Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:05:02.363Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SPATIAL DISPERSION AND SEQUENTIAL SAMPLING OF THE POTATO APHID, MACROSIPHUM EUPHORBIAE (HOMOPTERA: APHIDIDAE), ON PROCESSING-TOMATOES IN OHIO1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Gregory P. Walker
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio 44691
Laurence V. Madden
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio 44691
Donald E. Simonet
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio 44691

Abstract

Spatial dispersion of potato aphids was studied in fields of processing-tomatoes for 2 years to develop a sequential sampling scheme for the aphid. Potato aphids were found on upper, middle, and lower leaf strata in the percentages 60, 31, and 8. Dispersion was clumped, apterates more so than alates. Among-plant variance was generally greater than within-plant variance. There was a good linear relationship between mean crowding and the population mean and an excellent linear fit between log variance and log mean on all leaf strata for green and pink forms of the aphid and for alates and apterates. The log variance – log mean relationship was used as a basis for sequential sampling.

Résumé

La distribution spatiale du puceron de la pomme de terre a été étudiée dans des champs de tomates destinées à la confection d'aliments préparés pendant 2 ans afin d'élaborer un plan d'échantillonnage séquentiel. Les pourcentages de pucerons collectionnés dans les strates supérieure, médiane et inférieure étaient de 60, 31 et 8%. La distribution était agrégée, celle des aptères plus que celle des ailés. La variance inter-plants était généralement plus grande que la variance intra-plant. On a observé une relation linéaire entre le groupement moyen et la population moyenne, de même qu'une relation linéaire très bien ajustée entre le log de la variance et le log de la moyenne sur toutes les strates, pour les biotypes vert et rose ainsi que pour les ailés et les aptères du puceron. La relation log variance/log moyenne a été choisie pour établir l'échantillonnage séquentiel.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barlow, C. A. 1962. The influence of temperature on the growth of experimental populations of Myzus persicae (Sulzer) and Macrosiphum euphorbiae (Thomas) (Aphididae). Can. J. Zool. 40: 146156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R. H. E. 1952. Methods of recording aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae) population on potatoes and the distribution of species on the plant. Can. Ent. 84: 93102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, W. 1973. Insects in Relation to Plant Disease. Wiley, N.Y.759 pp.Google Scholar
Draper, N. R. and Smith, H.. 1981. Applied Regression Analysis, 2nd ed. Wiley, N.Y.709 pp.Google Scholar
Green, R. H. 1970. On fixed precision level sequential sampling. Researches Popul. Ecol. Kyoto Univ. 12: 249251.Google Scholar
Hassell, M. P. 1978. The Dynamics of Arthropod Predator-Prey Systems. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, N.J.237 pp.Google ScholarPubMed
Houser, J. S., Guyton, T. L., and Lowry, P. R.. 1917. The pink and green aphid of potato. Ohio agric. Exp. Stn Bull. 317: 6088.Google Scholar
Iwao, S. 1968. A new regression method for analyzing the aggregation pattern of animal populations. Researches Popul. Ecol. Kyoto Univ. 10: 120.Google Scholar
Kennedy, J. S., Day, M. F., and Eastop, V. F.. 1962. A Conspectus of Aphids as Vectors of Plant Viruses. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, London. 114 pp.Google Scholar
Kuno, E. 1969. A new method of sequential sampling to obtain the population estimates with a fixed level of precision. Researches Popul. Ecol Kyoto Univ. 11: 127136.Google Scholar
Lange, W. H. and Bronson, L.. 1981. Insect pests of tomatoes. A. Rev. Ent. 26: 345371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, M. 1967. “Mean Crowding”. J. Anim. Ecol. 36: 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O.C.E.S. 1980. Ohio guidelines for production of machine-harvested tomatoes – 1980. Ohio Coop. Extension Service Bull. 647.Google Scholar
Radcliffe, E. B. and Lauer, F. I.. 1970. Further studies on resistance to green peach aphid and potato aphid in the wild tuber bearing Solanum species. J. econ. Ent. 63: 110114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shands, W. A., Simpson, G. W., and Reed, L. B.. 1954. Subunits for estimating aphid abundance on potatoes. J. econ. Ent. 47: 10241027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G.. 1980. Statistical Methods, 7th ed. The Iowa State University Press, Ames. 507 pp.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. E. 1955. Growth of the potato plant and aphid colonization. Ann. appl. Biol. 43: 151156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, L. R. 1965. A natural law for the spatial disposition of insects. Proc. XII int. Congr. Ent. pp. 396397.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. R. 1970. Aggregation and the transformation of counts of Aphis fabae Scop. on beans. Ann. appl. Biol. 65: 181189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, G. P. 1982. The dispersion and abundance of the potato aphid (Macrosiphum euphorbiae [Thomas]) on tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Ph.D. Dissertation, Ohio State Univ., University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, Mich.Google Scholar
Waters, W. E. 1955. Sequential sampling on forest insect surveys. Forest Sci. 1: 6879.Google Scholar
Wightman, J. A. and Gibson, R. W.. 1972. Comparison of the distribution of the pink and green biotypes of the potato aphid, Macrosiphum euphorbiae (Thos.) on potato plants. Plant Path. 21: 6972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar