Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T01:35:43.163Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SURVIVAL AND REPRODUCTIVE CAPACITY OF THE TOBACCO BUDWORM, HELIOTHIS VIRESCENS (LEPIDOPTERA: NOCTUIDAE), IRRADIATED AS DIAPAUSING AND YOUNG NONDIAPAUSING PUPAE1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

F. I. Proshold  and
D. T. North
F. I. Proshold
Affiliation:
Metabolism and Radiation Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Fargo, North Dakota 58102
D. T. North
Affiliation:
Metabolism and Radiation Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Fargo, North Dakota 58102
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pupal survival, mating, and sperm transfer in tobacco budworms, Heliothis virescens (F.), irradiated as diapause pupae, decreased proportionately with increasing doses of 3, 5, and 7.5 krad. Also, the fertility of tobacco budworms irradiated as nondiapause pupae and of the F1 progeny of such males decreased with increasing dose. When the female partner received eupyrene sperm, insects irradiated while the pupae were in diapause were fertile as were their progeny. Therefore, it does not appear plausible to irradiate diapause pupae of our strain of tobacco budworms to obtain sterile insects for a release program.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 110 , Issue 6 , 01 June 1978 , pp. 575 - 581
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bodine, J.H. and Evans, T.C.. 1934. Respiration and development of individual mud dauber wasp larvae following X-irradiation. Physiol. Zool. 7: 550–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cloutier, E.J. and Beck, S.D.. 1963. Spermatogenesis and diapause in the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 56: 253–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochran, W.G. 1954. Some methods for strengthening the commonχ2 tests. Biometrics 10: 417–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Sayed, E.I. and Graves, J.B.. 1969 a. Effects of gamma radiation on the tobacco budworm. I. Irradiation of pupae. J. econ. Ent. 62: 289–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Sayed, E.I. and Graves, J.B.. 1969 b. Effects of gamma radiation on the tobacco budworm. II. Irradiation of moths. J. econ. Ent. 62: 293–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, T.C. 1935. Variations in the susceptibility to X-rays of Melanoplus differentialis eggs during development. Physiol. Zool. 8: 521–529.Google Scholar
Flint, H.M. and Kressin, E.L.. 1967. Gamma irradiation of pupae of the tobacco budworm. J. econ. Ent. 60: 1655–1659.Google Scholar
Flint, H.M. 1968. Gamma irradiation of the tobacco budworm: Sterilization, competitiveness, and observations on reproductive biology. J. econ. Ent. 61: 477–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flint, H.M. 1969. Transfer of sperm by radiation sterilized Heliothis virescens (Fab.) and its relationship to fecundity. Can. Ent. 101: 500–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, L.D. and Hardwood, R.F.. 1968. Comparison of diapause and non-diapause larvae of the codling moth, Carpocapsa pomonella. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 61: 1611–1617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machida, J. 1929. Eine experimentelle Untersuchung über die apyrene Spermatozoen des Seidenspinners Bombyx mori L. Z. Zellforsch. mikrok. Anat. 9: 466–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nishiitsutsuji-Uwo, J. 1959. Developmental features of the male germ cells in the prospective diapausing and nondiapausing swallowtails, Papilio xuthus. Mem. Coll. Sci. Univ. Kyoto (B) 26: 9–14.Google Scholar
Phillips, J.R. and Newsom, L.D.. 1966. Diapause in Heliothis zea and Heliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 59: 154–159.Google Scholar
Proshold, F.I. and Bartell, J.A.. 1972 a. Difference in radiosensitivity of two colonies of tobacco budworms, Heliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Can. Ent. 104: 995–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proshold, F.I. and Bartell, J.A.. 1972 b. Inherited sterility and postembryonic survival of two generations of tobacco budworms, Heliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), from partially sterile males. Can. Ent. 104: 221–230.Google Scholar
Proshold, F.I. and LaChance, L.E.. 1974. Analysis of sterility in hybrids from interspecific crosses between Heliothis virescens and H. subflexa. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 67: 445–449.Google Scholar
Raun, E.S., Lewis, L.C., Picken, J.C. Jr., and Hotchkiss, D.K.. 1967. Gamma irradiation of European corn borer larvae. J. econ. Ent. 60: 1724–1730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roach, A.H. and Adkisson, P.L.. 1971. Termination of pupal diapause in the bollworm. J. econ. Ent. 64: 1057–1060.Google Scholar
Sado, T. 1963. Spermatogenesis of the silkworm and its bearing on radiation induced sterility. I–II. Kyushu Univ. Fac. Agric. J. 12: 359–404.Google Scholar
Santa, H. and Otuka, M.. 1955. Studies on the diapause in the cabbage armyworm, Barathra brassicae L. IV. Development of the male sex cells under conditions inducing diapause and nondiapause. Bull. natn. Inst. Agric. Sci. (Tokyo) (C) 5: 58–72.Google Scholar
Sokal, R.R. and Rohlf, F.J.. 1969. Biometry. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Wolfenbarger, D.A. and Guerra, A.A.. 1972. Sexual competitiveness of 60Co-irradiated tobacco budworm. J. econ. Ent. 65: 1596–1600.Google Scholar