Klassen, TP, Wells, GA, et al. CATCH: a clinical decision rule for the use of computed tomography in children with minor head injury. CMAJ 2010;182:341–8.
2.Kuppermann, N, Holmes, JF, Dayan, PS, et al. Identification of children at very low risk of clinically-important brain injuries after head trauma: a prospective cohort study. Lancet 2009;374:1160E70.
3.Lyttle, MD, Crowe, L, Oakley, E, et al. Comparing CATCH, CHALICE and PECARN clinical decision rules for paediatric head injuries. Emerg Med J 2012;29:785–94.
4.McGinn, TG, Guyatt, GH, Wyer, PC, et al. Users’ guides to the medical literature: XXII: how to use articles about clinical decision rules. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 2000;284(1):7984.

Keywords

Does the CATCH clinical decision rule adequately determine which children with minor head injury require computed tomography (CT) imaging?

  • Miles Hunter (a1), Nicholas Packer (a1) and Shawn Dowling (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed