Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T10:14:21.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

AN ANALYSIS OF THE NATURAL BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF TRICHOPLUSIA NI (LEPIDOPTERA: NOCTUIDAE) ON COTTON IN CALIFORNIA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

L. E. Ehler  and
R. van den Bosch
L. E. Ehler
Affiliation:
Division of Biological Control, University of California, Berkeley
R. van den Bosch
Affiliation:
Division of Biological Control, University of California, Berkeley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The impact of natural enemies on Trichoplusia ni (Hübner) is reviewed. Disappearance of eggs and small larvae (presumably due to predation) is consistently the major intrageneration mortality. Parasitoids and a nuclear polyhedrosis virus effect mortality of larvae surviving early-instar predation. From the analysis, it is argued that natural enemies capable of effective colonization of the habitat and rapid exploitation of the prey population (i.e., r-strategists) are suitable agents for biological control of pests of annual or short-cycle crops. Polyembryony, polyphagy, and polyhedrosis represent attributes which enable the particular natural enemy to implement the rapid-host-exploitation strategy. This interpretation gives added theoretical support for importation of exotic natural enemies of pests of non-perennial crop plants.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 106 , Issue 10 , October 1974 , pp. 1067 - 1073
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

DeBach, P. (Editor and contributor.) 1964. Biological control of insect pests and weeds. Reinhold, New York, 844 pp.Google Scholar
DeBach, P. 1971. The use of imported natural enemies in insect pest management ecology. Proc. Tall Timb. Conf. Ecol. Anim. Contr. Hab. Mgt 3: 211–233.Google Scholar
Doutt, R. L. and DeBach, P.. 1964. Some biological control concepts and questions. Chap. 5. In DeBach, P. (Ed.), Biological control of insect pests and weeds. Reinhold, New York. 844 pp.Google Scholar
Ehler, L. E., Eveleens, K. G., and van den Bosch, R.. 1973. An evaluation of some natural enemies of cabbage looper on cotton in California. Environ. Ent. 2: 1009–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falcon, L. A., van den Bosch, R., Ferris, C. A., Stromberg, L. K., Etzel, L. K., Stinner, R. E., and Leigh, T. F.. 1968. A comparison of season-long cotton-pest-control programs in California during 1966. J. econ. Ent. 61: 633–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Force, D. C. 1972. r- and K-strategists in endemic host-parasitoid communities. Bull. ent. Soc. Am. 18: 135–137.Google Scholar
Hansberry, R. 1968. Prospects for non-chemical insect control—an industrial view. Bull. ent. Soc. Am. 14: 229–234.Google Scholar
Hassell, M. P. and May, R. M.. 1973. Stability in insect host-parasite models. J. Anim. Ecol. 42: 693–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huffaker, C. B., van de Vrie, M., and McMurtry, J. A.. 1969. The ecology of tetranychid mites and their natural control. A. Rev. Ent. 14: 125–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huffaker, C. B., Messenger, P. S., and DeBach, P.. 1971. The natural enemy component in natural control and the theory of biological control. Chap. 2. In Huffaker, C. B. (Ed.), Biological control. Plenum Press, New York and London. 511 pp.Google Scholar
Leigh, T. F. 1963. Considerations of distribution, abundance and control of acarine pests of cotton. Advances in Acarology 1: 14–20.Google Scholar
Lloyd, D. C. 1960. Significance of the type of host plant crop in successful biological control of insect pests. Nature 187: 430–431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacArthur, R. H. and Wilson, E. O.. 1967. The theory of island biogeography. Princeton Univ. Press. 203 pp.Google Scholar
Newsom, L. D. 1970. The end of an era and future prospects for insect control. Proc. Tall Timb. Conf. Ecol. Anim. Contr. Hab. Mgt 2: 117–136.Google Scholar
Ridgway, R. L. 1972. Use of parasites, predators and microbial agents in management of insect pests of crops. In Implementing practical pest management strategies. Proc. Nat. Ext. Ins. Pest Mgt Workshop, Purdue Univ. (Lafayette, Ind.). 206 pp.Google Scholar
Smith, G. L. California cotton insects. Bull. Calif. agric. Exp. Stn, No. 660. 50 pp.Google Scholar
Southwood, T. R. E. 1966. Ecological methods. Methuen, London. 391 pp.Google Scholar
Southwood, T. R. E. and Jepson, W. F.. 1962. Studies on the populations of Oscinella frit L. (Diptera: Chloropidae) in the oat crop. J. Anim. Ecol. 31: 481–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van den Bosch, R. and Hagen, K. S.. 1966. Predaceous and parasitic arthropods in California cotton fields. Bull. Calif. agric. Exp. Stn, No. 820. 32 pp.Google Scholar
van den Bosch, R., Leigh, T. F., Falcon, L. A., Stern, V. M., Gonzales, D., and Hagen, K. S.. 1971. The developing program of integrated control of cotton pests in California. Chap. 17. In Huffaker, C. B. (Ed.), Biological control. Plenum Press, New York and London. 511 pp.Google Scholar