Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T19:32:54.612Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Can nurses apply the Canadian C-Spine Rule? A pilot study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2015

Anne-Maree Kelly ,
Luke Bradshaw  and
Debra Kerr
Anne-Maree Kelly*
Affiliation:
Joseph Epstein Centre for Emergency Medicine Research, Western Health, and The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Luke Bradshaw
Affiliation:
Advanced Medical Science Program, The University of Melbourne
Debra Kerr
Affiliation:
Joseph Epstein Centre for Emergency Medicine Research, Western Health, and The University of Melbourne
*
Joseph Epstein Centre for Emergency Medicine Research, Western Hospital, Private Bag, Footscray 3011, Australia; 03 8345 6315, fax 03 9318 4790, Anne-Ma ree.Kelly@wh.org.au

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

The aim of this study was to determine the inter-rater agreement between physicians and nurses regarding eligibility for application of the Canadian C-Spine Rule (CCR) and assessment of the criteria of the CCR.

Methods:

In this observational study, nurses and physicians independently assessed the CCR criteria in a convenience sample of patients with potential C-spine injury. Data were entered onto separate data sheets. The outcomes of interest were the inter-rater agreement between nurse and physician regarding eligibility for application of the rule, for assessment of each component of the rule and for interpretation of the rule overall, assessed by kappa analysis.

Results:

In total, 88 cases were eligible for analysis. Physicians and nurses agreed on which patients were eligible for CCR application in 96.6% of cases. Inter-rater agreement for most CCR criteria was good (κ > 0.61), with the exception of midline tenderness (κ = 0.58) and range of motion, which most nurses did not test.

Conclusion:

This study shows that nurses have the potential to reliably apply the Canadian C-Spine Rule but require further training in the assessment of midline tenderness and range of motion.

Keywords

cervical spine clearancenursesCanadian C-Spine Rule
Type
EM Advances • Innovations en MU
Information
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , May 2004 , pp. 161 - 164
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2004

References

1.American College of Surgeons. Advanced trauma life support instructor manual. 5th ed. Chicago: The College; 1993.Google Scholar
2.Stiell, IG, Wells, GA, Vandemheen, KL, Clement, CM, Lesiuk, H, De Maio, VJ, et al. The Canadian C-spine rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients. JAMA 2001;286:1841–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Hoffman, JR, Mower, WR, Wolfson, AB, Todd, KH, Zucker, MI.Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study Group [published erratum appears in N Engl J Med 2001;344(6):464] N Engl J Med 2000;343(2):94–9.Google Scholar
4.Stiell, IG, Clement, CM, McKnight, RD, Brison, R, Schull, MJ, Rowe, BH, et al. The Canadian C-spine rule versus the NEXUS low-risk criteria in patients with trauma. N Engl J Med 2003;349(26);2510–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Karpas, A, Hennes, H, Walsh-Kelly, CM.Utilization of the Ottawa ankle rules by nurses in a pediatric emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2002;9(2):130–3.Google Scholar
6.Kec, RM, Richman, PB, Szucs, PA, Mandell, M, Eskin, B.Can emergency department triage nurses appropriately utilize the Ottawa Knee Rules to order radiographs? An implementation trial. Acad Emerg Med 2003;10(2):146–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed