Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T14:56:08.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Host Distribution on the Reproduction of Encarsia formosa Gahan (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

T. Burnett
Affiliation:
Entomology Laboratory, Belleville, Ontario

Extract

That insect parasites regulate and, in the case of newly introduced species, sometimes reduce the average density of insect pests has led to an exmination of the properties of parasites in general. Consideration has been given to the manner in which parasites select hosts for oviposition and to the physiological and psychological basis of this selection. The distribution of parasite progeny among suitable hosts has been analysed in many cases, for the fewer the hostS that are superparasitized for any given number of parasite eggs laid the greater the efficiency of the parasite in reducing host density. It is obvious that before the factors of host selection and superparasitism become important in host-parasite interaction the parasite must find the host individuals. When the hosts are confined to a relatively small area the potential oviposition of the parasite, subject to discrimination among hosts and restraint in oviposition, often determines the level of parasitism. As distance between individuals of the host population becomes greater, however, it is necessary for the parasite to search the environment more extensively. Therefore, the ability of the parasite to find hosts is a factor of prime importance in determining its influence on the density of its host. The success with which a parasite discovers hosts in relation to host density is determined, of course, by several characteristics of the parasite species and by the modification of these characteristics through variations in the physical environment.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Parsons, F. S. and Ullyett, G. C.. 1936. Investigations on Trichogramma lutea, Gir., as a parasite of the cotton bollworm, Heliothis obsoleta, Fabr. Bull. Ent. Res. 27: 219235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, H. S. 1939. Insect populations in relation to biological control. Ecol. Monogr. 9: 311320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoy, R. H. 1932. Appendix: Superparasitism by Collyria calcitrator, Grav. Bull. Ent. Res. 23: 215216.Google Scholar
Thompson, W. R. 1939. Biological control and the theories of the interactions of populations. Parasitology 31: 299388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullyett, G. C. 1945. Distribution of progeny by Microbracon hebetor Say. J. Ent. Soc. S. Africa 8: 123131.Google Scholar
Ullyett, G. C. 1949a. Distribution of progeny by Chelonus texanus Cress. (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Canadian Ent. 81: 2544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullyett, G. C. 1949b. Distribution of progeny by Cryptus inornatus Pratt (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Canadian Ent. 81: 285299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar