Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T07:46:00.985Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EFFECTS OF SEVERAL INSECT GROWTH REGULATORS ON EGG HATCH AND SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPMENT IN THE CABBAGE MAGGOT DELIA RADICUM (L.) (DIPTERA: ANTHOMYIIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Terry-Lynn Young ,
Roger Gordon  and
Marcel Cornect
Terry-Lynn Young
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada AIB 3X9
Roger Gordon*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada AIB 3X9
Marcel Cornect
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada AIB 3X9
*
1Author to whom reprint requests should be addressed.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Eggs (24–28 h old) of Delia radicum (L.) were treated with the same doses of diflubenzuron, methoprene, juvenile hormone I, or precocene II. Diflubenzuron significantly reduced egg hatching compared with untreated and solvent-treated controls. Methoprene had a delayed effect, preventing eclosion of adults from pupae that subsequently developed from treated eggs. A commercial formulation of diflubenzuron, Dimilin®, significantly suppressed and delayed hatching of eggs treated when 3–7 h old but not of eggs treated when 24–48 h old. Diflubenzuron may be as effective as the commercial insecticide carbofuran in protecting rutabaga slices from damage, as all larvae that did hatch died shortly afterwards.

Résumé

Des oeufs (24–48 h) de Delia radicum (L.) ont été traités avec des doses similaires de diflubenzuron, méthoprène, hormone juvénile I et précocène II. Le diflubenzuron a réduit significativement l’éclosion des oeufs par rapport à des témoins non-traités ou traités au solvant. Le méthoprène avait un effet retardé, empêchant l’émergence d’adultes issus de pupes provenant d’oeufs traités. Une préparation commerciale du diflubenzuron, le Dimilin®, a significativement réduit et retardé l’éclosion d’oeufs traités 3–7 h après l’éclosion, mais pas celle d’oeufs traités 24–48 h après. Le diflubenzuron peut être aussi efficace que le carbofuran du type commercial pour la prévention de dommages sur tranches de rutabaga, puisque toutes les larves qui ont éclos sont mortes peu après.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 119 , Issue 5 , May 1987 , pp. 481 - 488
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beeman, W.R. 1982. Recent advances in mode of action of insecticides. A. Rev. Ent. 27: 253–281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowers, W.S., Ohta, T., Cleere, J.S., and Marsella, P.A.. 1976. Discovery of insect anti-juvenile hormones in plants. Science, N.Y. 193: 542–547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, A.C., and Mayer, R.T.. 1985. Insecticides: effects on the cuticle. pp. 57–77in Kerkut, G.A., and Gilbert, L.I. (Eds.), Comprehensive Insect Physiology Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Vol. 12. Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Goble, H.W., McEwen, F.L., Braun, H.E., and Frank, R.. 1972. Cabbage maggot control in root and stem crucifers with new insecticides. J. econ. Ent. 65: 837–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, C.R. 1977. Insecticide resistance in soil insects attacking crops. pp. 321–351in Watson, D.L., and Brown, A.W.A. (Eds.), Pesticide Management and Insecticide Resistance. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Howard, R.J. 1977. Screening insecticides in the field for efficacy against the cabbage maggot. pp. 159–160in Pestic. Res. Rep. Agric. Can. Compiled by: Canada Committee on Pesticide Use in Agriculture, Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
Judge, F.D., Rinick, H.B., and McEwen, F.L.. 1968. Field testing candidate insecticides on radish, cabbage, and cauliflower for control of the cabbage maggot in New York State. J. econ. Ent. 61: 1572–1577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacey, L.A., and Mulla, M.S.. 1977. Larvicidal and ovicidal activity of Dimilin® against Simulium vittatum. J. econ. Ent. 70: 369–373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonald, S., and Swailes, G.E.. 1975. Dieldrin resistance in Hylemya brassicae (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) in Alberta. Can. Ent. 107: 729–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miura, T., Schaefer, C.H., Takahashi, R.M., and Mulligan, F.S. III., 1976. Effects of the insect growth inhibitor, Dimilin®, on hatching of mosquito eggs. J. econ. Ent. 69: 655–658.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miura, T., and Takahashi, R.M.. 1979. Effects of the insect growth inhibitor SIR 8514 on hatching of southern house mosquito eggs. J. econ. Ent. 72: 692–694.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Philip, H.G., Steiner, M.Y., and Howard, R.J.. 1977. Evaluation of some soil insecticides for control of root maggots in rutabagas. pp. 165–166in Pestic. Res. Rep. Agric. Can. Compiled by: Canada Committee on Pesticide Use in Agriculture, Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
Read, D.C. 1965. Rearing root maggots, chiefly Hylemya brassicae (Bouché) (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) for bioassay. Can. Ent. 97: 136–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Read, D.C. 1970. Controlling the cabbage maggot, Hylemya brassicae (Diptera: Anthomyiidae), with chemical pesticides. Can. Ent. 102: 667–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Retnakaran, A., Granett, J., and Ennis, T.. 1985. Insect growth regulators. pp. 530–601in Kerkut, G.A., and Gilbert, L.I. (Eds.), Comprehensive Insect Physiology Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Vol. 12. Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Riddiford, L.M. 1970. Prevention of metamorphosis by exposure of insect eggs to juvenile hormone analogs. Science, N.Y. 167: 287–288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ritcey, G., McGraw, R., and McEwen, F.L.. 1977. Pesticides for cabbage maggot control on rutabaga. pp. 169–170in Pestic. Res. Rep. Agric. Can. Compiled by: Canada Committee on Pesticide Use in Agriculture, Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
Sokal, R.R., and Rohlf, F.J.. 1969. Biometry. The principles and practice of statistics in biological research. W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco. 776 pp.Google Scholar
Spielman, A., and Williams, C.M.. 1966. Lethal effects of a synthetic juvenile hormone on larvae of the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti. Science, N.Y. 154: 1043–1044.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Srivastava, U.S., and Gilbert, L.I.. 1968. Juvenile hormone: effects on a higher dipteran. Science, N.Y. 161: 61–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turnbull, S.A. 1982. The effects of several insect growth regulators on the development of the onion maggot, Hylemya antiqua (Meigen) and the cabbage maggot, Hylemya brassicae (Wiedmann). M.Sc. thesis, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario. 115 pp.Google Scholar
Van de Veire, M., and Delcour, E.. 1976. Effect of diflubenzuron on the offspring after treatment of the adult cabbage root fly Hylemya brassicae. Med. Fac. Landb. Rijksuniv. Gent. 41: 965–974.Google Scholar
Van de Veire, M., and DeLoof, A.. 1973. Effects of synthetic cecropia juvenile hormone and of a mimic substance, applied to different stages of the cabbage maggot, Hylemya brassicae. Ent. exp. appl. 16: 491–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van de Veire, M., and DeLoof, A.. 1974. Potential control of the cabbage maggot, Hylemya brassicae (Bouché) by the insect growth regulator,1-(4′-ethylphenoxy)- 6,7-epoxy- 3,7-dimethyl- 2-octene. Med. Fac. Landb. Rijksuniv. Gent. 39: 286–290.Google Scholar
Willis, J.H., and Lawrence, P.A.. 1970. Deferred action of juvenile hormone. Nature, Lond. 225: 81–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, J.E. 1970. Hormones for control of livestock arthropods. Development of an assay to select candidate compounds with juvenile hormone activity in the stable fly. J. econ. Ent. 63: 878–883.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed