Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T06:06:08.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

HABITAT ASSOCIATIONS AND SEASONAL ACTIVITY OF GROUND-BEETLES (COLEOPTERA, CARABIDAE) IN CENTRAL ALBERTA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Jari Niemelä ,
John R. Spence  and
Deborah H. Spence
Jari Niemelä
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2E3
John R. Spence
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2E3
Deborah H. Spence
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2E3
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Carabid beetles were collected with grids of pitfall traps during two seasons in five habitats in the ecotone between aspen parkland and boreal mixedwood forest in central Alberta. The 23 abundant species (54 species in total) were divided into the following four distributional types: (1) Pterostichus adstrictus Eschz. was numerous in all five habitats (habitat generalist); (2) Platynus decentis Say, Calathus ingratus Dej., and Scaphinotus marginatus Fisch. were abundant in all four forest habitats (forest generalists); (3) another 10 species were common in one or two forest habitats (forest specialists); (4) nine species, representing mainly Agonum, Amara, and Bembidion, were restricted to a recently cleared timothy–clover grassland (meadow species). Soil moisture seemed to be important in determining habitat associations of the species among the forest types. Captures of most species were aggregated also within habitats, and the consistency of aggregation among particular traps suggests that it is mainly a response to subtle microhabitat differences. All abundant species, except S. marginatus, showed a peak of capture in May–June. Number of species, corrected for sample size by rarefaction, was highest in the meadow (27.5) and lowest in the dry upland aspen forest (11.9). Species diversity was highest in meadow and the lakeside forest habitats, but carabid assemblages of the four forest habitats were more similar to each other than to the meadow assemblage.

Résumé

Des carabes ont été capturés au moyen de pièges à fosses installés sur des grilles échantillons durant deux saisons, en cinq habitats de l’écotone situé entre un boisé de trembles et une forêt boréale mixte dans le centre de l’Alberta. Les 23 espèces abondantes (54 espèces en tout) étaient réparties selon les quatre catégories suivantes : (1) Pterostichus adstrictus Eschz. abondait dans les cinq habitats (généraliste quant au choix d’habitat), (2) Platynus decentis Say, Calathus ingratus Dej. et Schaphinotus marginatus Fisch. abondaient dans tous les habitats de la forêt (généralistes forestiers), (3) 10 autres espèces étaient communes dans l’un ou deux des habitats forestiers (spécialistes forestiers) et (4) neuf espèces, surtout des représentants d’Agonum, Amara et Bembidion, étaient restreintes à une prairie de phléoles–trèfles (espèces de prairie). L’humidité du sol semblait un important facteur de préférence d’habitat chez les espèces des types forestiers. La plupart des espèces étaient regroupées dans les habitats, et la fréquence plus grande des captures dans certains pièges semble indiquer les effets de différences subtiles entre les microhabitats. Toutes les espèces abondantes, à l’exception de S. marginatus, ont été capturées surtout en mai–juin. Le nombre d’espèces, après correction pour tenir compte des modifications de la taille des échantillons à cause de la raréfaction, était maximal dans la prairie (27,5) et minimal dans la forêt sèche et haute de trembles (11,9). La diversité des espèces était maximale dans la prairie et les habitats forestiers situés en bordure de lac, mais les associations de carabes des quatre habitats forestiers étaient plus semblables les unes aux autres qu’à l’association rencontrée en prairie.

