Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-21T02:26:55.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

EFFECT OF AGE OF THE PUPARIUM OF THE APPLE MAGGOT, RHAGOLETIS POMONELLA (WALSH) (DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE), ON PARASITISM BY PHYGADEUON WIESMANNI SACHTL. (HYMENOPTERA: ICHNEUMONIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Elmer A.C. Hagley
Affiliation:
Agriculture Canada Research Station, Vineland Station, Ontario, Canada L0R 2E0
A.R. Biggs
Affiliation:
Agriculture Canada Research Station, Vineland Station, Ontario, Canada L0R 2E0
G.E. Timbers
Affiliation:
Agriculture Canada Research Station, Vineland Station, Ontario, Canada L0R 2E0
J. Coutu-Sundy
Affiliation:
Agriculture Canada Research Station, Vineland Station, Ontario, Canada L0R 2E0

Abstract

The thickness of the wall of the puparium of the apple maggot, Rhagoletis pomonella (Walsh), increased as the puparium aged. The force required to pierce the wall of the puparium also increased with age, and this relationship was best described by a cubic polynomial. Increasing thickness and hardness of the wall of the puparium will likely influence the efficacy of the parasite Phygadeuon wiesmanni Sachtl.

Résumé

L’épaisseur de la paroi du puparium augmente en fonction de l’âge chez la Mouche de la pomme, Rhagoletis pomonella (Walsh). La force requise pour percer la paroi du puparium augmente aussi en fonction de l’âge et c’est une équation polynomiale du troisième degré qui décrit le mieux cette relation. L’épaisseur et la dureté de plus en plus grandes du puparium affectent probablement l’efficacité du parasite Phygadeuon wiesmanni Sachtl.

[Traduit par la rédaction]

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Buckley, D.J., Timbers, G.E., Kloek, M., and Lalonde, M.J.L.. 1984. Data acquisition and texture profile analysis using a personal computer system. Journal of Texture Studies 15: 247261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, J.A. 1940. Apple maggot. Report of Insect and other investigations in the Simcoe Laboratory, Norfolk County, in 1940. Cited in Annual Report of the Entomology Laboratory, Vineland Station 1: 2728.Google Scholar
Hoffmeister, T. 1988. The biology of the cherry fruit fly, Rhagoletis cerasi and some related species, and of their parasitoids. English summary, Diploma Zoological Institute, University of Kiel, 1988. 29 pp.Google Scholar
Jensen, W.A. 1962. Botanical Histochemistry. W.H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco, CA. 405 pp.Google Scholar
Johansen, D.A. 1940. Plant Microtechnique. McGraw Hill, New York, NY. 523 pp.Google Scholar
Monteith, L.G. 1971. The status of parasites of the apple maggot, Rhagoletis pomonella (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Ontario. The Canadian Entomologist 103: 507512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monteith, L.G. 1978. Additional records and the role of parasites of the apple maggot, Rhagoletis pomonella (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Ontario. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Ontario 108: 36.Google Scholar
SAS Institute. 1985. SAS Users Guide: Statistics, 5th ed. SAS Institute, Cary, NC. 956 pp.Google Scholar
SAS Institute. 1986. SAS System for Regression. SAS Institute, Cary, NC. pp. 103106.Google Scholar
Smith, A.M. 1988. Apple maggot. Pest Management Program for Apple Series. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food. Agdex 211/634: 2 pp.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, R.E. 1924. Anatomy and metamorphosis of the apple maggot, Rhagoletis pomonella Walsh. Journal of Agricultural Research 28: 136.Google Scholar
Voisey, P.W. 1971. Modernization of texture instrumentation. Journal of Texture Studies 2: 129195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zdarek, J., and Fraenkel, G.. 1972. The mechanism of puparium formation in flies. Journal of Experimental Zoology 179: 315324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar