Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-nptnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-26T09:18:16.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN MITES AND INSECTS IN FOREST HABITATS1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Evert E. Lindquist
Evert E. Lindquist
Affiliation:
Entomology Research Institute, Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 102 , Issue 8 , August 1970 , pp. 978 - 984
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atyeo, W. T., and Baker, E. W.. 1964. Tarsocheylidae, a new family of prostigmatic mites (Acarina). Bull. Univ. Nebraska St. Mus. 4: 243–256.Google Scholar
Baker, E. W., and Wharton, G. W.. 1952. An introduction to Acarology. Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
Butler, L., and Hunter, P. E.. 1968. Redescription of Megisthanus floridanus with observations on its biology (Acarina: Megisthanidae). Fla Ent. 51: 187–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooreman, J. 1951. Notes et observations sur les Acariens, (IV). Bull. Inst. r. Sci. nat. Belg. 27: 4–7.Google Scholar
Corbet, P. S. 1963. The reliability of parasitic water-mites (Hydracarina) as indicators of physiological age in mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). Ent. exp. appl. 6: 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, G. O., Sheals, J. G., and Macfarlane, D.. 1961. The terrestrial Acari of the British Isles. Vol. I. Adlard, Bartholomew Press, Dorking.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, W. 1960. Gangsystematik der Parasitiformes. Teil 3: Die Gattung Dendrolaelaps Halbert 1915. Acarologie, SchrReihe vergl. Milbenk., Fürth 3, pp. 1–27, 28 pl.Google Scholar
Hunter, P. E., and Davis, R.. 1965. Mites associated with the passalus beetle III. Life stages and observations on the biology of Euzercon latus (Banks) (Acarina: Euzerconidae). Acarologia 7: 30–42.Google Scholar
Hunter, P. E., and Glover, S.. 1968. The genus Diarthrophallus Trägårdh, 1946. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 70: 193–197.Google Scholar
Hunter, P. E., and Mollin, K.. 1964. Mites associated with the passalus beetle. I: Life stages and seasonal abundance of Cosmolaelaps passali n. sp. (Acarina: Laelaptidae). Acarologia 6: 247–256.Google Scholar
Lindquist, E. E. 1962. Mucroseius monochami, a new genus and species of mite (Acarina: Blattisocidae) symbiotic with sawyer beetles. Can. Ent. 94: 972–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindquist, E. E. 1963. A taxonomic review of the genus Hoploseius Berlese (Acarina: Blattisocidae). Can. Ent. 95: 1175–1185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindquist, E. E. 1965. An unusual new species of Hoploseius Berlese (Acarina: Blattisociidae) from Mexico. Can. Ent. 97: 1121–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindquist, E. E. 1969 a. Review of holarctic tarsonemid mites (Acarina: Prostigmata) parasitizing eggs of ipine bark beetles. Mem. ent. Soc. Can., No. 60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindquist, E. E. 1969 b. New species of Tarsonemus (Acarina: Tarsonemidae) associated with bark beetles. Can. Ent. 101: 1291–1314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindquist, E. E. 1969 c. Mites and the regulation of bark beetle populations. Proc. 2nd int. Congr. Acarology, Sutton Bonington (England), 1967. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest. pp. 389–399.Google Scholar
Lindquist, E. E., and Hunter, P. E.. 1965. Some mites of the genus Proctolaelaps Berlese (Acarina: Blattisociidae) associated with forest insect pests. Can. Ent. 97: 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyonet, P. 1829. Anatomie de différentes espèces d'insectes. (Premier article). Mém. Mus. Hist. nat. 18: 233–312.Google Scholar
MacKay, M. R. 1968. The North American Aegeriidae (Lepidoptera): a revision based on late-instar larvae. Mem. ent. Soc. Can., No. 58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oudemans, A. C. 1902. New list of Dutch Acari, Second part. Tijdschr. Ent. 45: 1–52.Google Scholar
Pielou, D. P., and Verma, A. N.. 1968. The arthropod fauna associated with the birch bracket fungus, Polyporus betulinus, in Eastern Canada. Can. Ent. 100: 1179–1199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regenfuss, H. 1968. Untersuchungen zur Morphologie, Systematik und Ökologie der Podapolipidae (Acarina, Tarsonemini). Z. wiss. Zool. 177: 183–282.Google Scholar
Rosický, B., and Mrciak, M.. 1967. The concept of the acarinium and the acarinia zones. Fol. Parasit. 14: 349–360.Google Scholar
Samšiňák, K. 1966. Relation between mites and insects. Zesz. Probl. Postepow nauk Rolniczych 65: 77–87.Google Scholar
Soper, R. S. Jr., and Olson, R. E.. 1963. Survey of biota associated with Monochamus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in Maine. Can. Ent. 95: 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trägårdh, I. 1950. Description of a new species of Heterocheylus Lombardini from Africa, with notes on the classification of the Pseudocheyletidae. Ent. Tidskrift 71: 104–110.Google Scholar
Treat, A. E., and Niederman, L.. 1967. Three species of Proctolaelaps (Acarina, Mesostigmata) from noctuid moths. Am. Mus. Novit., No. 2312.Google Scholar