[Traduit par la rédaction]

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 124 , Issue 3 , June 1992 , pp. 521 - 540
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Addicott, J.F., Aho, J.M., Antolin, M.F., Padilla, D.K., Richardson, J.S., and Soluk, D.A.. 1987. Ecological neighborhoods: Scaling environmental patterns. Oikos 49: 340–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, J. 1984. A re-analysis of the relationships between life cycle patterns and the geographical distribution of Fennoscandian carabid beetles. Journal of Biogeography 11: 479–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barlow, C.A. 1970. Phenology and distribution of some Pterostichus (Coleoptera: Carabidae) of eastern Canada. Journal. New York Entomological Society 78: 215–236.Google Scholar
Bennett, W.A. 1990. Scale of investigation and the detection of competition: An example from the House Sparrow and House Finch introductions in North America. American Naturalist 135: 725–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bousquet, Y. 1986. Number of clip setae on protibia as a diagnostic character between Pterostichus pensylvanicus LeConte and P. adstrictus Eschscholtz (Coleoptera: Carabidae). The Coleopterists Bulletin 40: 353–354.Google Scholar
Bousquet, Y., and Pilon, J.-G.. 1977. Activité saisonnière de quelques Coléoptèes Carabidae du Québec. Annales. Société Entomologique du Québec 22: 40–58.Google Scholar
Buse, A. 1988. Habitat selection and grouping of beetles (Coleoptera). Holarctic Ecology 11: 241–247.Google Scholar
Carter, A. 1976. Wing polymorphism in the insect species Agonum retractum Leconte (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 54: 1375–1382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, A. 1980. Agonum retractum (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in an aspen woodland in the Canadian Rockies: Population biology and chemical cycling. Pedobiologia 20: 101–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, A. 1981. Aspects of the comparative ecology of four Patrobus species (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Patrobini) at George Lake, Alberta. Quaestiones Entomologicae 17: 235–248.Google Scholar
Corns, I.G.W., and Annas, R.M.. 1986. Field guide to forest ecosystems of west-central Alberta. Canadian Forestry Service, Northern Forestry Centre, Edmonton, Alberta. 250 pp.Google Scholar
Danks, H.V., and Foottit, R.G.. 1989. Insects of the boreal zone of Canada. Canadian Entomologist 121: 626–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
den Boer, P.J. 1965. Verbreitung von Carabiden und ihr Zusammenhang mit Vegetation und Boden. pp. 172–183in Tüxen, R. (Ed.), Biosoziologie. Dr. W. Junk, Den Haag.Google Scholar
Doane, J. 1981. Seasonal captures and diversity of ground beetles (Carabidae: Coleoptera) in a wheat field and its grassy borders in central Saskatchewan. Quaestiones Entomologicae 17: 211–234.Google Scholar
Epstein, M.E., and Kulman, H.M.. 1990. Habitat distribution and seasonal occurrence of carabid beetles in east-central Minnesota. American Midland Naturalist 123: 209–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikstad, K.E., Byrkjedal, I., and Kålås, J.A.. 1989. Resource partitioning among seven carabid species on Hardangervidda, southern Norway. Annales Zoologici Fennici 26: 113–120.Google Scholar
Erwin, T.L. 1979. Thoughts on the evolutionary history of ground beetles: Hypotheses generated from comparative faunal analyses of lowland forest sites in temperate and tropical regions. pp. 539–587 in Erwin, T.L., Ball, G.E., Whitehead, D.R., and Halpern, A.L. (Eds.), Carabid Beetles, their Evolution, Natural History, and Classification. Dr. W. Junk, Den Haag. 635 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, J.H. 1971. Carabidae (Coleoptera) of an arable field in central Alberta. Quaestiones Entomologicae 7: 237–252.Google Scholar
Freitag, R., Hastings, L., Mercer, W.R., and Smith, A.. 1973. Ground beetle populations near a kraft mill. Canadian Entomologist 105: 299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goulet, H. 1974. Biology and relationships of Pterostichus adstrictus Eschscholtz and Pterostichus pensylvanicus Leconte (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Quaestiones Entomologicae 10: 3–33.Google Scholar
Goulet, H. 1983. The genera of Holarctic Elaphrini and species of Elaphrus Fabricius (Coleoptera: Carabidae): Classification, phylogeny and zoogeography. Quaestiones Entomologicae 19: 219–482.Google Scholar
Greenslade, P.J.M. 1963. A concentration of Carabidae (Coleoptera) at Fleet in Dorset. Entomologist's Monthly Magazine 99: 46–48.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, R. 1980. Qualitative and quantitative aspects of the food of ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae): A review. Netherlands Journal of Zoology 30: 555–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, R. 1981. Methodology of explaining differences in dietary composition of carabid beetles by competition. Oikos 45: 37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, R. 1987. Scales of variation: Their distinction and ecological importance. Annales Zoologici Fennici 24: 195–202.Google Scholar
Holliday, N.J. 1991. Species responses of carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) during post-fire regeneration of boreal forest. Canadian Entomologist 123: 1369–1389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurlbert, S.H. 1990. Spatial distribution of montane unicorn. Oikos 58: 257–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirk, V.M. 1971 a. Ground beetles in cropland in South Dakota. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 64: 238–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirk, V.M. 1971 b. Biological studies of a ground beetle Pterostichus lucublandus. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 64: 540–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotliar, N.B., and Wiens, J.A.. 1990. Multiple scales of patchiness and patch structure: A hierarchical framework for the study of heterogeneity. Oikos 59: 253–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landry, J.-F. 1981. Resource partitioning in a guild of marsh dwelling Agonum (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Department of Entomology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. 209 pp.Google Scholar
Liebherr, J., and Mahar, J.. 1979. The carabid fauna of the upland oak forest in Michigan: Survey and analysis. Coleopterists Bulletin 33: 183–197.Google Scholar
Lindroth, C.H. 1949. Die Fennoskandischen Carabidae. III. Göteborgs Kungliga Vetenskaps och Vitterhets-samhälles Handlingar B4(3): 1–911.Google Scholar
Lindroth, C.H. 1961. The ground-beetles of Canada and Alaska. Opuscula Entomologica, Supplementum XX: 1–200.Google Scholar
Lindroth, C.H. 1963. The ground-beetles of Canada and Alaska. Opuscula Entomologica, Supplementum XXIV: 201–408.Google Scholar
Lindroth, C.H. 1966. The ground-beetles of Canada and Alaska. Opuscula Entomologica, Supplementum XXIX: 409–648.Google Scholar
Lindroth, C.H. 1968. The ground-beetles of Canada and Alaska. Opuscula Entomologica, Supplementum XXXIII: 649–944.Google Scholar
Lindroth, C.H. 1969. The ground-beetles of Canada and Alaska. Opuscula Entomologica, Supplementum XXXIV: 945–1192.Google Scholar
Loreau, M. 1985. Annual activity and life cycles of carabid beetles in two forest communities. Holarctic Ecology 8: 228–235.Google Scholar
Loreau, M. 1988. Determinants of the seasonal pattern in the niche structure of a forest carabid community. Pedobiologia 31: 75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludwig, J.A., and Reynolds, J.F.. 1988. Statistical Ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY. 337 pp.Google Scholar
Luff, M.L. 1986. Aggregation of some Carabidae in pitfall traps. pp. 385–397 in den Boer, P.J., Luff, M.L., Mossakowski, D., and Weber, F. (Eds.), Carabid Beetles, their Adaptations and Dynamics. Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart. 551 pp.Google Scholar
Macyk, T.M. 1972. Relief and microclimate as related to soil properties. Unpublished M.Sc. thesis, Department of Soil Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. 99 pp.Google Scholar
Macyk, T.M., Pawluk, S., and Lindsay, J.D.. 1978. Relief and microclimate as related to soil properties. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 58: 421–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, R.M., and Southwood, T.R.E.. 1990. Introduction. pp. 1–22 in Shorrocks, B., and Swingland, I.R. (Eds.), Living in a Patchy Environment. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 246 pp.Google Scholar
Morisita, M. 1959. Measuring of the dispersion of individuals and analysis of the distributional patterns. Memoirs. Faculty of Science. Kyushu University. Series F. Biology 2: 215–235.Google Scholar
Moss, E.H. 1955. The vegetation of Alberta. Botanical Review 21: 493–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, E.H., and Packer, J.G.. 1983. Flora of Alberta, 2nd ed. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Ont. 687 pp.Google Scholar
Niemelä, J. 1990. Spatial distribution of carabid beetles in the southern Finnish taiga: A question of scale. pp. 143–155 in Stork, N. (Ed.), Ground Beetles: Their Role in Ecological and Environmental Studies. Intercept Publications, Andover, UK. 424 pp.Google Scholar
Niemelä, J., Haila, Y., and Halme, E.. 1987. Carabid assemblages in southern Finland, a forest–field comparison. Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica 22: 417–424.Google Scholar
Niemelä, J., Haila, Y., Halme, E., Lahti, T., Pajunen, T., and Punttila, P.. 1988. The distribution of carabid beetles in fragments of old coniferous taiga and adjacent managed forest. Annales Zoologici Fennici 25: 107–119.Google Scholar
