Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T19:32:53.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A REDEFINITION OF MYLLAENINI GANGLBAUER AND REDESCRIPTIONS OF CAMACOPALPUS MOTSCHULSKY AND POLYPEA FAUVEL (COLEOPTERA: STAPHYLINIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Jan Klimaszewski
Jan Klimaszewski
Affiliation:
Museum of Natural History, Sienkiewicza 21, 50–335 Wroclaw, Poland Biosystematics Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The staphylinid tribe Myllaenini Ganglbauer is redefined, and Polypea Fauvel and Camacopalpus Motschulsky are redescribed and transferred from Myllaenini, the former to Diglottini Eichelbaum, the latter to Zyrasini Lohse. Camacopalpus flavicornis Motschulsky and C. bituberculatus Motschulsky are transferred to Drusilla Leach, and a new genus Neocamacopalpus is described to include Camacopalpus fulvus Motschulsky. Lectotypes are designated for all studied species, and their terminalia and genitalia are illustrated for the first time. A hypothetical phylogeny of Myllaenini is proposed.

Résumé

L'ouvrage redéfinit la tribu des Myllaenini (Staphylinidés) redécrit et transfert Polypea Fauvel et Camacopalpus Motschulsky des Myllaenini, le premier aux Diglottini Eichelbaum, l'autre aux Zyrasini Lohse. Camacopalpus flavicornis Motschulsky et C. bituberculatus Motschulsky deviennent Drusilla Leach et un nouveau genre Neocamacopalpus est décrit pour inclure Camacopalpus fulvus Motschulsky. Des lectotypes sont désignés pour toutes les espèces étudiées et leurs terminalia et genitalia sont illustrés pour la première fois. L'auteur propose un phylogénie hypothétique des Myllaenini.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 114 , Issue 5 , May 1982 , pp. 411 - 429
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bernhauer, M. and Scheerpeltz, O.. 1926. Staphylinidae. pp. 499–988in Junk, W. (Ed.), Coleopterorum catalogus. Pars 82. Berlin.Google Scholar
Blackwelder, R.E. 1944. Checklist of the coleopterous insects of Mexico, Central America, the West Indies, and South America. Bull. U.S. natn Mus. 185. 188 pp.Google Scholar
Blackwelder, R.E. 1952. The generic names of the beetle family Staphylinidae with an essay on genotypy. Bull. U.S. nat. Mus. 200. pp. I–IV + 483 pp.Google Scholar
Blatchley, W.S. 1910. An illustrated descriptive catalogue of the Coleoptera or beetles (exclusive of the Rhynchophora) known to occur in Indiana. Indianapolis, Ind. 1386 pp.Google Scholar
Cameron, M. 1920–1921. New species of Staphylinidae from Singapore. Part IV. Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond.: 347–413.Google Scholar
Cameron, M. 1933. Remarks on some of Motschulsky's types of Staphylinidae (Col.). Entomologist's mon. Mag. 69: 219–220.Google Scholar
Cameron, M. 1939. The Fauna of British India, Including Ceylon and Burma. Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, 4, pt. 2, 37 figs., pls. 1–3, London. pp. 411–691.Google Scholar
Champion, G.Ch. 1887. On the priority of various generic names in use in British Coleoptera. Entomologist's mon. Mag. 23: 227–230.Google Scholar
Crotch, G.R. 1870. The genera of Coleoptera studied chronologically (1802–1821). Trans. ent. Soc. Lond.: 213–241.Google Scholar
Eichelbaum, F. 1909. Katalog der Staphyliniden — Gattungen nebst Angabe ihrer Literatur, Synonyme, Artenzahl, geographischen Verbreitung und ihrer bekannten Larvenzustände. Mém. Soc. r. ent. Belg. 17: 17–280.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J.Ch. 1801. Systema eleutheratorum…, Vol. 2. Kiliae. 687 pp.Google Scholar
Fauvel, Ch. A. 1878. Les staphylinides de Moluques et de la Nouvelle Guinée. Annali Mus. civ. Stor. nat. Genova 12: 171–315.Google Scholar
