Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T17:34:04.612Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A REVISION OF THE NEOTROPICAL GENUS BDELYRUS HAROLD (COLEOPTERA: SCARABAEIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Joyce Cook
Joyce Cook
Affiliation:
R.R. 3 North Augusta, Ontario, Canada K0G 1R0
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The genus Bdelyrus Harold is revised. Twenty new species are described: B. amazonensis, B. apaporisae, B. boliviensis, B. braziliensis, B. bromeliatilis, B. genieri, B. gilli, B. grandis, B. howdeni, B. iauaretensis, B. laplanadae, B. leptomerus, B. lobatus, B. metaensis, B. paraensis, B. parvoculus, B. parvus, B. pecki, B. peruviensis, and B. triangulus. Separate keys are given for males and females. Descriptions, illustrations, and range maps are provided, and a phylogenetic analysis is included.

Résumé

On trouvera ici la révision du genre Bdelyrus Harold. Vingt nouvelles espèces sont décrites : B. amazonensis, B. apaporisae, B. boliviensis, B. braziliensis, B. bromeliatilis, B. genieri, B. gilli, B. grandis, B. howdeni, B. iauaretensis, B. laplanadae, B. leptomerus, B. lobatus, B. metaensis, B. paraensis, B. parvoculus, B. parvus, B. pecki, B. peruviensis et B. triangulus. Des clés distinctes permettront d’identifier les mâles et les femelles. Des descriptions, illustrations et cartes de répartition ainsi que les résultats d’une analyse phylogénétique sont également présentés.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 130 , Issue 5 , October 1998 , pp. 631 - 689
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bates, H.W. 1887. Biologia Centrali-Americana, Insecta, Coleoptera, Vol. 2, pp. 25–160, Pls. 2–8.Google Scholar
Bush, M.B. 1994. Amazonian speciation: a necessarily complex model. Journal of Biogeography 21: 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cambefort, Y. 1991 a. From saprophagy to coprophagy. pp. 22–35in Hanski, I., and Cambefort, Y. (Eds.), Dung Beetle Ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Cambefort, Y. 1991 b. Biogeography and evolution. pp. 51–67in Hanski, I., and Cambefort, Y. (Eds.), Dung Beetle Ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, B.D. 1991. Dung beetles in tropical American forests. pp. 211–229in Hanski, I., and Cambefort, Y. (Eds.), Dung Beetle Ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haffer, J. 1987. Quaternary history of tropical America. pp. 1–18in Whitmore, T.C., and Prance, G.T. (Eds.), Biogeography and Quaternary History in Tropical America. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
Halffter, G., and Martinez, A.. 1977. Revision monografica de los Canthonina Americanos, Pt. IV. Folia Entomologica Mexicana 38: 29–107.Google Scholar
Halffter, G., and Matthews, E.G.. 1966. The natural history of dung beetles of the subfamily Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Folia Entomologica Mexicana, nos. 12–14, 312 pp.Google Scholar
Harold, E. von. 1869. Diagnosen neuer Coprophagen. Coleopterologische Hefte 5: 95–104.Google Scholar
Howden, H.F., and Young, O.P.. 1981. Panamanian Scarabaeinae: taxonomy, distribution and habits (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). Contributions of the American Entomological Institute 18: 1–204.Google Scholar
Huijbregts, J. 1984. Bdelyrus geijskesi, a new scarab (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) from Suriname associated with Bromeliaceae. Zoologische Mededelingen 59: 61–67.Google Scholar
Maddison, W.P., and Maddison, D.R.. 1992. MacClade: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution. Version 3.0. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
Pereira, F.S., Vulcano, M.A., and Martinez, A.. 1960. O genero Bdelyrus Harold, 1869. Actas y Trabajos de Primer Congreso Sudamericano de Zoologia 3: 155–164.Google Scholar
Pessôa, S.B., and Lane, F.. 1941. Coleópteros necrófagos de interêsse médico-legal. Ensáio monográfico sôbre a família Scarabaeidae de S. Paulo e regiões vizinhas. Archos de Zoología do Estado de São Paulo 2: 389–504.Google Scholar
Richards, P.W. 1996. The tropical rain forest, an ecological study. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Vulcano, M.A., and Pereira, F.S.. 1967. Sinopse dos Passalidae e Scarabaeidae s. str. da regiao Amazonica (Insecta, Coleoptera). Atas do Simposio sobre a Biota Amazonica 5: 533–603.Google Scholar
Waterhouse, C.O. 1890. Descriptions of new species of Pedaria, with observations on allied Scarabaeidae. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 1890: 374–380.Google Scholar
Watrous, L.E., and Wheeler, Q.D.. 1981. The out-group comparison method of character analysis. Systematic Zoology 30: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar