Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T09:16:25.833Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

IMMATURE STAGES OF CANADIAN NEOCHLAMISUS KARREN (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Laurent LeSage
Laurent LeSage
Affiliation:
Biosystematics Research Institute, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa K1A 0C6
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Eggs, larvae, and pupae of eight species of Neochlamisus Karren larvae, including all Canadian species of the genus, are described, illustrated, and keys are provided for their separation. On the basis of differences in eggs, larval cases, coloration in adult stages, and in host plant, N. alni (Brown) is removed from synonymy and is considered a valid species distinct from N. bebbianae (Brown). Rearing techniques used in the present study are also described in detail.

Résumé

L'auteur décrit et illustre l'oeuf, la larve et la nymphe de huit espèces de Neochlamisus Karren, incluant toutes les espèces canadiennes et fournit des clés pour leur identification. D'après les différences observées chez les oeufs, les fourreaux larvaires, la coloration des adultes, et les plantes nourricières, N. alni (Brown) est retiré de la synonymie et considéré comme une espèce valide, distincte de N. bebbianae (Brown). Les techniques d'élevage utilisées au cours de la présente étude sont aussi décrites en détail.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 116 , Issue 3 , March 1984 , pp. 383 - 409
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, W. H. 1947. A terminology for the anatomical characters useful in the taxonomy of weevil larvae. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 49: 123–132.Google Scholar
Böving, A. G. and Craighead, F. C.. 1931. An illustrated synopsis of the principal larval forms of the order Coleoptera. Entomologica am. 11: 1–351.Google Scholar
Briggs, E. M. 1905. The life history of case bearers: 1. Chlamys plicata. Cold Spring Harb. Monogr. 4. 12 pp.Google Scholar
Brown, W. J. 1943. The Canadian species of Exema and Arthrochlamys (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). Can. Ent. 75: 119–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, W. J. 1946. Some new Chrysomelidae, with notes on other species (Coleoptera). Can. Ent. 78: 47–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, W. J. 1952. Some species of Phytophaga (Coleoptera). Can. Ent. 84: 335–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burmeister, H. 1835. Die Verwandlungsgeschichte von Chlamys monstrosa. Arch. Naturgesch. 2: 245–254.Google Scholar
Ellis, C. R. and LeRoux, E. J.. 1964. Chlamisus cribripennis (Lec.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), a new pest of blueberries in Nova Scotia. Can. Ent. 96: 809–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girault, A. A. 1911. A note on Chlamys plicata Fabricius. Ent. News 22: 114.Google Scholar
Karren, J. B. 1972. A revision of the subfamily Chlamisinae of America North of Mexico (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Univ. Kans. Sci. Bull. 49: 875–988.Google Scholar
LeSage, L. 1982. The immature stages of Exema canadensis Pierce (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). Coleopt's Bull. 36: 318–327.Google Scholar
Lugger, O. 1899. Beetles injurious to fruit-producing plants. Bull. Minnesota agric. exp. Stn 66: 84–331.Google Scholar
Marlatt, C. L. 1888 a. Notes on the sycamore leaf-beetle (Chlamys plicata). Kansas Industrialist, March 3.Google Scholar
Marlatt, C. L. 1888 b. The sycamore leaf-beetle. Kansas Industrialist, March 3.Google Scholar
Medvedev, L. N. and Zaitzev, Yu. M.. 1978. The larvae of chrysomelid beetles of Siberia and the Far East. Academy of Sciences U.S.S.R., “Nauka” Publ. House, Moscow. 182 pp. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Medvedev, L. N. and Zaitzev, Yu. M.. 1979. Larvae of Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae of Vietnam. Zool. Zh. 58: 1159–1160. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Monros, F. 1952. Revision de las especies argentinas de Chlamisinae (Col., Chrysomelidae). Acta zool. lilloana 10: 489–672.Google Scholar
Morgan, G. T. and Maxwell, C. W.. 1952. Chlamisus sp. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), a new pest of strawberries. Can. Ent. 84: 123–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Packard, A. S. 1869. Guide to the study of insects. Holt, New York. pp. 509–510.Google Scholar
Packard, A. S. 1890. Fifth Rep. U.S. Ent. Commission, Washington, pp. 205, 511, 599, 646.Google Scholar
Peterson, A. 1960. Larvae of insects. Part II. Coleoptera, Diptera, Neuroptera, Siphonaptera, Mecoptera, Trichoptera. Columbus, Ohio. 416 pp.Google Scholar
Phipps, C. A. 1930. Blueberry and huckleberry insects. Bull. Maine agric. exp. Stn 356: 107–232.Google Scholar
Popenoe, E. A. and Marlatt, C. L.. 1888. Observations upon injurious insects. Rep. Hort. Dep. Kans. exp. Stn (1888): 30–61.Google Scholar
Riley, C. V. 1874. Innoxious insects: The Dominican Case—bearer — Coscinoptera dominica (Fabr.) Sixth Annual report on the noxious, beneficial, and other insects of the State of Missouri. Jefferson City. pp. 128–131.Google Scholar
Scudder, S. H. 1891. The early stages of three Coleoptera. Psyche, Camb. 6: 173–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Emden, F. 1932. Die Larven von Discoloma cassideum Reitt. (Col. Colyd.) und Skwarraia paradoxa Lac. (Col. Chrysom.). Zool. Ang. 101: 1–17.Google Scholar
Wallace, J. B. 1970. The defensive function of a case on a chrysomelid larva. J. Georgia ent. Soc. 5: 19–24.Google Scholar
Wickham, H. F. 1896. XVI. The Chrysomelidae of Ontario and Québec. Can. Ent. 28: 151–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, G. W. 1966. Life history and control of a casebearer, Chlamisus cribripennis (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), on blueberry. J. econ. Ent. 59: 823–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, G. W. 1970. Survival of blueberry casebeetle adults in burned blueberry fields. J. econ. Ent. 63: 1364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar