Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T11:35:36.197Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

AN APPROACH TO MEASURING CHANGES IN THE REPRODUCTION OF SPRUCE BUDWORM (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE) FIELD POPULATIONS FROM SURVEY DATA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

C. A. Miller
Affiliation:
Maritimes Forest Research Centre, Canadian Forestry Service, Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 5P7

Abstract

Survey counts of spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.), female pupae, and eggs recorded annually at about 1000 sample points in New Brunswick from 1960 to 1975 provided ratios of eggs to females (E/F ratios) which are a measure of apparent reproduction. The 10-fold variation in the ratios was inversely associated with the frequency of July storm tracks. A positive relationship between E/F ratios and changes in the area of the budworm infestation in the province was also shown.

Résumé

De 1960 à 1975, on compta les pupes femelles et les œufs de la Tordeuse, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.) à tous les ans dans environ 1000 places-échantillons au Nouveau-Brunswick. Par la suite, on établit les rapports œufs-femelles (rapports O/F). Après analyse de ces données, l’auteur trouva une variation, variant 10 fois, de la reproduction apparente des populations, ce qui peut partiellement être expliqué par les conditions de météo (la fréquence des orages en juillet). Il établit une relation entre les rapports O/F et les variations annuelles d’importances des infestations par la Tordeuse dans la province.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Greenbank, D. O. 1957. The role of climate and dispersal in the initiation of outbreaks of the spruce budworm in New Brunswick. 2. The role of dispersal. Can. J. Zool. 35: 385403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenbank, D. O. 1963. The analysis of moth survival and dispersal in the unsprayed area. pp. 87–98 in Morris, R. F. (Ed.), The dynamics of epidemic spruce budworm populations. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 31. 332 pp.Google Scholar
Greenbank, D. O. 1973. The dispersal process of spruce budworm moths. Info. Rep. M-X-39. Maritimes Forest Research Centre, Fredericton, N.B.Google Scholar
Macdonald, D. R. 1963. The analysis of survival and reproduction in the sprayed area (area 2). pp. 130–173 in Morris, R. F. (Ed.). The dynamics of epidemic spruce budworm populations. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 31. 332 pp.Google Scholar
Miller, C. A. 1963. The analysis of fecundity proportion in the unsprayed area. pp. 75–86 in Morris, R. F. (Ed.), The dynamics of epidemic spruce budworm populations. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 31. 332 pp.Google Scholar
Miller, C. A. and Kettela, E. G.. 1976. Aerial control operations against the spruce budworm in New Brunswick. pp. 94112in Prebble, M. L. (Ed.), Aerial control of forest insects in Canada. Dept. of Environment, Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
Morris, R. F., Webb, F. E., and Bennett, C. W., 1956. A method of phenological survey for use in forest insect studies. Can. J. Zool. 34: 533540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaefer, G. W. 1976. Radar observations of insect flight. pp. 157197in Rainey, R. C. (Ed.), Insect flight. Symposia Roy. ent. Soc. Lond. 7. Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Wellington, W. G., Fettes, J. J., Turner, K. B., and Belyea, R. M.. 1950. Physical and biological indicators of the development of outbreaks of the spruce budworm. Can. J. Res. (D), 28: 308331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar