Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-nptnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-24T18:32:28.002Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

POTENTIAL OF ANTIFEEDANTS TO CONTROL LARVAL FEEDING OF SELECTED NEODIPRION SAWFLIES (HYMENOPTERA: DIPRIONIDAE)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

J. N. All  and
D. M. Benjamin
J. N. All
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, Athens
D. M. Benjamin
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin, Madison
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Antifeedants for controlling larval feeding of several Neodiprion sawflies were evaluated in laboratory and field studies. Nine commercially available insect antifeedants and a hexane extract of the juvenile foliage of jack pine, Pinus banksiana Lambert, were tested on larvae of six species. In laboratory bioassays larvae exhibited varying sensitivity to antifeedants; generally species with monophagous or restricted oligophagous feeding habits were most sensitive. In the laboratory the Swaine jack pine sawfly, Neodiprion swainei Middleton, had severely restricted feeding, development, survival, and fecundity. Triphenyltin hydroxide was toxic to N. swainei and to European pine sawfly, N. sertifer (Geoffroy). In field tests certain antifeedants disrupted N. swainei feeding and development. The colonial behavior of larvae often was disrupted and solitary larvae fell from trees or wandered on twigs. Colony disruption by most antifeedants was temporary and many larvae resumed feeding.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 108 , Issue 11 , November 1976 , pp. 1137 - 1144
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

All, J. N., and Benjamin, D. M.. 1975 a. Deterrent(s) in jack pine, Pinus banksiana, influencing larval feeding behavior and survival of Neodiprion swainei and N. rugifrons. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 68: 495–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
All, J. N., and Benjamin, D. M.. 1975 b. A feeding preference bioassay for Neodiprion sawflies. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 68: 553–556.Google Scholar
All, J. N., and Benjamin, D. M.. 1975 c. Influence of semi-purified constituents of juvenile jack pine, Pinus banksiana, foliage and other pine derived chemicals on feeding of Neodiprion swainei and N. rugifrons larvae. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 68: 1095–1101.Google Scholar
Becker, G. C. Jr., and Benjamin, D. M.. 1964. Biology of the Swaine jack-pine sawfly in Wisconsin. Can. Ent. 96: 589–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jermy, T. and Matolcsy, G.. 1967. Antifeeding effect of some systematic compounds on chewing phytophagous insects. Acta Phytopath. 2: 219–224.Google Scholar
Lyons, L. A. 1962. The effect of aggregation on egg and larval survival in Neodiprion swainei Midd. (Hymenoptera: Diprionidae). Can. Ent. 94: 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, D. M. 1970. Quinol stimulation and quinone deterrency of gustation by Scolytus multistriatus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 63: 476–478.Google Scholar
Philogène, B. J. R. and Benjamin, D. M.. 1971. Temperature and photoperiod effects on the immature stages and adults of Neodiprion swainei (Hymenoptera: Diprionidae). Can. Ent. 103: 1705–1715.Google Scholar
Thomas, H. A. 1969. Quantitative bioassay used to study inhibitory effects of two organotins in pales weevil feeding. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. Res. Note SE-118. 3 pp.Google Scholar
Tostowaryk, W. 1971. Relationship between parasitism and predation of diprionid sawflies. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 64: 1424–1427.Google Scholar
Wright, D. P. 1967. Antifeedants. In Pest control. Academic Press, New York. pp. 287–293.Google Scholar