Fenyes, A. 1918. Coleoptera: Fam. Staphylinidae, subfam. Aleocharinae. Genera Insectorum 173a, pp. 1–110.Google Scholar
Fenyes, A. 1920. Coleoptera: Fam. Staphylinidae, subfam. Aleocharinae. Genera Insectorum 173b. pp. 111–414.Google Scholar
Ganglbauer, L. 1895. Die Käfer von Mitteleuropa … Familienreihe Staphylinoidea 1. Theil: Staphylinidae, Pselaphidae. Vol. 2. Wien. 880 pp.Google Scholar
Gemminger, M. and Harold, E.. 1868. Catalogus coleopterorum hucusque descriptorum synonymicus et systematicus 2. Munich. pp. 425–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haliday, A.H. 1837. Notes about Cillenum laterale and a submarine species of Aleocharinae. Ent. Mag. 4: 251–253.Google Scholar
Hammond, P. 1975. The phylogeny of a remarkable new genus and species of gymnusine staphylinid (Coleoptera) from the Auckland Islands. J. Ent. (B) 44(2): 153–173, 26 figs.Google Scholar
Jacquelin du Val, P. N. C. 1856–1857. Genera des Coléoptères d'Europe II. Paris. pp. 1–40 (1856), pp. 41–96 (1857).Google Scholar
Johansen, J.P. 1914. Danmarks Rovbiller eller Billefam. Staphylinidae's danske Slaegter og Arter. Kobenhavn. 660 pp.Google Scholar
Klimaszewski, J. 1979. A revision of the Gymnusini and Deinopsini of the world. Col.: Staphylinidae, Aleocharinae. Agric. Can. Monogr. 25. 169 pp.Google Scholar
Klimaszewski, J. 1982. Studies of Myllaenini (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae, Aleocharinae). I. Systematics, phylogeny, and zoogeography of Nearctic Myllaena Erichson. Can. Ent. 114: 181–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, W.E. 1824. New Genera. In Samouelle, The Entomologist's Useful Compendium. London (2nd ed. of 1819). 496 pp.Google Scholar
Lohse, G.A. 1974. Band 5. Staphylinidae II (Hypocyphtinae und Aleocharinae) Pselaphidae. In Freude, H., Harde, K.W., and Lohse, G.A., Die Käfer Mitteleuropas. Krefled. 381 pp.Google Scholar
Moore, I. and Legner, E. F.. 1974. Bibliography (1758-1972) of the Staphylinidae of America North of Mexico (Coleoptera). Hilgardia 42: 511–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, I. and Legner, E. F.. 1975. A Catalogue of the Staphylinidae of America North of Mexico (Coleoptera). Div. Agric. Sci. Univ. Calif. 514 pp.Google Scholar
Moore, I. and Orth, R. E.. 1979. Diglotta legneri, a new seashore beetle from California (Col., Staphylinidae). Coleopts Bull. 33(3): 337–340.Google Scholar
Motschulsky, V. 1858. Enumeration des nouvelles espèces de coléoptères rapportés de ses voyages. Bull. Soc. imp. Nat. Moscou: 204–264.Google Scholar
Portevin, G. 1929. Histoire naturelle des Coléoptères de France I. Adephaga, Polyphaga-Staphylino-idea. Paris. 630 pp., 5 pls.Google Scholar
Reitter, E. 1909. Fauna Germanica. Die Käfer des Deutschen Reiches II. Stuttgart. 392 pp.Google Scholar
Samouelle, G. 1819. New Genera. The Entomologist's Useful Compendium. London. 496 pp.Google Scholar
Samouelle, G. 1824. Second edition of 1819.Google Scholar
Scheerpeltz, O. 1930. Coleoptera. In Brohmer, P., Die Tierwelt Mitteleuropas. Vol. 2. Leipzig. 272 pp.Google Scholar
Scheerpeltz, O.1933–1934. Staphylinidae VII, VIII (Suppl. I, II). pp. 989–1881in Junk, (Ed.), Coleopterorum Catalogus. Partes 129, 130. Berlin.Google Scholar
Seevers, Ch. H. 1978. A generic and tribal revision of the North American Aleocharinae (Col.: Staphylinidae). Fieldiana, Zool., Vol. 71. Chicago. 289 pp.Google Scholar
Tottenham, Ch. E. 1949. The generic names of the British Staphylinidae with a check list of the species. pp. 343–466in The Generic Names of British Insects, pt. 9. London.Google Scholar
Watrous, L.E. and Wheeler, Q. D.. 1981. The out-group comparison method of character analysis. Syst. Zool. 30(1): 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar