Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T23:35:56.227Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cost and benefit of ant attendance for Aphis craccivora (Hemiptera: Aphididae) with reference to aphid colony size

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Noboru Katayama
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Kobe University, Nada, Kobe, Japan 657-8501
Nobuhiko Suzuki*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Kobe University, Nada, Kobe, Japan 657-8501
*
2Corresponding author (e-mail: suzukin@cc.saga-u.ac.jp).

Abstract

Honeydew utilization by the ant Lasius niger L. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), honeydew excretion cost for the aphid Aphis craccivora Koch, and ant protection service for aphids against the lady beetle Coccinella septempunctata L. (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) were examined in a laboratory. The duration of honeydew utilization by ants increased with increase in aphid density. The presence of ants shortened the residence time of the lady beetle larva on a plant and reduced the proportion of aphids eaten. At a density of 5 aphids per plant, one aphid with ants excreted honeydew at a frequency two times higher than that of an aphid without ants, but not at a density of 100 aphids per plant. Therefore, a larger aphid colony may increase the benefit and decrease the cost of ant attendance.

Résumé

Nous avons étudié, en laboratoire, l’utilisation du miellat par les fourmis Lasius niger L. (Hymenoptera : Formicidae), les coûts reliés à l’excrétion du miellat pour les pucerons Aphis craccivora Koch et le service de protection des pucerons assuré par les fourmis contre la coccinelle Coccinella septempunctata L. (Coleoptera : Coccinellidae). La durée d’utilisation du miellat augmente en fonction de la densité des pucerons. La présence des fourmis diminue la durée de séjour des larves de coccinelles sur un plant et réduit le nombre de pucerons consommés. À une densité de 5 pucerons par plant, en présence de fourmis, un puceron peut excréter son miellat deux fois plus rapidement qu’en l’absence de fourmis, mais pas à une densité de 100 pucerons par plant. Une colonie importante de pucerons peut donc augmenter les bénéfices reliés à la présence des fourmis et en diminuer les coûts.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bonser, R., Wright, P.J., Bament, S., Chukwu, U.O. 1998. Optimal patch use by foraging workers of Lasius fuliginosus, L. niger and Myrmica ruginodis. Ecological Entomology 23: 1521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breton, L.M., Addicott, J.F. 1992. Density-dependent mutualism in an aphid-ant interaction. Ecology 73: 2175–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bristow, C.M. 1984. Differential benefits from ant attendance to two species of Homoptera on New York ironweed (Vernia noveboracensis). Journal of Animal Ecology 53: 715–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bristow, C.M. 1991. Why are so few aphids ant tended? pp 104–19 in Huxley, C.R., Cutler, D.F. (Eds), Ant–plant interaction. New York: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, R. 1987. Interactions involving plant, Homoptera, and ants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4: 231–57Google Scholar
Buckley, R. 1991. More aggressive ant species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) provide better protection for soft scales and mealybugs (Homoptera: Coccidae, Pseudococcidae). Biotropica 23: 282–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushman, J.H., Whitham, T.G. 1991. Competition mediating the outcome of a mutualism: protective services of ants as a limiting resource for membracids. The American Naturalist 138: 851–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendrix, D.L., Wei, Y., Leggett, J.E. 1992. Homopteran honeydew sugar composition is determined by both the insect and plant species. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 101: 23–7Google Scholar
Itioka, T., Inoue, T. 1999. The alternation of mutualistic ant species affects the population growth of their trophobiont mealybug. Ecography 22: 169–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakata, H. 1995. Density-dependent predation of the ant Lasius niger (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on two attended aphids Lachnus tropicalis and Myzocallis kuricola (Homoptera: Aphididae). Researches on Population Ecology 37: 159–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakata, H. 1999. Indirect interactions between two aphid species in relation to ant attendance. Ecological Research 14: 329–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakata, H., Hashimoto, Y. 2000. Should aphids attract or repel ants? Effect of rival aphids and extrafloral nectaries on ant-aphid interactions. Researches on Population Ecology 42: 171–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stadler, B., Dixon, A.F.G. 1998. Costs of ant attendance for aphids. Journal of Animal Ecology 67: 454–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stadler, B., Dixon, A.F.G. 1999. Ant attendance in aphids: why different degrees of myrmecophily? Ecological Entomology 24: 363–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turchin, P., Kareiva, P. 1989. Aggregation in Aphis varians: an effective strategy for reducing predation risk. Ecology 70: 1008–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Völkl, W., Woodring, J., Fischer, M., Lorenz, M.W., Hoffmann, K.H. 1999. Ant-aphid mutualisms: the impact of honeydew production and honeydew sugar composition on ant preferences. Oecologia 118: 483–91Google ScholarPubMed
Way, M.J. 1963. Mutualism between ants and honeydew-procuring Homoptera. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 8: 307–44Google Scholar
Yao, I., Akimoto, S. 2001. Ant attendance changes the sugar composition of the honeydew of the drepanosiphid aphid Tuberculatus quercicola. Oecologia 128: 3643CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yao, I., Shibao, H., Akimoto, S. 2000. Costs and benefits of ant attendance to the drepanosiphid aphid Tuberculatus quercicola. Oikos 89: 310CrossRefGoogle Scholar