Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-03T20:52:42.227Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

PHENOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE STATUS OF ADULT REDBACKED CUTWORMS, EUXOA OCHROGASTER (GUENÉE) (LEPIDOPTERA: NOCTUIDAE), IN SOUTHERN MANITOBA1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

G.H. Gerber
Affiliation:
Agriculture Canada Research Station, 195 Dafoe Road, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2M9
J. Walkof
Affiliation:
Agriculture Canada Research Station, 195 Dafoe Road, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2M9

Abstract

The phenology and reproductive status of adults of the redbacked cutworm, Euxoa ochrogaster (Guenée), were determined from blacklight (BLT) and sex-attractant (SAT) trap catches at four locations in southern Manitoba in 1987 through 1989. The flight period was of 9–12 weeks duration, extending from late June to early October. The first male and female moths were captured at about the same time in the BLT and SAT. The peak catches of the BLT occurred during the first 3 weeks of August (weeks 5 and 6 of the flight period) and those of the SAT about 1 week later. The SAT continued to capture male moths for 2–3 weeks after the last moths appeared in the BLT. Most females captured during the first 2–3 weeks of the flight period were virgins who had not yet initiated egg development. Most mating, egg development, and oviposition took place during a 3- to 4-week period that included the 2 weeks before, the same week as, and the week after the peak BLT catches (weeks 3–7 of the flight period); these activities occurred in the 3–4 weeks before the peak SAT catches. The data suggested that there was competition between SAT and females in attracting males and, consequently, the SAT catch data may not be providing accurate measurements of the sizes of breeding populations of males in the field. The BLT catches underestimated the length of the flight period by about 1.5–3 weeks.

Résumé

Des adultes du Ver-gris à dos rouge, Euxoa ochrogaster (Guenée), ont été capturés au moyen de pièges lumineux (BLT) et de pièges garnis de phéromones sexuelles (SAT) en quatre points du sud du Manitoba de 1987 à 1989; leur phénologie et leur statut reproducteur a été étudié. La période de vol durait 9–12 semaines, soit de la fin de juin au début d’octobre. Les premiers papillons mâles et femelles ont été capturés à peu près en même temps dans les deux types de pièges. Les périodes de capture maximales des pièges BLT ont eu lieu au cours des 3 premières semaines d’août (semaines 5 et 6 de la période de vol), et celles des pièges SAT, environ 1 semaine plus tard. Les pièges SAT ont continué de capturer des papillons mâles pendant environ 2–3 semaines après les dernières captures des pièges BLT. La plupart des femelles capturées au cours des 2–3 premières semaines de la période de vol étaient des femelles vierges chez lesquelles les oeufs n’avaient pas encore commencé à se développer. Les accouplements, le développement des oeufs et la ponte étaient concentrés surtout au cours d’une période de 3–4 semaines recouvrant les 2 semaines précédant l’efficacité maximale des pièges BLT, la semaine de leur efficacité maximale et la semaine suivante (semaines 3–7 de la période de vol); ces activités avaient lieu 3–4 semaines avant la période d’efficacité maximale des pièges SAT. Les données indiquent que les femelles faisaient compétition aux pièges SAT pour attirer les mâles et, conséquemment, les pièges SAT ne permettent pas d’obtenir des mesures exactes des populations de mâles reproducteurs en nature. Les pièges BLT sous-estiment la durée de la période de vol d’environ 1,5–3 semaines.

[Traduit par la rédaction]

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkinson, N.J. 1927. A preliminary study of the biology and morphology of the redbacked cutworm (Euxoa ochrogaster Gn.). M.Sc. thesis, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask. 142 pp.Google Scholar
Ayre, G.L., and Lamb, R.J.. 1990. Life histories, flight patterns, and relative abundance of nine cutworms (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Manitoba. The Canadian Entomologist 122: 10591070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, W.C., Buntin, G.D., and Pedigo, L.P.. 1985. Phenology of the adult stalk borer, Papaipema nebris (Guenée), (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Iowa. Environmental Entomology 14: 267271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buntin, G.D., Pedigo, L.P., and Showers, W.B.. 1990. Temporal occurrence of the variegated cutworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) adults in Iowa with evidence for migration. Environmental Entomology 19: 603608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byers, J.R., and Struble, D.L.. 1987. Monitoring population levels of eight species of noctuids with sex-attractant traps in southern Alberta, 1978–1983: Specificity of attractants and effect of target species abundance. The Canadian Entomologist 119: 541556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byers, J.R., Struble, D.L., and Schaalje, G.B.. 1987. Monitoring population levels of eight species of noctuids with sex-attractant traps in southern Alberta, 1978–1983: Consistency of trap catches and precision of population estimates. The Canadian Entomologist 119: 557566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byers, J.R., Struble, D.L., and Schaalje, G.B.. 1988. Monitoring population levels of eight species of noctuids with sex-attractant traps in southern Alberta, 1978–1983: Congruency of year-to-year fluctuations in intraspecific density shown by subsets of monitoring sites. The Canadian Entomologist 120: 10711078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drummond, B.A. III, 1984. Multiple mating and sperm competition in the Lepidoptera. pp. 291–300 in qSmith, R.L. (Ed.), Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems. Academic Press, New York, NY. 687 pp.Google Scholar
Gerber, G.H., Walkof, J., and Juskiw, D.. 1992. Portable, solar-powered charging system for blacklight traps. The Canadian Entomologist 124: 553554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardwick, D.F. 1965. The ochrogaster group of the genus Euxoa (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), with description of a new species. The Canadian Entomologist 97: 673678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howlader, M.A. 1985. The biology of calling behaviour in the Bertha armyworm, Mamestra configurata Walker (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Ph.D. thesis, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man. 108 pp.Google Scholar
Howlader, M.A., and Gerber, G.H.. 1986 a. Calling behavior of the bertha armyworm, Mamestra configurata (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). The Canadian Entomologist 118: 735743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howlader, M.A., and Gerber, G.H.. 1986 b. Effects of age, egg development, and mating on calling behavior of the bertha armyworm, Mamestra configurata Walker (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). The Canadian Entomologist 118: 12211230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, L.A. 1970. Laboratory ecology of the redbacked cutworm, Euxoa ochrogaster (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). The Canadian Entomologist 102: 8589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, K.M. 1926. The redbacked cutworm and its control in the prairie provinces. Canada Department of Agriculture Pamphlet 69 (new series): 13 pp.Google Scholar
King, K.M., and Atkinson, N.J.. 1928. The biological control factors of the immature stages of Euxoa ochrogaster Gn. (Lepidoptera, Phalaenidae) in Saskatchewan. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 21: 167188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palaniswamy, P., Galka, B., and Timlick, B.. 1990. Phenology and infestation level of the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), in southern Manitoba. The Canadian Entomologist 122: 12111220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philip, H., and Mengersen, E.. 1989. Insect Pests of the Prairies. University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. 122 pp.Google Scholar
Struble, D.L., Buser, H.R., Am, H., and Swailes, G.E.. 1980. Indentification of sex pheromone components of redbacked cutworm, Euxoa ochrogaster, and modification of sex attractant blend for adult males. Journal of Chemical Ecology 6: 573584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Struble, D.L., and Jacobson, L.A.. 1970. A sex pheromone in the redbacked cutworm. Journal of Economic Entomology 63: 841844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, N., and Thomas, R.C. Jr, 1956. A fixative for use in dissecting insects. Stain Technology 31: 2526.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, C.B. 1939. An analysis of four years captures of insects in a light trap. Part I. General survey; sex proportion; phenology; and time of flight. Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London 89: 79132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar