Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:42:31.669Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Life-history data for the funnel weavers Eratigena agrestis and Eratigena atrica (Araneae: Agelenidae) in the Pacific Northwest of North America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2017

Samantha Vibert*
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, 888 University Drive, Burnaby, British Columbia, V5A 1S6, Canada
Maxence Salomon
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, 888 University Drive, Burnaby, British Columbia, V5A 1S6, Canada Department of Biology, Douglas College, 700 Royal Avenue, New Westminster, British Columbia, V3M 5Z5, Canada
Catherine Scott
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, 888 University Drive, Burnaby, British Columbia, V5A 1S6, Canada Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, 1265 Military Trail, Scarborough, Ontario, M1C 1A4, Canada
Gwylim S. Blackburn
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, 11455 Saskatchewan Drive, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E9, Canada
Gerhard Gries
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, 888 University Drive, Burnaby, British Columbia, V5A 1S6, Canada
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: vibert@sfu.ca).

Abstract

The life history of the funnel weaver Eratigena agrestis (Walckenaer) (Araneae: Agelenidae) is not well studied despite its widespread occurrence in Europe and its establishment and spread in the Pacific Northwest of North America since its introduction in the early 20th century. We report phenology and life-history data for E. agrestis and another co-occurring funnel weaver, Eratigena atrica (Koch), in two study sites in British Columbia, Canada. The most notable difference in phenology between the two Eratigena species was the timing of emergence: E. atrica spiderlings emerge in the fall whereas E. agrestis spiderlings emerge in the spring. Surprisingly, the contrasting densities of E. atrica in the two study sites and the presence of the western black widow spider, Latrodectus hesperus Chamberlin and Ivie (Araneae: Theridiidae), in one study site had little effect on the life history of E. agrestis. This unexpected finding may be explained by (i) low overall competition pressure in the study habitats, (ii) conspecifics and heterospecifics exerting equivalent competition or predation pressures; and/or (iii) aggregations of heterospecifics providing benefits that offset costs associated with any competition.

Type
Behaviour & Ecology
Copyright
© Entomological Society of Canada 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Subject editor: Christopher Buddle

References

Bennett, R.G. and Vetter, R.S. 2004. An approach to spider bites. Erroneous attribution of dermonecrotic lesions to brown recluse or hobo spider bites in Canada. Canadian Family Physician, 50: 10981101.Google Scholar
Bilde, T., Coates, K.S., Birkhofer, K., Bird, T., Maklakov, A.A., Lubin, Y., and Aviles, L. 2007. Survival benefits select for group living in a social spider despite reproductive costs. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 20: 24122426.Google Scholar
Bolzern, A., Burckhardt, D., and Hänggi, A. 2013. Phylogeny and taxonomy of European funnel-web spiders of the TegenariaMalthonica complex (Araneae: Agelenidae) based upon morphological and molecular data. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 168: 723848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, R. and Vest, D.K. 1989. The hobo spider and other European house spiders. Burke Museum Educational Bulletin, 1: 14.Google Scholar
Dodson, G.N. and Beck, M.W. 1993. Pre-copulatory guarding of penultimate females by male crab spiders, Misumenoides formosipes . Animal Behaviour, 46: 951959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Environment Canada. 2015. Historical climate data [online]. Available from http://climate.weather.gc.ca [accessed 24 December 2016].Google Scholar
Fahey, F.B. and Elgar, A.M. 1997. Sexual cohabitation as mate-guarding in the leaf-curling spider Phonognatha graeffei Keyserling (Araneoidea, Araneae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 40: 127133.Google Scholar
Jakob, E.M. 1991. Costs and benefits of group living for pholcid spiderlings: losing food, saving silk. Animal Behaviour, 41: 711722.Google Scholar
McKeown, N., Vetter, R.S., and Hendrickson, R.G. 2014. Verified spider bites in Oregon (USA) with the intent to assess hobo spider venom toxicity. Toxicon, 84: 5155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oelbermann, K. and Scheu, S. 2002. Effects of prey type and mixed diets on survival, growth and development of a generalist predator, Pardosa lugubris (Araneae: Lycosidae). Basic and Applied Ecology, 3: 285291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team. 2015. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Salomon, M. 2011. The natural diet of a polyphagous predator, Latrodectus hesperus (Araneae: Theridiidae), over one year. Journal of Arachnology, 39: 154160.Google Scholar
Salomon, M., Vibert, S., and Bennett, R.G. 2010. Habitat use by western black widow spiders (Latrodectus hesperus) in coastal British Columbia: evidence of facultative group living. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 88: 334346.Google Scholar
Schuck-Paim, C. and Alonso, W.J. 2001. Deciding where to settle: conspecific attraction and web site selection in the orb-web spider Nephilengys cruentata . Animal Behaviour, 62: 10071012.Google Scholar
Shorthouse, D.P. 2010. SimpleMappr, an online tool to produce publication-quality point maps. Available from www.simplemappr.net [accessed 21 May 2016].Google Scholar
Spence, J.R., Zimmermann, M., and Wojcicki, J.P. 1996. Effects of food limitation and sexual cannibalism on reproductive output of the nursery web spider Dolomedes triton (Araneae: Pisauridae). Oikos, 75: 373382.Google Scholar
Stoltz, J.A., McNeil, J.N., and Andrade, M.C.B. 2007. Males assess chemical signals to discriminate just-mated females from virgins in redback spiders. Animal Behaviour, 74: 16691674.Google Scholar
Toft, S. and Wise, H.D. 1999. Growth, development, and survival of a generalist predator fed single- and mixed-species diets of different quality. Oecologia, 119: 191197.Google Scholar
Uetz, G.W., Boyle, J., Hieber, C.S., and Wilcox, R.S. 2002a. Antipredator benefits of group living in colonial web-building spiders: the ‘early warning’ effect. Animal Behaviour, 63: 445452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uetz, G.W., Papke, R., and Kilinc, B. 2002b. Influence of feeding regime on body size, body condition and a male secondary sexual character in Schizocosa ocreata wolf spiders (Araneae, Lycosidae): condition-dependence in a visual signaling trait. Journal of Arachnology, 30: 461469.Google Scholar
Vetter, R.S. and Antonelli, A.L. 2002. How to identify (or misidentify) the hobo spider [online]. Washington State University Cooperative Extension Pest Leaflet Series 116. Available from http://pep.wsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2015/05/PLS116_1.pdf [accessed 23 December 2016].Google Scholar
Vetter, R.S., Roe, A.H., Bennett, R.G., Baird, C.R., Royce, L.A., Lanier, W.T., et al. 2003. Distribution of the medically-implicated hobo spider (Araneae: Agelenidae) and a benign congener, Tegenaria duellica, in the United States and Canada. Journal of Medical Entomology, 40: 159164.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, M.E.A. and Lubin, Y. 2005. The functions of societies and the evolution of group living: spider societies as a test case. Biological Reviews, 80: 347361.Google Scholar