Niemelä, J., Haila, Y., Halme, E., Pajunen, T., and Punttila, P.. 1989. The annual activity cycle of carabid beetles in the southern Finnish taiga. Annales Zoologici Fennici 26: 35–41.Google Scholar
Niemelä, J., Haila, Y., Halme, E., Pajunen, T., and Punttila, P.. 1992. Small-scale heterogeneity in the spatial distribution of carabid beetles in the southern Finnish taiga. Journal of Biogeography. In press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niemelä, J., Haila, Y., and Ranta, E.. 1986. Spatial heterogeneity of carabid beetle dispersion in uniform forests on the Åland Islands, SW Finland. Annales Zoologici Fennici 23: 289–296.Google Scholar
Niemelä, J., and Halme, E.. 1992. Habitat associations of carabid beetles in fields and forests on the Åland Islands, SW Finland. Ecography 15: 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niemelä, J., Halme, E., and Haila, Y.. 1990. Balancing sampling effort in pitfall trapping of carabid beetles. Entomologica Fennica 1: 233–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niemelä, J., Halme, E., Pajunen, T., and Haila, Y.. 1986. Sampling spiders and carabid beetles with pitfall traps: The effect of increased sampling effort. Annales Entomologici Fennici 52: 109–111.Google Scholar
Quinn, M.A., Kepner, R.L., Walgenbach, D.D., Bohls, R.A., Pooler, P.D., Foster, R.N., Reuter, K.C., and Swain, J.L.. 1991. Habitat characteristics and grasshopper community dynamics on mixed-grass rangeland. Canadian Entomologist 123: 89–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivard, I. 1964. Observations of the breeding periods of some ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in eastern Ontario. Canadian Journal of Zoology 42: 1081–1084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, J.S. 1972. Forest regions of Canada. Canadian Forest Service Publications, 1300. 172 pp.Google Scholar
Samoil, J. (Ed.). 1988. Management and utilization of northern mixedwoods. Inf. Rep. NOR-X-296, Northern Forestry Centre, Edmonton, Alta. 163 pp.Google Scholar
Schjøtz-Cristensen, B. 1968. Some notes on the biology and ecology of Carabus hortensis L. (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Natura Jutlandica 14: 127–154.Google Scholar
Simberloff, D.S. 1978. Use of rarefaction and related methods in ecology. pp. 150–165in Dickson, G.L., Garins, J. JrLivingston, J. (Eds.), Biological Data in Water Pollution Assessment: Quantitative and Statistical Analysis. American Society for Testing and Materials STP 652.Google Scholar
Southwood, T.R.E. 1977. Habitat, the templet for ecological strategies? Journal of Animal Ecology 46: 337–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southwood, T.R.E. 1988. Tactics, strategies and templets. Oikos 52: 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spence, J.R. 1989. The habitat templet and life history strategies of pond skaters (Heteroptera: Gerridae): Reproductive potential, phenology and wing dimorphism. Canadian Journal of Zoology 67: 2432–2447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spence, J.R. 1990. Success of European carabid species in western Canada: Preadaptation for synanthropy? pp. 129–141 in Stork, N. (Ed.), Ground Beetles: Their Role in Ecological and Environmental studies. Intercept Publications, Andover, UK. 424 pp.Google Scholar
Spence, J.R., and Berg, N.. 1984. Our beef and grassland beetles. Newsletter—Arthropods of Canadian Grasslands (Biological Survey of Canada) 2: 5–6.Google Scholar
Szyszko, J. 1986. Dynamics of population size and development of the carabid fauna in pine stands of poor sandy soils (Facts and suppositions). pp. 331–334 in den Boer, P.J., Luff, M.L., Mossakowski, D., and Weber, F. (Eds.), Carabid Beetles, their Adaptations and Dynamics. Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart. 551 pp.Google Scholar
Thiele, H.-U. 1967. Ein Beitrag zur Experimentellen Analyse von Euryökie und stenökie bei Carabiden. Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Ökologie der Tiere 58: 355–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiele, H.-U. 1977. Carabid Beetles in their Environments. Springer Verlag, Berlin. 369 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Drift, J. 1959. Field studies on the surface fauna of forests. Bijdragen tot de Dierkunde 29: 79–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiens, J.A. 1976. Population responses to patchy environments. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 7: 81–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiens, J.A. 1989. Spatial scaling in ecology. Functional Ecology 3: 385–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zar, J.H. 1984. Biostatistical Analysis, 2nd ed. Prentice Hall International, London. 718 pp.Google Scholar